Difference Between Philosophical Anthropology And Christian

By definition philosophical anthropology is a part of philosophy that intends to merge the empirical investigations of human nature for the purpose of understanding human beings as both creatures of their own environment and creators of their own values. This area of study questions the human nature and the human condition in order to answer questions regarding human nature by using the diverse humanistic approaches and scientific methods. There are a few similarities, as well as some differences between the psychological and Christian theological understanding of philosophical anthropology.
Both philosophical and theological understanding of philosophical anthropology shows that human actions are the product of the inner processes, however, the difference are in the describing what those inner processes are and how they can be changed. Theology takes a Gods approach; psychology assumes an anti-god approach (Entwistle, 2015). Psychology tends to neglect the spirit realm and Christian theology depends on the spirit to provide the inner
Freud believed that a person’s behavior and feelings were affected by unconscious motives, our childhood greatly influenced our adulthood, and all behavior is determined. The sense of mind is a substantial part in philosophical anthropology given that human intelligence is required for solutions. In a Christian thought, a person’s past does not necessarily predict their future. For a believer in Christ, 1 Corinthians 5:17 states: “This means that anyone who belongs to Christ has become a new person. The old life is gone; a new life has begun! “ (NLT). Meaning that with Jesus everyone has the opportunity to correct and change his or her behavior and thought