Preview

Dhl Logistics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1128 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Dhl Logistics
DHL Logbook - in cooperation with Technical University Darmstadt

Historical development of logistics The great logistics success story
Logistics has been playing a fundamental role in global development for almost 5,000 years now. Since the construction of the pyramids in ancient Egypt, logistics has made remarkable strides. Time and again, brilliant logistics solutions have formed the basis for the transition to a new historical and economic era. Examples of this fundamental progress include the invention of the sea-cargo container and the creation of novel service systems during the 20th century. Both are integral parts of globalization today.

Around 2700 B.C.: Material handling technology in pyramid construction. Blocks of stone weighing several tons were transported and assembled at the construction site.
To build the Great Pyramid of Giza, which is 146 meters high and weighs 6 million tons, the Egyptians needed sophisticated material transport equipment capable of moving the massive building blocks and putting them into place. Even today, we still cannot fully explain how this level of precision was achieved using the hoisting equipment and means of transport available around 2700 B.C [1].

1/7

DHL Logbook - in cooperation with Technical University Darmstadt

Around 300 B.C.: Revolutionary Greek rowing vessels – the new foundation of intercontinental trade.
The revolutionary invention of rowing vessels created the basis for rapid travel across the high seas. This invention formed the foundation for the creation of enormous logistics supply systems required by mobile army camps. Using these logistics capacities, Alexander the Great undertook campaigns with his troops, their families and their weapons of war that extended all the way to India [1].

Around A.D. 700: Procurement logistics in the construction of the Mezquita Mosque – pillars came to Spain from all parts of the Islamic empire.
Construction of the famous Mezquita Mosque in



References: [1] Episoden des Logistik-Managements in Antike und Mittelalter | Dülfer 2005. In: Logistik Stories | Göpfert / Froschmayer (Hrsg.) Related articles Trends in the economy as drivers of logistics development URL http://www.dhldiscoverlogistics.com/cms/en/course/origin/historical_development.jsp 7/7

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The Great Pyramid is extraordinary and world renowned, however, not many know about the equally extraordinary Khufu Vessel I, a ship that was found buried and disassembled in a pit next to the Pyramid. This ship is one of the oldest in the world; subsequently it is also the largest and most well preserved ancient boat known to archaeologists (Jenkins, 8). The Khufu vessel is one of the most important sources of information about ancient shipbuilding for archaeologists. The Khufu vessel is a prime piece of evidence of the sophisticated civilization that built it. By the time the Khufu ship was built, there had been a long tradition of shipbuilding, and therefore a…

    • 1630 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pyramids took a little more than twenty years to build. It was very hard to built pyramids. First, they had to prepare the place it was going to be built. Then, they had to take blocks of stone transport them and then place them. Each block was about two to eighteen tons. After that they had to put a casing to smooth the surface. But sadly over the years the casing has disappeared over the years. One really knows how the blocks were put there but there were theories.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    First, we must examine where the stones came from since there’s evidence that some of the stones were brought from hundreds of miles away. In order to move stones hundreds of miles, they used their greatest resource: the very large and powerful Nile River. In a book titled The Pyramids by Miroslav Verner, there’s a chapter titled The Construction of the Pyramids where the author discusses methods that were used to build the Great Pyramids of Giza. According to Verner, the Nile was the quickest and least difficult way to transport stones of these sizes down the river for hundreds of miles (Verner 65). He states that there is written and pictorial evidence that supports the idea that the Nile was used quite often to transport these massive stones (Verner 65). However, the Nile wasn’t the only way stones were brought to the site of Giza. There is evidence that most of the stones used to build the Great Pyramids came from nearby quarries, which is why limestone was chosen as the primary medium for the pyramids (Verner 67). Since limestone was the closest and most abundant medium, it seems plausible why it was primarily used. In order to get the stones up the sides of the pyramids to heights around 400 or more feet, a lot of manpower needed to be used. One of the greatest mysteries behind the construction of the pyramids is how many people worked on the pyramids. We know that in order to…

    • 1346 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Just to pound out the stone 60 to 70 men were needed. To get the stones to the pyramid, the men had to cut slot in the stone then ram pegs in the holes and put water in them. That was the only way they could split the stones with the limited tools they had. They had to lubricate an area to slide the stones to the pyramid by either the men or oxen pulling dragging them. When the stones got to the pyramid site, then the men had to build ramps to be able to get all the stones to the top. The ramps were "wrap-around" style. They couldn’t be straight because you needed wrap around for the upper layers of the great pyramid. They were made of mud brick and had pieces of plaster mixed in to make them harder.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The huge stones used in the construction of the Egyptian pyramids were transported by being pulled over wet sand on wooden sledges. Each Egyptian pyramid consists of millions of 2.5 to 15 ton blocks. The most common theory for how these blocks were moved is that they were placed on wooden sledges and pulled up sand ramps for elevation. When scientists started to test this theory they realized it was unrealistic because the sand caused too much friction and clumped making it almost impossible for the sledge to be pulled. Although, when a team of Dutch engineers was testing out different methods the Egyptians could have used, they might have found an answer to the problem. They discovered that using water to make the sand wet stopped the sand…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There has always been great interest in knowing how the ancient pyramids were built centuries ago. Some of the greatest pyramids are located in Giza, Egypt. One theory, by a man named Dr. Joseph Davidovits, stated that the bricks used to build the pyramids were not carried, but instead the Egyptians carried buckets of slurry, made of lime and a type of concrete to the pyramids and simply poured it into a wooden mold that formed the pyramids bricks. (Davidovits & Morris, 1988) Another theory was made by a historian named Herodotus. Mr. Herodotus stated that the pyramids were constructed in a manner of simply lifting huge bricks, starting from the base, up to the top of the pyramids with levers made of short timbers and rope. (Hodges & Keable, 1993)…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pyramidal construction is as old as Egyptian history itself, going back to the beginning of the 3rd…

    • 1889 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE GREAT PYRAMID OF KHUFU For generations now, people have been wondering how the Egyptians could have built such impressive monuments as the pyramids. Thjere are many different theories as to how they were actually built. in my opinion, alternative #3 by Joseph Davidovits and Margie Morris is the strongest argument because it presents the most convincing evidence about what really happened. They also point out weaknesses in the other two theories. In the first viewpoint, Erich von Daniken believes that there is much to be said against how the Pyramod was built, he suggests that the evidence of the Egyptians building the Pyramids themselves is false. Astronauts from outer space (which were the Egyptian ancestors) came to give knowledge to the people of Egypt. The second viewpoint by Margaret Sears and Clifford Wilson suggests the traditional heave-ho method was used for the Great Pyramid. This consists of the workers cutting the limestone out of the quarry and hauling up to the pyramid and setting it in place. Finally, in viewpoint #3 , Clifford Wilson claims that the casting method was used. The Egyptians would create wooden moulds which would be set in place for when the liquid cement was poured in and left to dry. This would explain how all of the blocks are approximately the same size and have fairly straight edges. Overall, I believe that the third viewpoint makes the most sense and would be the easiest to do in ancient Egypt. It also has the most evidence to back it up.…

    • 1122 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the current century, many opinions have surfaced that have changed the questioning of how these magnificent creations were built. During scientific research in the recent decades, evidence has arrived that challenges alternate theories of how the pyramids were constructed. The results include the discovery of new chemical compounds found in the stone of the temples that lead to an entirely different approach of how the pyramids were built. The theory that will be further discussed in this document is perhaps the most loathed among archeologists. It depicts that the pyramids were built by pouring one of the earliest types of cement cast from synthetic material…

    • 768 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    introduction to history

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Using the technology available during that time period, describe a creative method that would lift the huge limestone blocks that helped to build the great ancient pyramids.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pyramid at Giza is an incredible feat of engineering. This gives us one clear indication that the…

    • 859 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The granite slabs the Egyptians used to build the pyramids weighed forty tons apiece. They were able to move these blocks without the invention of the wheel or cart. It is amazing how the Egyptians built such big structures with such little technology because they were perfect in almost every dimension, it was all done by the physical strength of men, and many of the pyramids still stand today.…

    • 1225 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Aliens Built the Pyramids

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Archeologists suggest that the large stones used in building the pyramids were transported by rolling them over logs or a wet, slippery, clay surface. These methods may have been effective in moving the blocks close to the building site, but do not explain how the massive bricks, weighing as much as a Ford F250 truck, were lifted on top of each other.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sometimes we see more in a person, a story, a character, or a situation than what is presented forth to us. Joseph A. Hynes argues that Charley’s character from Death of a Salesman, by Arthur Miller, is contradicted when he gives a speech in the Requiem. Hynes argues that it, “pulls Charley out of shape,” and, “ends the play by committing Charley to a mellow defense of Willy’s wildest misconception,” but it does not. Charley speaks up in Willy’s defense in a way that is not mellow, nor out of character because he serves as the one person in this play that views Willy from greater angles; who views Willy in depth and realistically. As a man who isn’t loudly spoken as a character, he sees much more to Willy than his family and colleagues, he sees that Willy is a broken man with identity issues but does want to do the right thing and what’s best for his family, so his defense of Willy serves his role as a character.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Khoury, Nuha. 1996. "The Meaning of the Great Mosque of Cordoba in the Tenth century." Muqarnas 13, 80-98.…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Best Essays