Preview

Diplomacy at Work

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
794 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Diplomacy at Work
Diplomacy at Work

In today 's world political society, the use of diplomacy is a tool that allows countries to work out their differences in an attempt to avoid war.
Diplomacy is often one of the last steps taken by two nations before a war begins or even during a war to stop a conflict. A terrific example of diplomacy and when it is used, is the controversy between the Israelis and the
Palestinians in the Mideast. These two countries have been at arms for years and have just recently used diplomacy as a tool to settle their differences. Basically, diplomacy is a function of national power. This view was stated by Hans J. Morgenthau and supported in his essay, The Future of Diplomacy.
Diplomacy, in the eyes of Morgenthau, is fourfold. First of all, diplomacy must take in respect the objective and the means by which it can be attained. For example, if a weak nation is trying to use diplomacy, it must first determine how much power it has in relation to the country it is dealing with, and if it 's goals are attainable with that amount of power. Secondly, Morgenthau says that a nation must also take into respect the power of the other nation and the goal it is trying to reach. Basically, all he is saying is that a country must also take into interest the objectives and capabilities of the opposing nation.
Thirdly, he states that diplomacy must determine how compatible the two nations needs are. In simpler terms, diplomacy determines whether or not two nations can come to a compromise with the issues at hand. Finally, Morgenthau says that diplomacy must include the proper steps to achieve a certain goal. Without one of these components it is believed by Morgenthau that the diplomacy system would fail; thus, not solving the problem of the two countries in its entirety. An excellent example of diplomacy between nations is that of the
Palestinian and Israeli nations. The leaders of the these two nations, Yasir
Arafat (Palestine) and Minister



Bibliography: Contreras, Joseph. "Toothless in Gaza." Newsweek 9 September 1996: 49. Cooperman, Alan and David Makovsky. "A Mideast Odd Couple." U.S. News & World Report 9 September 1996: 34-35. Schmemann, Serge. "Netanyahu Meets With P.L.O. Leader." The New York Times 8 September 1996: A1 & A8.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    existing between the United States and those powers to declare that we should consider any attempt on…

    • 5678 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History 1378 Review Terms

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Appeasement – the policy of acceding to the demands of a potentially hostile nation in the hope of maintaining peace…

    • 1296 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Last but not least the Cuban missile crisis. The Russians gave bombs to Cuba that could wipe out America and we didn’t like that. So we took action and asked them to remove the bombs from Cuba so we could have a little piece of mind as stated in document 8.…

    • 435 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    alliances. "Covenants of peace be quickly arrived at so that this war can end and future nations…

    • 520 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    1. Identifying and defining the problem. Consider what an optimal outcome or goal might be.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    with ending the conflict. An example of such is by how a Canadian diplomat named Lester B…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nations pursue national interest according to their agenda. A nation’s agenda needs to be promoted to be accomplished, however, depending on the plan, it can provoke conflict. When this conflict is unnecessary to the nation or it conflicts with other nations, that’s when the plan should no longer be perused and other options should be explored.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    this as a bargaining factor when a country has not behaved the way we have agreed upon such as…

    • 664 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson introduced the term “moral diplomacy” to the West which attempted to spread influence and control foreign nations by using economic power. This didn’t always work as planned especially when things got tough and “moral diplomacy” alone wasn’t enough to fight off problems.…

    • 1656 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Princeton University (2006) defines diplomatic negotiations as between nations. The lesson learned by the Americans was the need to communicate with their enemy. Our military leaders and president, Lyndon Johnson, used bombing as “verbal” negotiations with Vietnam. Neither the Americans nor the Vietnamese were willing to compromise and enter into discussions. This refusal to enter into talks led to millions of deaths. The Vietnam War could have been avoided entirely or ended much sooner had the negotiations taken place.…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Melian Dialogue

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The situation in which the Melians find themselves may appear to be relatively simple; however, the convoluted underpinnings that make up the conflict address the most profound theories behind interstate relations. The heart of all wars is the conflict over things that states value such as territory and policies. Therefore war’s ultimate purpose is to obtain rather than fight. The process in which states attempt to resolve conflicts is referred to as bargaining.1 In this case, the dialogue is an example of crisis bargaining, in which one actor threatens the use of force. The Melian dialogue is a discussion over the bargaining range of the two actors, that is, what each side is willing to give up or accept over the use of military force.2 Although the Melians raise several liberalist arguments addressing their common interests, the Athenians dominate the dialogue by discussing the most basic…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Vietnam War

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In this paper it will explore lessons learned when dealing with diplomatic negotiations, presidential leadership, and cultural/social contexts. During the Vietnam War the United States did not realize the high level of intelligence that the Vietnamese people had and how much their culture and nationalism meant to them. They did not want the United States interfering with their country but some of the leaders in charge felt that the United States could help since they were offering monies and military advisors in regard to the conflicts between North and South Vietnam.…

    • 622 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Peace can be a funny thing, especially if you are the nation being used as a bargaining chip. Take the for example Germany’s occupation of Czechoslovakia before and during World War II. An attempt to avoid war at all costs caused the dismemberment of the country’s territories and erosion of national identity and culture.…

    • 1745 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Camp David - Case Study

    • 6056 Words
    • 25 Pages

    Bibliography: Caplan, Neil and Laura Zittrain Eisenberg. Negotiating Arab-Israeli Peace. Bloomington, IN: Indiana UP, 1998. Princen, Tom. “Camp David: Problem-Solving or Power Politics as Usual?” Journal of Peace Research. vol 28, no 1. 1991. 57-69. Putnam, Robert D. “Diplomacy and Domestic Politics.” Double-Edged Diplomacy. Ed. Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacobson, and Robert D. Putnam. Berkeley: California UP, 1993. 431-468. Quandt, William B. “Camp David and Peacemaking in the Middle East.” Political Science Quarterly. vol 101, no 3. 1986. 357-77. Quandt, William B. Camp David: Peacemaking and Politics. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1986. Raiffa, Howard. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP, 1982. Stein, Janis Gross. “The Political Economy of Security Agreements.” Double-Edged Diplomacy. Ed. Peter B. Evans, Harold K. Jacobson, and Robert D. Putnam. Berkeley: California UP, 1993. 77-103. Stein, Kenneth W. Heroic Diplomacy. New York: Routledge, 1999. Telhami, Shibley. “Evaluating Bargaining Performance: The Case of Camp David.” Political Science Quarterly. vol 107, no 4. 1992-93. 629-53. Telhami, Shibley. “The Camp David Accords.” Pew Case Studies in International Affairs. Washington, DC: Institute for the Study of Diplomacy, 1992. The Camp David Accords and Related Documents. Chaim Herzog Center for Middle East Studies and Diplomacy, 1998. Touval, Saadia. The Peace Brokers. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, 1982.…

    • 6056 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pacem in Terris

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages

    * countries recourse to guns/weapons to resolve conflicts among themselves rather than by negotiation to settle problems and misunderstandings…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics