Preview

Difference Between Direct And Strategic Leadership Levels

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
775 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Direct And Strategic Leadership Levels
The Army’s definition of leadership is “the process of influencing people by providing purpose, direction, and motivation while operating to accomplish the mission and improving the organization”. We will discuss the three levels of leadership: direct, organizational, and strategic. There is a common principle and practice between the three types of leadership levels. To be a quality leader it is critical to understand the direct, organizational, and strategic levels of Army leadership.
The assignments of leaders become more complex and mutually reliant of each other, require more responsibility, accountability, and authority. A great quote from A Battalion Commander, Operation Just Cause, Panama, 1989,
“More than anything else, I had
…show more content…
These leaders are directly interacting with teams, squads, sections, platoons, companies, troops, and branch through division levels in Table of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) organizations. The TDA is an authorization document developed for non-doctrinal units that prescribes the organizational structure and the personnel and equipment requirements and authorizations of a military unit to perform a specific mission for which there is no appropriate Table of Organization and Equipment (TOE). Direct leaders are close enough to soldiers. They are able to monitor and coordinate team efforts with less complexity and more assurance. They will also provide mission intent. For instance a platoon sergeant is close enough to have a direct influence during scheduled training as well as delegate to subordinates. Being proficient in direct leadership will allow leading through the process of …show more content…
These leaders focus on making policy and system integrations while also making some face-to-face contact. Therefore, they make time to visit distant parts of their organizations to ensure progress toward mission accomplishment and ensuring briefings and reports reflect the same intent. Organizational leaders deal with more complexity due to the amount of soldiers. The number of unintended consequences are increased as well. While problem solving and having a good understanding of the entire range of full-spectrum operations is a must have skill. Organizational leaders must also be competent in synchronizing systems and organizations. These leaders focus on midrange planning and reinforce or reassess the organization’s priorities, such as planning, programming, budgeting, and execution (PPBE). According to ADRP 6-22 “Organizational leaders generally include military leaders at the battalion through corps levels, military and civilian leaders at directorate through installation levels, and Army Civilians at the assistant through undersecretary of the Army

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Csm Command Philosophy

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leadership is an art, not a science. Therefore, we as senior leaders must professionally develop our junior soldiers through experience, counseling and mentoring. We must mentor our soldiers to be ethical standard bearers and to live up to and enforce Army valves. 1. The following statements represent my Leadership Philosophy that we must ensure as Non-Commissioned Officers and leaders of soldiers that we are working as one team to produce the best trained soldiers in the Army. a. Proficient caring leaders: I expect proficient Leaders to demonstrate caring attitudes toward the soldiers in their charge. We must lead from the front and set the example at all times. Caring for soldiers is the foundation of the Army. The most precious asset we have is each other and above all our soldiers in the organization must truly know we care for them and their families. b. Teamwork: As leaders we must work as a team in every aspect of training. Soldiers need to cooperate with each other and become one. A well-disciplined caring team will build cohesiveness, which is a bond that no force can break. Soldiers will not play the Officer against the NCO if they truly understand you are one. I will personally be involved in individual training and will insist we are trained. c. Communication: Along with teamwork, communication is what soldiers normally see as a command failure. Soldiers must be able to use the chain of command and chain of support, both formal and informal. I expect every soldier to utilize communication to its fullest extent. As soon as a leader gives directives to soldiers, I expect the details to be worked out and soldiers to receive the information rapidly. d. Leadership: This is in no way a zero defects business. I expect soldiers to make honest mistakes and learn from the experience… you can expect me to make honest mistakes as well… we will learn together. Leaders are positive, proactive, and look for problems and…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Leadership in war time is a dynamic process. No one particular commander is exposed to the same challenge and implements a textbook solution. While leadership doctrine is provided to commanders, it serves more as a guideline than anything else. This situation can be clearly seen in the leadership and management styles of General Frank Savage and Colonel Keith Davenport. Both of these individuals were faced with the challenge of leading a Bomber Group during World War II. Grossly undermanned and equipped, their directive from command was to give maximum effort and fly their assigned missions until replacement aircraft and personnel could be brought up to the front.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    People in positions of authority need good leaders to execute the mission and the job. General George S. Patton, Jr, one of the best leaders the military has had, said it best, “Never tell people how to do things. Tell them what to do and they will surprise you with their…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The purpose of this paper is to professionally analyze a leader in order to identify how their attributes and competencies impacted their organization and affected my own leadership philosophy. Master Sergeant Retired Roy Benavidez is a leader whose actions positively influenced the United States Army and greatly influenced my leadership philosophy. Benavidez influenced the United States Army by aligning his core attributes, character, presence, and intellect and his core competencies, leads, develops, and achieves with Army doctrine before it existed. Benavidez’s leadership style and personal sacrifices…

    • 1780 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    AbstractThe Army uses all four functions of management through a Chain of Command. All leaders throughout the military use at least one function, but multiple leaders working together covers all functions. Always someone is planning, organizing, leading, or controlling. The reason the United States Military is so effective is because leadership and management always try to stay a step ahead. The rank structure provides a guideline to how much a soldier manages. More rank brings more responsibility, more respect, and more use of each function. Though not all functions are needed to be a manager, a good manager does need all four. The Chain of Command is the best example to show leadership, management, and the four functions - plan, organize,…

