Preview

Differences Between Caliphat And Persians

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
648 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Caliphat And Persians
The persians and the Islamic Caliphates had many things in common but also had many things that were different. The first and biggest continuity was that both had religious tolerance but the Islamic Caliphates put a tax on their religious tolerance. Another big Continuity was they both expanded into huge empires but the Islamic Caliphates focused on expanding through education not conquering. Their downfalls showed that their differences hurt and helped their rise and fall. The first continuity was how both the Islamic Caliphates and the Persians were religious tolerant. Religious tolerance means that even after they conquered a people they allowed them to convert to that religion or keep their religion. This was very popular with many empires because people felt less forced to convert and that they were free to continue their religion. This was very helpful because people had less rebellions over religion and many people of different religions got along. The Islamic Caliphates had a …show more content…
Expanding your population and your empire was a very important task back then. The bigger you were the more power you held, and the more people you had the more people were willing to defend that empire. So the more people you had the bigger your military was to defend that empire. More people were willing to fight for their families and their homes. They were not sure if they would be treated in the same way as the Persians and the Islamic Caliphates treated them. However this was the opposite for the Islamic Caliphates. The Islamic Caliphates believed in expanding through education not through conquering like the Persians did. They believed that knowledge is power and that having a bigger army did not mean you were powerful. They felt the being educated was a better weapon then killing others. They believed in enlightening people rather than expanding their empires quickly and

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Ap World History Dbq Essay

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages

    2. How were the three Muslim early modern empires similar? The largest of the three empires, the Ottoman, stretched at its peak in the 17th century from north Africa to southern Russia, and from Hungary to the port of Aden on the southern end of the Red Sea. To the east in what is now Iran and Afghanistan, the Safavid dynasty arose to challenge the Ottomans for leadership of the Islamic world. Finally, yet another Muslim empire in India, centered like most of the earlier ones on the Delhi region of the Ganges plain, was built under the leadership of a succession of remarkable Mughal rulers.…

    • 3685 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sail al-Din began a militant campaign to purify and reform Islam and spread Muslim teachings among the Turkic tribes and the region.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Spread Of Islam Dbq

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page

    Military conquest was one of the primary reasons why Islam spread so quickly. The Document C “Spread of Islam” map shows that between 622 and 750, the Islamic world expanded to Saragossa in the north and as far as Kabul to the east. On the map, there are arrows traveling in many directions. These arrows represent military campaigns. It seems that wherever these arrows go, the land is almost always converted into Islamic territory, therefore, the army’s operations prove to be successful. The significant amount of land claimed shows that the Islamic troops are a force to be reckoned with. According to the Document F al-Baladhuri excerpt, “Hereclius gathered [a] large Byzantine army … numbering about 200,000...By Allah’s help, some 70,000 of them…

    • 206 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Both Persia and Greece were very influential during 600 BCE-600 CE. They were both very similar and different in their political and economical areas, and they also had similarities in differences in their social life. Politically, Persia and Greece were very different in the way that Persia was ruled by a king while in Greece each polis was governed separately. Now economically, Greece depended on imported goods, and Persia was mainly an agriculture based economy. Their social lives also had similarities and differences, but one of the main similarities was the males role in daily life.…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian Empire held together a huge empire using a combination of effective ruling techniques. The Persians succeeded where most of the ancient world failed. Persia became successful because of its tolerance, their government, and their prosperous economy. Persia sought out to create a kinder kingdom and did not destroy local cities and states for their own selfish gain.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There were many similarities and differences between Byzantium and the Middle East and East Asia. Both regions were based on religions that were founded by prophets, but Byzantium and the Middle East had religions that were monotheistic, and East Asia did not. They also differed in the fact that the Middle East and Byzantium focused on academic development, and East Asia focused on military development, but were similar because both developed new ways to use projectile weapons.…

    • 490 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian Empire, founded by Cyrus the Great in the 6th century BC, was the largest empire of the ancient world, stretching from the borders of India and China in the east to large parts of Greece and Libya.The empire was divided into provinces called satrapies.They respected the people they conquered.The timeframe is 550-330 b.c..Persian government was a monarchy system in which the kings had the final say so in how things were supposed to be handled. The first king through 559-529 BCE and the last king ruled from 336-330 BCE. The empire was divided into twenty provinces each ruled by a governor.The economics were that they had a road system and has developed the use of coins, a system of weights, and a measurement system.They also switched to a barter system but China did it first.Also each satrapy paid taxes based on wealth and resources.A satrapy system was an administrative group. A satrap (governor) administered the region, a general supervised military, and a…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    As we can tell, the Persian Empire had improved economically, politically, and socially due to the Persian Wars of Expansion. Economically, the empire had improved in trade from gaining more land. Politically, the emperors that ruled over this period of time had helped the economic growth as well as having more power over people. Socially, the empire’s cultural ideas and social beliefs had been widespread and influenced other countries around because of the people that practiced the same beliefs on this vast amount of…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Persian had a strong government at the heart of its driving force. The Federalistic idea of the people kept the empire together during times of peace and times of war. They did everything for ‘Mother Persia’ and did so to keep their freedom. Their freedom in government they could rural over civil affairs and command the army in war. Kings could then appoint a secretary and military commander in each satrapy, or district. These districts is what kept the large empire even more tightly together. Each of these empires had a governor, or Satrap. Also each satrapy was appointed an inspector to report on what has going on in each. Their success was put on the royal roads that could carry them from one side to the other in less than two weeks --an accomplishment in that day-- made swift travel and greater messaging for the empire. There government worked well and is glue that kept the empire together and kept it alive for hundreds of years.…

    • 1023 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We are also introduced to the main character's family, such as his wife Elaine, and his son Jamie. We also see what each person's role is within the family.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The neighboring Byzantine and Persian empires were weak is a main point because the Muslims could defeat them more easily, as they had been fighting each other for a long time and by the time they faced the Muslims both empires were exhausted by war.…

    • 341 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Political power means having an authority controlled by a group of individuals within a society that grants the use of public resources and execute policies on behalf of the society. This power can be obtain by means of government or opposition to a government institution. In the U.S constitution there are numerous restraints of political power. This paper identifies and explains the general constitutional restraints on political power found in the U.S. constitution.…

    • 765 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Late Antique Period

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Religion, specifically the rise and evolution of Abrahamic monotheism (Christianity, rabbinic Judaism, and Islam), is the defining characteristic, of this era. Religions of the Late Antique period were linked with power and entered into a weird dance between politics and faith. Imperial monotheism served as a rallying cry and the building block of empires. Religion was used equally as a tool for salvation, either of the individual or the community, and to justify law. Constantine and the Christians, the Jews of the Himyarite Dynasty in Arabia, the Manicheists who tried to court the Persians, and even the Zoroastrians who were keen to court their Iranian overlords, all sought to solidify their power, control, and government over regions of conquered peoples by using religion as an emulsifier of different tribal/cultural groups and a tool of state control. Each religion created empires of varying sizes and strength that were bound by the socio-political idea of religion and conversion of the conquered (especially in the case of Christianity). In this light, Islam did not seal the end of Late Antiquity, but rather continued one of its most famous features: conquest and expansion using religion as a justification. The Islamic conquests, so often viewed as the ending of Late Antique era, fit precisely into this mold. By conquering new peoples and forcing their conversion to Islam as a way to strengthen…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    During the period 600 CE to 1450 CE, the process of by which the Islamic Empire and the Mongol Khanates built and maintained their empires was different in that the ways the leaders governed and what sets of laws were used to govern but was similar in that they both depended heavily on military force for expansion and security.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Umayyad and Abbasid were similar and different politically and socially. Both valued merchants highly, and were both bureaucratic. However, the Abbasids believed the the Caliph should be a blood line, while the Umayyads believed it should be by the best ruler.…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays