Preview

Discretion And Court Cases

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
729 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discretion And Court Cases
Week 3 IW “Discretion & Court Cases”

Discretion & Court Cases Discretion varies in each profession just as it does in each jurisdiction. It is how a person in an authoritative position conducts themselves and what they do in accordance with their profession and with ethical obligations as well as the law. Disparity is a major player in the terms of discretion which includes Race, Ethnicity, Gender, and Age. First and foremost society has set the mind frame for this which flows into the courtroom and also statistics have been proven to back up some of this stereotyping ("Reducing racial disparity," 2008). Disparity is ethically wrong but it clearly happens every day in the court. Starting with this
…show more content…
Having the ability to set the criteria/agenda for the others involved in the team influences what information will be used to control the case (Neubauer, Ph.D. & Fradella, Ph.D., 2014). The Defense Attorney must do research to see if laws have been reformed and to see what other cases are similar that could support or hurt their case. Defendants and victims can have predisposed opinions because of social or class status and previous cases. The defendant and the victim do have some of their own rights in the case. The defendant can decide for instance to take a plea or not, or to take the stand or not. The victim at times may not have so much freedom as once a case is in the States’ hands the State will proceed even if the victim changes his/her mind in some cases. Such as domestic violence, a partner may decide not to proceed but the state can proceed even when the victim does not want to testify if there is hard evidence the Prosecutor can win the case. Discretion has a domino effect and starts with the victim because if the victim leaves something out or lies then they are using their discretion which can make or break the case. The attorneys must use their discretion for proving the case and for defending the case. The judge uses his/her discretion to pass sentence which has been in some form shaped through …show more content…
Using discretion is doing what is right or wrong just as one does with their morals and ethics in their profession. Disparity is seen through the criminal justice system by all players even legislature (The Sentencing Project, Research and Advocacy for Reform, 2008). Police officers are usually the first persons to deal with criminals and that is where discretion starts in the physical presence. Discretion and disparity are under scrutiny and will remain so. Discretion must be used and there has to be a routine check on

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The exercising of discretion by all system actors, public and private, and from the nature of the criminal process itself is a result of case attrition. Basically, case attrition is when an arrest does not end in a trial conviction, which happens quite often in the court justice system. This is not new experience, nor one limited to the United States; several other Western countries and in the early parts of the twentieth century reported the same high rates of case attrition (encyclopedia.com). The effect case attrition has on the criminal justice system is observed at the different levels of the criminal justice process, because an arrest or no arrest affects everything.…

    • 318 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    For example, he or she usually spends a substantial amount of time interviewing their customers before hearings or trials. In the event a prosecutor provides an offender a plea bargain, a defense lawyer is accountable for speaking about the deal with the offender.…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Discretion In Cjs

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Discretion plays an indispensable role in the criminal justice system (CJS). Discretion is the judgment or decision implemented through values, facts, and principles. In the CJS, it is the authority given to a decision maker to decide between alternatives or no alternatives. Discretion can be used by police in the area of the criminal investigation process. Its role is continuous from sentencing judgments to the point of detaining offenders in prison past their sentencing period. Discretion also allows individuals’ circumstances to be considered, as the law at times can be considered a blunt measurement in delivering an alternative. This demonstrates that discretion plays an important role in the CJS to enforce the law, whilst taking into account the rights of individuals.…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Police discretion is the opportunity for police officers to exercise choice in their enforcement activities. Discretion of today’s police officers normally reflects the departments and the policing profession as a whole in a negative fashion.…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Prosecutorial Discretion is the prosecuting attorney having complete authority on the turnout of a case. The prosecuting attorney has discretionary power over matters that involve "whether or not to bring criminal charges, deciding the nature of the charges, plea bargaining, and sentence recommendation" (U.S. Legal Inc, 2016, p. 1). Prosecutors are not obligated to take a victims accusations and represent it in front of a jury. However, the prosecutor is obligated to listen to the story, analyze the evidence, and then decide if they want to move ahead with the case (Bazelon, 2006, p. 2). The discretion comes into action when the prosecutor has analyzed the evidence and learns whether or not the case can be won with the evidence provided.…

    • 633 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Kathryn’s duty to do justice as the prosecutor, also applies during plea bargaining, whereby, a persons guilt must be established based on proof beyond a reasonable doubt. As such, the prosecutor’s primary objective “is to avoid punishing an innocent person. Because a prosecutor is obligated to act in all stages in the criminal justice process consistently with the sovereign's view that it is more important to avoid punishing the innocent, this principle applies to a prosecutor's efforts in resolving cases pre-trial” (Stern 1034). Regardless of how confident the prosecutor is of the defendant’s guilt, the prosecutor must ensure he does not offer a plea bargain that would result in an innocent individual to plead guilty as such an offer would subordinate the purpose of preventing an innocent individual from being punished to that of punishing a guilty individual, “thereby failing to strike the balance that justice requires” (Stern 1035). O’Hear suggests that a defendant should have the opportunity to convey their side of the story in order for the defendant to avoid getting convicted if they are innocent. It would also be beneficial to enhance the defendants perceptions of procedural justice by developing an objective criteria in order to direct plea negotiations and explain the prosecutors…

    • 1578 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Once being sentenced defendants can share issues, some can be ethical concern regarding how our judicial system is functioning. Ethical concerns come within the judicial system which can be range from discretion, use of force, corruption and police misconduct. These concerns are definitely affecting our judicial system and how it can impact the system as the whole from convicted to the outsider who can lose respect and faith on our government.…

    • 5065 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Definition of judicial restraint, mention Marbury V Madison (1803). Set out argument strict constructionists argue that the SC should stick to the original intentions of the FF whilst loose constructionists argue that the SC must reinterpret the Constitution in order to move with the times and bring it up-to-date. Judicial restraint has an impact on many members of US society that are not protected under the original Constitution. Main- All decisions whether restrained or activist have huge political significance. E.g. abortion, Rights of African Americans, etc. If restrained, the court can turn away cases and choose not to even hear them. The SC can pick and choose (they only choose between 90-100 cases to hear a year). Liberals argue…

    • 527 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    I believe that the judicial restraint philosophy is more appropriate for federal judges to follow because, unlike judicial activism, it does not allow judges to expand vague Constitutional principles to fit their own viewpoint and principles. Judicial restraint does not authorize judges to interpret Constitutional texts and laws (conservative or liberal interpretation) in order to serve their own principles, policies, and considered estimates of the vital needs of contemporary society. The judicial restraint policy also ensures that separation of powers is applied justly so that different branches of government do not intervene with the power of the other branch. Also, because the Stare Decisis has a huge impact on future decisions and precedent,…

    • 249 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    discretionary powers

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The discretionary aspect for police officers results in them taking different actions for the same type of delinquencies. However, the steps they take will be similar, if not the same, in cases where crimes are involved. Unfortunately, there is also the possibility of police abusing their discretionary powers or that they base their decisions on sex, race, or socioeconomic status as some believeIt is well known that police officers have broad discretionary powers. This applies equally to delinquencies as well as juvenile crimes. The action a police officer will take depends on various factors such as the behavior of a juvenile and/or the officers observations of suspicious activities and so on. Law enforcement officers are encountering a number of delinquent behaviors among children. Offenses can range from small status offenses to serious crimes. Officers’ discretionary power is allowing them to either reprimand and release a juvenile or transport him/her to detention for referral to juvenile court. Depending on the circumstances, officers are empowered to determine if they should…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Judges have to make many discretionary decisions while they are on the bench. This is due to the fact that the law, no matter how well it is written, cannot anticipate every circumstance and eventuality that may be subject to that law. As a result, Judges are charged with making rational decisions in regards to the cases that don’t adequately fit the ramifications of the law. Most of the decisions that are made by Judges are independent of official guidelines and vary from Judge to Judge. This is due to the fact that when someone is charged with making a rational choice there are three tiers that have to be met: the decision maker must have a certain goal that they want to obtain from the decision, they must have alternative options other than the decision that they make and lastly they must have…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Court Decisions

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I chose Drug testing programs for welfare applicants. The reason I chose this is because I happen to agree with doing so. I disagree with the junction that the judge put in saying that it is “likely unconstitutional”. I feel this because I am a strong supporter in helping those who are in need, not those that are abusing the help. As a mother of two, and have been on state assistance for help, I often would see those that are known offenders of the system, and find it very disheartened over the fact that we are helping those that are not willing to help themselves.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Police Discretion

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Looking at the criminal justice system as a whole, I find that the police officers are the ones who exercise the most discretion. They maintain the ability to enforce the law at anytime and anywhere, in uniform and out of uniform. For example, they are the ones who make the decisions regarding who they will pull over and who they will arrest. They must make a discretionary decision on what to do about a crime in progress if, for instance, they are out of uniform shopping with their family. There can be quite a number of important decisions facing them everyday, especially if they are not in their uniforms.…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In performing their duties, police are allowed to use a wide range of discretion. Police discretion “is defined as the power enjoyed by a public officer to make a choice among possible courses of action or inaction”(Green & Kelso, 2010). Using police discretion, officers can decide whether to make an arrest, and make decisions about the amount of force to use during an altercation. Factors that affect these decisions are race/ethnicity, the seriousness of the offense, the suspect’s demeanor, poverty and social marginality, the desires of the complainant, the rule of law and policy issues and organizational norms, and neighborhood characteristics Police discretion can be harmful as some police officers intentionally use their powers of discretion…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sentencing and punishment has actively involved the discretion of judges and magistrates in affecting the decision of the sentencing. Discretion involves the power of Judges and magistrates to determine the most appropriate sentence for a case. Allowing judicial officers to decide sentences on a case by case basis and thus permitting them to take into account the various circumstances. Many factors influence the role discretion plays or alternatively doesn’t play in the sentencing and punishment of offenders. This includes statutory guidelines, mandatory sentencing, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the use of victim impact statements.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays