First Past the Post is the voting system used in General elections in the UK. It has many advantages, like the fact that it provides a clear view of the parties that can be voted for, such as Liberal Democrats, Labour, and Conservative, among others. It usually allows Single party governments, and rarely ends up in hung, or coalition governments, such as the likes that we are in at the moment. It also prevents extremist parties such as BNP from having a large say in government, as a party much have at least 5% of votes to do this. It also allows voters to choose between people rather than just the parties, and it gives a chance for popular independent candidates to be elected. Last but not least, it is also by far the simplest voting system around, which is mainly why it is so popular- it only requires one vote for the party of your choice, one tick and it is done.
However, there are also many disadvantages to this system, being that It excludes smaller parties from ‘fair’ representation, as the votes do not always represent that amount of seats taken up by a particular party. It excludes the minorities from gaining a fair representation, which does not conclude with the idea of having a representative democracy.. It leaves a large number of wasted votes which do not go towards the election of any candidate, if this candidate does not gain the most votes. It can also cause vote-splitting, if the voter is not sure of which party to vote for. Many voters are disturbed byu the idea that their votes are useless if their party does not gain the most votes and win, and this deters them from voting at all, at times. Finally, FPTP systems are dependent on the drawing of electoral boundaries. If there are more supporters of a particular party in different boundaries, then other parties are left with little options that to try and change the opinions of the people with their policies and actions.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…
- 974 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Every four years, the Electoral College enjoys a fleeting moment of fame. But the impact of the college on presidential elections is far greater and more controversial than its brief life indicates.…
- 687 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…
- 282 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…
- 651 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Growing up as kids we were taught the design of our democracy and the constitutional principles. According to the Webster Dictionary a democracy is “ government in which people choose their leaders by voting, and where they are treated equally and have equal rights.” The definition does not capture what the United States feels it's a democracy. The United States is believe in the democratic ideology is, but is best known as a representative republic. In The Columbia Encyclopedia, Sixth Edition, 2001: "Traditionally a republic is distinguished from a true democracy in that the republic operates through a representative assembly chosen by the citizenry, while in a democracy the populace participates directly in governmental affairs. In actual practice,…
- 441 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
I will state my position towards the electoral college along with the pros and cons leading to my choice. I will explain why the people should want to keep it along with why some don’t want to trust it. I will also explain what will happen if it goes away because we know what it does.…
- 641 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Critics argue that this system listens to the minority. In fact, it does not, this system discourages minority by using the winner take all rule. The winner take all rule promotes the idea that 49.9% of voters might get no representation. The Electoral should be changed to a proportional representation system, a method of voting by which political parties are given legislative representation in proportion to their popular vote. For example, in a state with 21 electors and 47% votes for Republicans and 53% for Democrats should get electors proportional to the popular vote, which would be 11 electors for Democrats and 9 for Republicans. This system would be much fair and would help represent both the minority and the majority of a certain state. Proportional elector system will not only encourage voter turnout, but also help accurately reflect the views of the public. Another reason why the Electoral College should be changed is because there is a theoretical possibility that a president loses the popular vote but still wins the electoral votes. As history shows, in the election of 1888 between Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison won the election with plurality of the Electoral Vote (Harrison - 233 Electoral votes, Cleveland – 168 Electoral Votes),…
- 1448 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…
- 1099 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Instead of major parties or candidates that always have the advantage of winning, minor parties or candidates will have a chance at receiving more votes due to the increased population of voting. Notably, states that are overwhelmingly democratic or republican like California or Texas respectively can have a chance to become swing states free of party support. Simply, the more people vote the more likelihood there is of having closer election results because of all the different views that people possess. Honestly, local and national elections only have a limited number of party groups that win because of all the party political groups that are coherent to that location. All the influence and funding that is put into these groups has tarnished the integrity of the election and has effected the location around them. With the use of mandatory voting, the number of people with nonpartisan opinions will overweigh the votes of political clubs causing fair game. It is sensible to have local communities or states to have equal odds in voting because there will be less inaccuracies on political outlooks in these…
- 814 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
One Voting Amendment is that they lowered the voting age down. You now only have to be eighteen years of age, instead of the age prior. This is the 26th amendment, and was created during the cold, brutal Vietnam War. People decided that if someone older than eighteen could go to war, and die bravely for their country, they could also vote the next leader.…
- 247 Words
- 1 Page
Good Essays -
I will state my position towards the electoral college along with the pros and cons leading to my choice. I will explain why the people should want to keep it along with why some don’t want to trust it. I will also explain what will happen if it goes away because we know what it does.…
- 1350 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Op-Ed: Why We Should Keep the Electoral College The electoral college is the current system in which the united state chooses the president and vice president. The electoral college system was created in 1787 by the framers, and hasn't changed over the years. The current problem with the electoral college system is that the loser of the popular vote can still win the presidency by winning the electoral college votes. This has happened 3 times in the last 56 elections.…
- 565 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This system makes it more fair for states that do not feel as important. Citizens are more likely to vote, thus improving the results and chances of a candidate winning. This grants the less populated states to feel as though their votes are just as important as the more populated ones. Also, it is a much more accurate and organized way to count votes. The Electoral College reduces the chance of miscounts and revotes.…
- 612 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
It is important to consider the development of a new system of national elections and the issues that would result. Implementing the direct election would lead to “a host of defects that would make electoral misfires more likely and trigger a series of political and constitutional crises” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). This would be a source of instability moving forward as these changes would require changes to the current system and would need to have the agreements among several states in a subconstitutional or binding form or an amendment to the Constitution ratified by two thirds of the states. The new proposed system “risks creating a presidential election system that is neither workable nor fair” (Williams, 2011, p. 173). While it is argued that the direct election would promote fairness and representation, it would likely be the case that these factors would be reduced in this scenario. It is therefore essential to develop a coherent framework for implementing such a strategy. (Implementing direct…
- 1746 Words
- 7 Pages
Better Essays -
Who 's voting for the president? Not you. We live in a society where your vote…
- 1126 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays