Preview

Discuss How Shakespeare Presents Henry and Explores Renaissance Idea Concerning Kingship and Society

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1955 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Discuss How Shakespeare Presents Henry and Explores Renaissance Idea Concerning Kingship and Society
Using a close Analysis of 4:1 as a starting point and material from the play as a whole, discuss how Shakespeare presents Henry and explores Renaissance idea concerning kingship and society. Include some consideration of how modern audience’s response may compare to that of a contemporary audience.

In “Henry V” Shakespeare presents a figure that symbolises the ideal monarch as expressed by writers like Bodin and Erasmus. In a renaissance society it is believed that each king is appointed king by God, through divine right, and so the king has absolute authority to be God’s power on earth. However Henry harbours doubts over his right to be king for he is the son of the usurper of the crown. This presents the idea of a ‘twice born’ king as Henry publicly appears confident in his rule and private insecure in his right. As Edward Plowden writes, “A king has in him two bodies…a body natural and a body politic.” Henry’s political side understands the importance of his role as king, despite any doubts he has, which is why his speeches and actions at Agincourt show an awareness of the importance of social cohesion, as he tries to make the men forget their fears and social boundaries to fight for England.

In act 4:1 Shakespeare presents three different groups of the base level of society in different ways to the disguised Henry. Shakespeare strategically places the dialogue between Henry and Pistol on the eve of the war to act as comic relief. When Pistol and Henry speak there is an apparent reversal in power, for Pistol claims he is as ‘a gentleman as the emperor’ and Henry claims to be a, “a gentleman of company.” Henry speaks in prose to support his character, and Pistol, as usual speaks in verse suggesting nobility, ironically the audience know Pistol is anything but noble. Henry discovers Pistol still has, ‘love’ as he shows no resentment towards the king for Bardolph’s death whereas he blames Fluellen for Bardolph’s demise. This loyal sentiment contrasts Pistols

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    To some extent Henry VII was successful in dealing with the challenges to his royal authority in the years 1485 to 1509. However, there were also limitations to this success. This essay will evaluate Henry’s actions, meaning that a conclusion can be drawn on how effective they in fact were.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Henry was using his meaningful speech that arises from his spirit to convey more trust to his followers. This speech was a good example to show how Henry and all other strong feudal rulers in this era used their strength and unique personalities to amaze and persuade but not to force their people to become their followers. The unique and the highly effective speech and the thoughts of Henry v shows how open were individuals in Elizabethan era about expressing themselves to reveal social or political viewpoints.…

    • 87 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s “Richard III” exists as a providential narrative in support of the Tudor Myth; that it was only through the divinely sanctioned rule of Henry VII that brought about peace after an era of turmoil under the reign of Richard III. As such, Shakespeare’s pro-Tudor bias highlights the politically and morally absolutist agenda of his time.…

    • 1036 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Throughout the history of time, there have been many leaders of the world’s different civilizations. While each leader may have possessed different qualities: some strong, others weak; some righteous, others corrupt…each rule played an important part in shaping the culture of that civilization. Though not every civilization was governed by a leader that had a worldly impact, the rule of England under King Henry VIII, was one of great historical importance. Unlike many leaders of his time, Henry’s legacy was not forged under the motivation of power and greed, but by love and his desire to have a male heir. Henry VIII became the King of England in 1509 after the death of his father Henry VII. Like most kings Henry desired to have a male heir,…

    • 967 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the play King Henry IV part 1, Shakespeare reflects both sides of Prince Harry, and his reformation that guide him to be a great King. In the beginning King Henry states; “When honor speaks, it speaks about Hotspur. I can only see my own son, Harry, and his reputation for wildness and dishonor.” Harry is known as a disgrace, his days consist in being a thief and not behaving as an honorable prince. He accepts himself as a disaster; and no one thinks that his capacity and attitude can lead him to be a great man with a clever plan. By the middle of the play he exposes his great secret; “I’ll be so wild, I’ll make wildness an art form, then redeem myself when the world least expects me to.” His elaborate plans consist in exhibiting the worst…

    • 309 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unitplan

    • 5013 Words
    • 21 Pages

    What are the major themes – what does this say about Shakespeare as a writer? Conclusion: (10 min) 4) Teacher to explain the homework: (see Assignment) Assignment / Project: 5) Each student is to read / skim over Act 4 -Write in journal – (to be handed in for marks)…