    • 1094 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Leadership Process

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Leadership in the Army is a vital part of success. Every single troop in the Army has experience it in one form or another. The processes used to lead help tie every mission, training exercise, and event together. The Orders Process and Troop Leading Procedures are imperative to mission readiness, unit cohesion, and overall achievement in the United States Army.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    There are certain things that you need to know as a leader, I will explain some of the differences facts and opinions about tactical leadership verse organization leadership. Leadership is not just a word or act that is use only in the military, every organization in the world has some type of leadership structure from the small business to the biggest cooperation leadership plays an important roles. I will discuss some of the similarities between the tactical and organizational leadership as it relates to the Army. When we think of leadership in the Army we automatic think of the process of influencing soldiers to accomplish a mission by providing directions, purpose and motivation, but when dealing with tactical or organizational leadership a leader has to think about a different role and take into account the time frame and how they are going to influence their soldiers.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    References: Ambler, G. (December 3, 2006). The Army’s Leadership Framework and Philosophy. Retrieved from http://www.thepracticeofleadership.net/2006/12/03/the-armys-leadership-framework-and-philosophy/…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Leadership is defined as the process in which an individual influences the group of individuals to attain a common goal. The goal is attained by mutual cooperation and behavior. A leader has a sense of positivity and directs others to reach the specified goal. In The Junior Reserve Officers' Training Corps, (JROTC) the leaders teach us how to become better leaders. They also teach us to build character and leadership by providing guidance and putting us cadets in a position that we are not accustomed to. This helps us adapt to new types of things. We also have to set the example for the school, especially when we wear our uniforms. When we put on that uniform it means we are to be a leader. People watch us because we have the uniform on and they know we are a part of JROTC therefore they expect more out of us. A leader is someone who stands not only for their cause but takes responsibility and motivates other individuals also. There is a difference between being a boss and a leader. A leader is a motivation for others and inspires individuals to aim higher and attain that aim. However, a boss only supervises over his inferiors. Power naturally comes to a leader but power has to be earned by a boss. The best leaders are those who can lead and direct without misuse of their power. They must be able to inspire others in a direction or greater good. They must be strong enough to stand firm in decision making and leading others without a selfish attitude. In order to be a successful leader it is essential to have good character. You must have honesty, confidence, communication, and commitment. You have to have honesty because if someone is doing something wrong you need to be able to have honest feedback. You need communication because you need to be able to command your platoon. You need to have commitment because you need to stick with it and create a relationship with your platoon so you, and they, will feel more…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Ww1 Leadership Style

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Leadership is a term that is heavily used in today’s society and is often times overlooked for its true meaning. In our text it is defined as “the ability to influence a group toward the achievement of a vision or set of goals” (Robbins, 01/2012, p. 368). After serving in the Marine Corps for five years I have seen many different leadership styles; some which were effective, and others that were not. The leader that had the most influence on me while serving was a Marine by the name of Major Marcus Mainz. He served as the Operations Officer for my Battalion while deployed to Iraq.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Military leadership isn’t simply about leading a group of individuals to accomplish the mission. On the surface it may seem this way; a barrage of loud, authoritative orders being barked out to brainwashed enlistees. This is how the preponderance of the masses that aren’t associated with the military may see us. However, it’s much, much more than that. Military leadership is about leading individuals to become something more than they ever thought they could be. To develop an individual into one of integrity and excellence. To help them reach goals they never thought possible and to consider a world beyond their own. Truly, there is no other form of leadership quite like it.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    NCOEr ESSAY

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages

    1. The ERS identifies officers and non-commissioned officers who are best qualified for promotion and assignments to positions of higher responsibility. ERS also identifies Soldiers who should be kept on active duty, those who should be retained in grade, and those who should be eliminated DA evaluations focus on an individual Soldier's potential. They are judgments on their ability to perform at current and higher grades, and they are also made to judge whether an officer or NCO should be retained and given greater responsibility in their present grade. Army requirements for leaders: officers and non-commissioned officers frequently change. At times, the Army has a need for leaders with certain backgrounds, experience, and expertise. The size of the Army leader corps by law in terms of strength by grade. Army needs limit the number of selections and assignments that can be made. Thus, a leader’s potential is partially determined by how they compare with their peers. Duty performance. Performance of duty is an extremely important factor in determining a leader’s potential. Duty performance is judged by how well a Soldier performs their assigned tasks and how well they meet Army professional values uniquely established for each respective corps. Leader qualifications. It must be considered in order to meet Army needs for outstanding leaders of troop or technical units, supporting staff managers, and technical specialists. One consideration in determining qualifications is the different skills and backgrounds required by different specialties. Another consideration is a Soldier’s individual progress through specialist fields to positions of greater responsibility. In addition, their length of service, civil schooling, military schooling, or other unique skills required by the Army are considered.…

    • 746 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Core Values Essay

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The core values of the Royal Logistic Corp are Selfless Commitment, Respect for Others, Loyalty, Integrity, Discipline, and Courage which are broken down to the acronym SOLID C. These are the basic values that soldiers in the Royal Logistic Corp are expected to up hold. Since the British Army has been deployed in Iraq and Afghanistan there are numerous examples of these being upheld but it is important for these to be upheld when soldiers are not on Operations.…

    • 501 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the first chapter of her book, Interpersonal Communication Everyday Encounters, Julia T. Woods (2013) examines how various interpersonal communications satisfy basic human needs. She starts off by examining Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs places the most important needs as the Physical Needs for Survival (1968). These include the need for air, food, reproduction, and all the other needs for basic survival as a species. While some of this may be obvious in our communications, i.e. a baby crying because it’s hungry, not all of it is. We are satisfying this need when we speak to our doctors about symptoms we may be having. Communicating our Physical Needs of for Survival is, at its heart, any communication we do that may help us stay alive.…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ! ! Bernie&Ecclestone’s&Formula&for&Formula&One& ! ! Formula!One!motor!racing!!(F1)!is!big!business.!!From!the!first!Grand!Prix!in!1906!it!was!able!to!…

    • 3591 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays