Preview

Difference Between Probable Cause And Arrest

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
479 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Difference Between Probable Cause And Arrest
An arrest is defined as the taking of a person into custody against their will for the purpose of criminal prosecution or interrogation. An arrest, similar to searches, can be made with or without the use of a warrant, but regardless of whether or not a warrant was used probable cause must be determined in both cases. The main difference between the two is that in arrests that use a warrant, probable cause has been determined before the arrest by a judge or magistrate. In arrests made without the use of a warrant, the police make the determination of probable cause and have to be able to articulate it at a later point to justify the arrest. If the warrantless arrest is deemed unlawful, and it is found that the person in custody had their constitutional …show more content…

Depending on the jurisdiction there may be a distinction between officers who are on-duty or off-duty at the time of arrest, but generally, officers are authorized to act when the necessary probable cause exists to necessitate intervention. The second element is intent to arrest and although, the intent to arrest exists solely in the mind of the officer, it can be inferred from the facts and circumstances surrounding the encounter with the defendant even if the officer never explicitly told them that they were under arrest. The third element of an arrest is seizure and detention; seizure in this case can be either actual, meaning the officer touched the defendant in some way, and might of even used force, or constructive which means that the arrest was accomplished through words only and there was no physical touching, grabbing, holding, or use of force involved. If a suspect never surrenders to the show of police authority, no seizure has occurred. The last element of an arrest is the understanding by the individual that is being arrested. The test to determine whether a person has been arrested is whether a reasonable person would conclude that the police had restrained the person’s liberty so that they are no longer free to

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Subject to subsection (5) below, no arrest is lawful unless the person arrested is informed of the ground for the arrest at the time of, or as soon as is practicable after, the arrest . Article 5.2 of the ECHR also corresponds with section 28 as it is said that everyone who is arrested must be informed the reason for arrest in a language they understand. Although these requirements have been set out many cases diminished the specified requirements. For example in the case Murray v UK 1995. In this case Murray was arrested and detained without an explanation as to why and despite her rights being breached (ECHR Article5) it was held by the court that no breach was made.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ken Krooks Case Study

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Under what is known as the Plain View Doctrine is called a search-related plain view, referring to items that are identified by the responding officer who was authorized to specifically search for it. In this particular case, the officer was authorized to search for a white, 6’0 tall individual who was wearing a black baseball cap, black t-shirt, and jeans. Even though this description is vague, this individual was in the area of the crime, did match the description, and acted merely suspicious in the officer’s presence. This initially identification is where the detention had occurred in this particular case. The plain view doctrine also states that an officer has the ability to make a warrantless seizure of an object that is involved in a crime if the officer can identify the object in plain view (Terry v. Ohio,…

    • 693 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    b. May a police officer conduct a warrantless search of a suspect’s vehicle if the suspect has been arrested, is…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There are clear rules as to when citizens can and cannot make an arrest. For example, you cannot make an…

    • 5689 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The police did not conduct a lawful search and seizure under the guidelines set forth in the Fourth Amendment. The Fourth Amendment states that search and seizure can occur during an arrest warrant that is being carried out but the "the area within control" of the suspect. The area within control was eventually decided as being the reach of arms length from the suspect. This is a lawful act designed to prevent the suspect from engaging in dangerous behavior towards others and also for the protection of any evidence the suspect may attempt to destroy. The suspect was not at the dwelling when officers arrived therefore no search and seizure should have taken place. Police officers were notified that the suspect was not present upon arrival and entry of the home. There were no reasonable causes for police to suspect that items dangerous to themselves were inside the home.…

    • 552 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Other conditions on the searches incident to arrest exception include the use of force, the search of other individuals with the arrested individual, searching the vehicle of an arrest person, contemporaneousness and inventory searches "if a government agent has probable cause to believe the vehicle contains contraband or evidence of a crime without a warrant" because "in the time it would take to get a warrant, the car, driver and contraband or evidence could be long gone" (Harr, Hess, 2006. p. 231). The 1981 case of Robbins v. California saw the justifications for searching without a warrant. Those specifications include that the mobility of vehicles produce exigent circumstances.…

    • 310 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Running Head: BECAUSE IT’S PROBABLE: REVIEWING PROBABLE CAUSE, WARRANTS, SEARCHES, ARRESTS, AND HOW THEY INTERTWINE.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    united states supreme court ruled that police officers that have a warrant to arrest someone can enter a home just to arrest the person only if they have the reason to believe the person actually lives there. The same standard was applied for officers when they are conducting a parole or probation search. The…

    • 496 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    intention to arrest of the defendant, he either flee or forcibly resist, the officer may use all the…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    False Arrest...Generally speaking, an arrest is defined as any type of situation that you are involved in with an officer where you are not free to leave. If you are under arrest, the next question that should then be asked is what is the reason for the arrest. If the officer does not have a valid reason for arresting you, then you may have a false arrest claim. Take the following example. A police officer sees a young lad standing on the corner, alone, minding his own business. The officer comes up to young man and tells him that he must submit to a search (pat down search). The boy says no and the officer tells him that he must submit. The boy again says no and the officer forces him into the squad car and takes him down to the station. After searching the boy at the station and checking his background, the officer releases him. The young man has a valid false arrest claim. He was arrested without any valid basis whatsoever and brought down into the…

    • 1707 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    P1 FINISHED

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages

    If a police officer is arresting someone in public they do not need a warrant because they have witnesses…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Search Warrants

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Search warrants are a major part of most investigations that take place everywhere in our country. What is a search warrant? It is basically a court order that is issued by a judge or any other type of Supreme Court official that authorizes law enforcement personnel, in most cases police officers, to conduct a search of a person, house, vehicle, or any other type of location. Evidence of a crime is what is mostly being searched for. Authorities will most often confiscate the evidence or objects of the crime.…

    • 2241 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. The officer’s observation of the evidence must be lawful, meaning the officer had a legal right to be at the location, or the suspect did not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the location,…

    • 1555 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are three tiers within the category of seizures, arrest, investigatory stop and a consensual encounter. Both arrest and investigatory stops occur under the Fourth Amendment; however, arrest require justification by probable cause, while investigatory stops only require the mere validation of reasonable suspicion. On the other hand, consensual encounters have impose no restraints of liberty being that it is not ruled by the Amendment, meaning that it requires nothing to have a conversation with an individual. Seizures are more complex than a government official asking an individual a few questions. Before a conversation can be defined as a seizure, the person must no longer agree to…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Fourth Amendment

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, these circumstances must require immediate action. Police officers can enter a home without a warrant to render emergency assistance to an occupant that is injured, to protect them from imminent injury, and if they have a reasonable belief that the person within the house is in need of immediate aid. If the delay in waiting for a search warrant would endanger the police officers lives or the lives of others. Another example of a warrantless search would be when there is sufficient justification that evidence is going to be destroyed. If the police officer is pursuing a suspect from a just-committed crime involving the infliction or threatened infliction of death and/or serious bodily injury and the suspect a private residence, the police officer may enter without a warrant. They may also enter if it is to capture a person who retreats inside when lawfully attempted to detain or arrest the suspect while they are in a public place. If the police officer reasonably believes that a burglar, vandal, arsonist, or other criminal is within private premises committing or attempting to commit a property crime that may result in substantial loss or damage, they do not need to wait for a warrant to enter and prevent or minimize the loss (Rutledge,…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays