According to the American Speech-Hearing-Language …show more content…
He believes that a group that does not portray all of these characteristics can not be considered a discourse community (220-222). Others, including myself, think that his definition is too strict. James E. Porter has a much broader definition of a discourse community in stating that “a discourse community is a group of individuals bound by a common interest who communicate through approved channels and whose discourse is regulated” (400). In simpler terms, it is a group of people with a common interest working towards a common goal. By knowing this definition, it is clear how speech, language, hearing, and processing are the main discourse communities within communication disorders. They are each separate groups with separate goals, but also have smaller groups within …show more content…
People in this discourse community struggle to produce “normal” speech and work toward the goal of being able to speak properly. The smaller distinctions within speech disorders are articulation, fluency, and voice. People within the articulation discourse community struggle with producing proper speech sounds or consonant and vowel sounds. People within this community would be people with lips, people who have difficulty with blends or any other issue of the sort. Fluency disorders disturb the flow of speaking and can also include tension and mannerisms. This disorder can be described by the rate at which people speak, their rhythm, and repetitions. The main example of this sort of disorder is stuttering. Lastly, another discourse community is voice disorders. This has to do with people who have an abnormal voice for the individual. This can mean that a person’s voice has an atypical tone, volume, or quality for his/her age and/or