Preview

Disparate Treatment Case Study

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
437 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Disparate Treatment Case Study
As noted in the EEOC tutorial (located in this week’s lecture), candidates for the Director of HR position of the newly merged company. ZAB, are being asked to prepare a presentation about Title VII, as it pertain specifically to disparate impact and disparate treatment policies that should be implemented to avoid liability for potential Title Vii violation. Do research to prepare for your presentation, and write a brief set of answers to the following questions:
The difference between a disparate impact and a disparate treatment claim;
Disparate Treatment: Also known as differential treatment, disparate treatment claims are ones in which the plaintiff alleges he or she is the victim of intentional discrimination on the part of the employer. To be considered a victim of intentional discrimination, the complaining employee must show he or she is treated less favorably because of a
…show more content…

Unlike disparate treatment claims, disparate impact claims do not involve intentional discrimination, i.e., the plaintiff is not required to prove that he or she is the victim of discriminatory motive or discriminatory intent. www.employmentlaw.com The complaint procedure for a disparate impact and a disparate treatment claim as it pertains to the EEOC;
The person needs to contact their local EEOC field office to file their charge of discrimination. The EEOC will contact the employer and investigate. The employee and employer will be given the change to resolve the matter via mediation. If the matter is not resolved via mediation, the EEOC will either dismiss the complaint as being unsubstantiated, the EEOC will sue the employer, or the EEOC will issue a notice of right to sue letter to the employee and the employee will have 90 days to file a private lawsuit.


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The disparate impact theory requires a plaintiff to demonstrate that an apparently neutral employment practice affects one group more harshly than another and that the practice is not justified by business necessity. A prima face case is established when the plaintiff identifies a specific employment practice to be challenged; and through relevant statistical analysis proves that the challenged practice has an adverse impact on a protected group. When it comes to the case, discrimination was seen, but never affects more than one…

    • 1228 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The plaintiff disparate (adverse) impact claim failed because this type of philosophy involves the plaintiff proving that the employment practice was more severely on one set of individuals than another, and the practice is not justified by business necessity. A prima face case is recognized when: (1) the plaintiff perceives a certain employment practice to be tested; and (2) through appropriate statistical investigation and revealing that the test practice has an adverse impact on a certain group. Mr. Dunlap did not present clues that the practices used in his conversation was used for other employment results, and no statistical evidence proof can display that a secure set of people was adversely impacted. There was no confirmation at trial in regards to TVA hiring practices and the only scenarios recognized was the Cumberland committee interrogations and scoring of the applications during the Dunlap’s interviewing process. Furthermore,…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manner Case Summary

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff worked for the Defendant in several positions. The Plaintiff alleges twelve different incidents occurred where she was treated differently than her white co-workers. These includes incidents such as dress code violations that white employees did not receive. Another involved her supervisor advising the Plaintiff not to steal anything. There were other race-based comments such as a supervisor referring to the Plaintiff’s hair as “nappy.”…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    | |discrimination based on race, |of people” put of a particular job was| |origin. The EEOC could file civil |…

    • 1359 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    EEOC Presentation Paper

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Throughout the United States history, there has been a large amount of discrimination in the workplace and no laws to protect employees. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex and national origin. If an employee feels they have been a victim of employment discrimination they can file a charge or claim with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) (Contributors, 2014). EEOC strives to protect employees that are not treated fairly by other employees or companies. After a complaint has been filed with EEOC, they will handle all the claims by following common procedures and follow all rules and regulations to ensure all cases are handled the same.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Employers must understand that the persons who evaluate and decide the outcome of employment discrimination cases (the EEOC investigator, federal or state judge, and/or jury) have keen senses of fairness and expect that employees will be treated in a fair manner. As a result, employers are exposed to substantial liability for any acts, including perceived acts, of discrimination in the workplace. Employers should take any charge of discrimination seriously and the employer must keep in mind that, at a minimum, it needs to have a legitimate, non-discriminatory reason for taking the action in question. In addition, an employer's response will be evaluated by persons who have a different perspective than the employer. What…

    • 964 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment prohibits employers from treating applicants or employees differently because of their membership in a class protected by Title VII. The central issue is whether the employer's actions were motivated by discriminatory intent, which may be proved by either direct or circumstantial evidence. Disparate treatment is considered intentional discrimination and the employer may not say they are discriminating. The U.S. Supreme Court has a list of indicators that leave discrimination as the only explanation when every other explanation is eliminated: (1) The plaintiff must establish a prima facie case of discrimination; (2) the employer must then articulate, through admissible evidence, a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for its actions; and (3) in order to prevail, the plaintiff must prove that the employer's stated reason is a pretext to hide discrimination. (http://www.hr-guide.com/data/G701.htm. This is called direct method - burden-shifting. In disparate treatment cases, the employer's policy is discriminatory on its face (Bennett-Alexander and Hartman, 95). McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green 411 U.S. 792 (1973) is a case that shows disparate…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) may take action when an investigation shows that there has been a violation in a person’s civil rights just because of his or her attributes.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disparate impact is a methodology for establishing that an employer has engaged in discrimination against a specific group of employees or job applicants of the same race, ethnicity, religion or sex that does not require evidence that the employer intended to discriminate. In Smith v. City of Jackson, Mississippi, 125 S. Ct. 1536 (2005), the United States Supreme Court has held that claims under the ADEA may be brought under a disparate impact analysis.…

    • 1721 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disparate treatment requires the plaintiff to show that he/she was treated differently because of sex, race, color, religion, or national origin. Disparate impact applies if the employer has a rule that, is not directly discriminatory, but in practice excludes too many people in a protected group (Beatty et al. 2008). There is a statute of limitations when taking legal action and filing a case of employment discrimination, which begins on the date the alleged discrimination took place. Consulting with a lawyer or contacting the EEOC are vital steps in assuring ones job and rights are…

    • 1623 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Flagrant Violations

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page

    Stephanie your discussion response outlines the activity that an employer would do treating a protected class in disparate treatment treating them differently. Based on this explanation it is evident that the protected classes of people should be protected when employers follow different practices that violate their rights. In light, of these facts many of these protected classes are overlooked by companies and the intent of these violations are never identified. The only way for these types of violations to be identified is for better education to permeate the national workforce. Once this is accomplished the areas of concern, the protected classes will be able to bring suit for flagrant violations. In the article, “Race, Employment, and Crime:…

    • 230 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Disparate Treatment

    • 4057 Words
    • 17 Pages

    The Supreme Court applied Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to law enforcement in 1972. Agencies could be sued for discriminating against qualified women. In some cases, the courts issued consent decrees which forced agencies to hire qualified women. Many law enforcement agencies used height and weight limits to prevent women from meeting the qualifications until the courts struck down this practice in 1977 in Dothard vs.…

    • 4057 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Disparate treatment means unequal behavior toward someone because of a protected characteristic, and it is protected under Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act. A disparate treatment violation occurs when an individual of a protected group is shown to have been singled out and treated less favorably than others in a similar situation on the basis of a characteristic that is protected under Title VII. For a disparate treatment claim to be upheld in court it must be plausible and shows that the employer intentionally discriminated.*** The issue is whether the employer’s actions were motivated by discriminatory intent. Discriminatory intent can be shown either by direct evidence, or through indirect or circumstantial evidence, but it must be…

    • 1072 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Noting the differences will clear up the confusion between the two. Disparity is a natural imbalance or inequality. Discrimination is the result of man-made imbalance or inequality. Many say that disparity comes from discrimination but that’s not always the case. For example many studies have stated that minorities commit more crimes than whites therefore they get punished for it, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the system is discriminating against them. Discrimination on the other hand is when you get punished for the way you look or what you believe in, therefore discriminating against a certain individual can in fact cause a disparity but it may not always be the only reason for the…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “The word discrimination comes from the Latin "discriminare", which means to "distinguish between". To discriminate socially is to make a distinction between people on the basis of class or category without regard to individual merit. Examples of social discrimination include racial, religious, sexual, sexual orientation, disability, ethnic, height-related, and age-related discrimination”. (Wikipedia, 2006) Discrimination is used in every day life. There are many times when a police officer who is white pulls over an African American. Sometimes because of the discrimination, the African American will plead in court that the only reason that he got pulled over was because of his color. In this day and age, many people who go to court claim that it is because of their color. There have been examples of white vs. black, Hispanic vs. black and Muslim vs. white, which goes to court. This student believes that many people use the color card to get out of jail. An example of discrimination being used by law enforcements is the Rodney King Story.…

    • 959 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays