Difference Between Nature And Landscape

Nature and landscape are two interrelated, yet distinct, terms that require careful usage. The meanings of these words have been known to become twisted resulting in a variety of different interpretations. The confusion is sometimes insignificant but is some occasions; it has damning consequences. If landscapes are to be appreciated as nature, what moral implications does the intricacies of language unfold? In doing a quick search on Collins Online Dictionary, the word ‘nature’ brings the complexity of the term quickly to the fore as it spews out 18 possible definitions. The word ‘landscape’, is apparently less intricate, at least in the eyes of the search engine, as it returns a paltry four. Landscape architect Anne Spirn attributes the
This idea that all that is found within nature is moral and just has a number of complications. If landscape, something that is often artificially created by humans, is to be understood as being a part of nature, it means that the intentions of humans can be interpreted as being morally correct, solely because of their inclusion in nature. The effects that this understanding can evoke are discussed in due course. QUOTE ABOUT SYNTHETIC So, can landscape be appreciated as nature? According to Collins, it seems credible as it refers to the word ‘landscape’ as an ‘extensive area of land regarded as being visually distinct’. That implies that any part of nature could be a landscape, therefore landscape could in turn be recognised as nature. The reality is not so
The two writers call for further research to 'focus more deeply on the motivation for environmental rhetoric'. This idea of rhetoric is central. Referring to trusty Collins, there are four possible definitions. It begins a bit lighter with the definition ‘the study of the technique of using language effectively’ and ends with the more damning classification of ‘speech or discourse that pretends to significance but lacks true meaning’. Taking the architecture and design world for example again, the press representatives and media from this realm, as in many other industries, can be said to practice both. Selling a new project or product to the public is not an easy task, whatever one’s attentions are so, one would assume many people try to employ the former definition of rhetoric, but a vast majority may unfortunately end up with the latter. This kind of insinuation can be intentional, or not at all, but the outcome is similar, and that is a confusion of terms, especially in appreciating landscape as nature, and this has significant moral implications. Nadenicek and Hastings suggest that ‘this ambiguous perspective on environmentalism reflects a similar ambiguity in society at large.' Harsh? Perhaps. True? Most definitely. If architects and designers continue to employ empty rhetoric the