Preview

Differences Between Cattle And Mad Cow Disease

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
207 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Differences Between Cattle And Mad Cow Disease
Great Britain and other European countries have killed millions of cows over the past 15 years to prevent two diseases from spreading. The first disease is Foot-and-Mouth disease. The second disease is Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE), also known a Mad cow disease. Mad cow disease is a brain disorder in adult cattle that may spread to humans through diseased cow products.

Both diseases are different, but dangerous. Foot-and-Mouth is contagious, but it rarely affects humans and isn't fatal to livestock. Mad cow disease, which was first discovered in 1986 in the United Kingdom, isn't contagious, but it kills the infected animals and humans.

Since the cattle could have been contaminated, they couldn't have been used for meat or

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Cattle are infected by eating food that have remains of other animals like cattle and sheep…

    • 477 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Boneless Chuck Roast

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First the cow must be slaughtered before anything is done. Different manufactures have different processes of doing this. Some of which are humane and some are inhumane. The most humane way is to use a captive bolt device which stuns them and renders them unconscious.…

    • 723 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wgu Biochemistry Task 2

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages

    • Label cattle as “inspected and passed,” only if they’ve been tested negative for BSE (“Your Comprehensive Source for BSE Facts”). Sources Cited Hudson-Miller, D. (n.d.). Dehydration and Hydrolysis. Retrieved January 4, 2015, from https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qlFyeosYpUSw4gJwgZ3g3XdPu3 _ OuLubIuZlPlDohTc/edit Material Safety Data Sheet. (2005, October 10).…

    • 839 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    10- Chapter 11: Lethal Gift of Livestock A stable source of food like livestock can have a lot of negative consequences. Although food production spread at unequal rates, many people gained access to it right away. Naturally, it seemed like a good thing because the population size was increasing while the supply of food was slowly getting lower. This allowed people to gain access to a variety of foods from plant and animal domestication. However, what those people didn’t know was that human diseases were linked to animal origins.…

    • 404 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Anthrax used to kill millions of sheep and cows in france and undoubtedly more in the rest of the world. It was a huge economic drain for herdsman and could be dangerous to humans as well.…

    • 175 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Next time you buy meats or vegetables from a corporate supermarket just think it may be loaded with antibiotics and/or harmful bacteria that may cause you to get sick or may even take your life, not to mention the inhumane or unhealthy conditions that the animals are kept in which in return pollute our air and water.…

    • 940 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pox Americana

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages

    -eating and drinking the milk of live stock supplied Europe with a lot of diseases…

    • 310 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The history of horse meat for human consumption in the United States has a similar story.…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    an average quality hay is 24 pounds per head and the hay that they are consuming is 88% dry matter. 1,200 pound cows consume 27 pounds per head per day on an as-fed basis. growing feed crops for livestock consumes 46% of water in the US grass fed is more demanding on the land than grain feed it has more impact on the environment because it takes eight more months for it to be ready to be slaughtered that's more waste and water. It only takes 15 months for grain and 22 month for grass because with grain they get fat faster. the government kills other animals for more land. (wild horses are caught elephants were killed. ) cattle alone eat 45 billions gallons of…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Symptoms to the cow for Mad Cow Disease is very intense. The cow may show a lot of nervousness and aggression which change the attitude and behavior of the animal. There will be abnormal posture and will cause a lot of coordination problems. The disease of the cow will cause them to reduce milk production. In addition, the cattle will not be able to nurse their young and the farmers will lose their production of calves and profits. Eventually severe moaning will set in and lead to death.(www.cattle.com)…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    No one likes to suffer. None of us like to feel pain, but factory farmed animals such as cows, pigs, and chickens experience great pain in their short-lived lives. The website factoryfarming.com, states, “a standard beef slaughter house kills 250 cattle every hour.” The method used is “stunning” this is done by using a catapult gun and giving the cows a mechanical blow to the head. It is to render them unconscious, but this procedure is terribly imprecise: “as a result, conscious animals are often hung upside down, kicking and struggling, while a slaughterhouse worker makes another attempt to render them unconscious. Eventually the animals will be ‘stuck’ in the throat with a knife, and blood will gush from their bodies whether or not they are conscious” (factoryfarming.com). An animal has an intrinsic value, and to dismiss that, is morally wrong. How do we kill others that value their life? People may say it’s the cow’s…

    • 549 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    It took sixteen (16) years before the authorities in agriculture pointed out what is causing the disease into the cattle. “Rendering”, recycling of animal parts that usually go to waste was turned into high protein feed for herbivores like the cows, sheep, and goats. This process was stopped on year 2000. Disregarding the dietary boundaries of animals caused bad effects on the animals itself and into humans as well by consuming their meat.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Fast Food Nation Analysis

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages

    This book is different from the other books I’ve read in my past English classes because the author supports and backed his claims and facts with evidence. Workers at slaughter houses would use lack of health care to treat the meat which caused infectious diseases. From pg. 195 the author talks about the foodborne disease which is very common. Every day in the United States, roughly 200,000 people are sickened by a foodborne disease, 900 are hospitalized, and fourteen die.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Deer farming should not be allowed because it has severely helped to spread Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD).Many other diseases also are found more in captive deer than in wild deer. Some of these other diseases are Tuberculosis, and Brucellosis. Chronic Wasting Disease is a neurological and fatal disease that stops the deer from functioning until it can't walk or eat. A lot more cases of Chronic Wasting Disease are found in captive or farmed deer at testing centers.…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bill McKibben’s essay “The Only Way to Have a Cow” establishes a sense of comfort as his approach to the meat eating controversy is superbly logical. The current industrial approach to livestock has birthed an issue pertaining to the sustainability and healthy feeding of our lives. Yet there is another problem in relation to our consumption, which tends to be overlooked. If the pricing of meat reflected in the damage done to our environments, feedlot beef would cost more than grass-fed beef both financially and environmentally. It is the rapid, inhumane dietary feeding of the cow which is insulting, not the consumption of it, and taking no responsibility for the run-off is an offense to the earth and it’s inhabitants. These costs alone are part of the reasoning for the current system which is inefficient and uneconomically feasible. The…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays