Introduction
Even though every student has the right to an education, the teachers should be able to remove disruptive students permanently because disruptive students can affect the learning of other students and takes time away from the classroom.
Disruptive students tend to take the learning experience away from other students. A. When a student is interfering with the classroom like interrupting the teacher it can stop the students from their minds trying to learn.
From person experience, when another student would interrupt the teacher and make the class wait it would be frustrating. In some cases would have to do extra work on other days because we did not finish in class.
When the teacher has to stop to discipline the student, it stops her from …show more content…
A. The teacher has to stop teaching in order to get the classroom back in order, it takes up time that could be used finishing up the lesson. 1. Constantly needing to stop and start over something is wasting time. Instead of doing a lesson the teacher is trying to get a student to cooperate.
The time the teacher is spending disciplining the disruptive student, the teacher could be helping another student who came to learn. Miller (n.d.), Constant interruptions can interfere with focus. Students are forced to wait while the behavior is addressed, or they are sidetracked by the disruptive student 's attempts to be noticed (para.3).
Every child has the right to an education, there are different methods to working with disruptive students. A. Instead of kicking the student out of the classroom there can be ways to try to communicate with the student. 1. The Lorain (2012) website states that it would be a good idea to let the student know who has authority, it is also good to have time to be able to sit down and maybe talk to the student about why they might be