    • 5013 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shakespeare’s focus is characterisation and valuing honour and loyalty to the monarch in the context of performance…

    • 1311 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What Was Henry Viii's Rule

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The successes of Henry VIII can be seen in his ability to keep and gain power and the force of his military efforts.To determine if Henry’s rule was a success, we must define what success means in the context of a ruler. This argument identifies the goals set forth by Henry, and his ability to achieve these goals. It’s also worthwhile to note the state and legacy that his rule left upon England. The reasons we can call Henry VIII’s reign a success will be laid out in his personal, political, religious and military accomplishments while on the throne. Henry’s reign can be defined by his ability to indulge in his desires. Whether that was to take and hold power, spend money on luxuries and war, or to consume more food in his later years. He had a number of personal desires beyond living a life of luxury, namely to have an male heir to the throne. Despite troubling history of marriage, he was successful in not only producing one heir, but three: Edward VI, Mary I, and Elizabeth I.Henry was successful in using fear to make those seeking to undermine think…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The characters, namely Richard III and Richmond, offer an insight into the contextual concerns of the Elizabethan period. Their values offer modern audiences the opportunity to identify contextual features because the values are a product of the context, as is the text itself. Richard III is the epitome of the villain. He values deceit, devilishness, power and a disconnection from God and family which is against everything the pious Elizabethans believed in and this is depicted through his actions and language “I am determined to prove a villain” (I.i.30). The emphasis on good vs. evil and wrong vs. right was of the utmost significance to audiences because it taught them moral lessons. These moral lessons were important to Elizabethans because religion was an overarching aspect of their cultural context. Shakespeare combined the idea of Richard being deformed together with these values to emphasise the insidious nature of his personality and in effect, contrast him against the heroic Richmond.…

    • 1399 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Henry VIII was the second king of the Tudor line, which seized power after a politically volatile period in English history, the Wars of Roses. His line had only tangential claims through a female line of murky legitimacy and a male line from a former queen consort. At this time, there were still people with better claims to the throne than Henry, such as the noble Pole family, so Henry VIII had probable need to test his subjects’ loyalty to him and augment his own stability should his nobles not like his changes. This is particularly clear in his treatment of dissenters such as Sir Thomas More and Reginald Pole, who he had beheaded for treason, which in addition to asserting his power, weeded out those powerful figures who could oppose him. Additionally, his new stewardship of his nation’s Church allowed Henry to achieve a state of divinity, thereby cementing the Tudor line and all Protestant monarchs from it as the true leaders, ordained by God, making it harder for religious peasants and noblemen to rebel against them for fear of invoking God’s wrath.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The pursuit of glory and honour outweighed the security of England in deciding Henrician foreign policy. Although Henry’s foreign policy in this period was greatly influenced by his desire for security, both personal and national, there is much historiographical debate as to whether it was the primary motive of his actions abroad. In this essay glory and honour will be dealt with together, although glory tends to be associated with wartime victory, whereas honour is related to the upholding of status and in particular the dignity of Henry VIII - together both of these contribute to the overall prestigious nature of a monarch and are associated heavily with one another in a late Medieval context. Whilst security was consistent with the desires…

    • 1339 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hotspur's Views On Honor

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Honor is commonly associated with people in places of high worthiness and respect, in Henry IV – Part 1 we aren’t given a set definition of what they view honor to be. Instead, honor has different meanings to different characters in the play. Shakespeare portrays his views on honor through the characters of Hotspur, Falstaff, and Hal. Since these characters have such contrasting views on honor it creates conflict for them with other individuals because they aren’t able to see eye to eye on their opposing actions.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Like many writers, Shakespeare’s purpose of writing was driven by the context and audiences of his times. Based on the political situation of Queen Elizabeth I, who had progressively enlarged her power at the expense of the…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    Shakespeare’s works are not limited to expressing the concerns and interests of a narrowly confined historical period. They have in them the…

    • 3051 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    2.03B AP English

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages

    4. What is Henry implying when he says that he is loyal to "the majesty of heaven...above all earthly kings"? What tone (manner in which an author expresses his attitude) does this statement hold? He is clarifying that he is loyal to God above anyone else. I believe the tone is a humble yet respectful one, though some may think otherwise.…

    • 1204 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics