Preview

Divine Command Theory. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1618 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Divine Command Theory. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right?
There are millions of people who believe in God, but among these people the differences lie in to what extent each believes that God has control over what is right and wrong. Are people's moral standards right because God commands them, or does God command them because they are right? The Divine Command Theory most simply states that God's commands are what is morally right, and what God forbids is morally wrong. This means that loving one another is right because God commands humans to do so. Advocates of the Divine Command Theory believe this, and believe that morality is the same as that which God commands. Things are good because God created them and/or willed them.

Divine Command Theorists believe that there are objective moral standard that are the same for everyone and are independent of individual beliefs. These moral standards are true for everyone regardless of whether or not they believe them or know of them. These ultimate moral standards exist in commands given by God. God commands only things that are good, and he would never command a person to act immorally. God is all-powerful, all knowing, and all loving. God commands these things in order to do what is good for us as humans, and his commands are automatically morally right.

The opponents of the Divine Command Theory do not believe that God has that much control over the earth and what is morally just and unjust. They believe that morality is subjective, and that even if there is a God morality would still be subjective. What does it matter anyway what God commands or thinks since it is just another subjective opinion? One of the only reasons that people obey God's commands is that they fear that they will be punished in someway if they do not. They fear that they will go to hell if they do not obey, or that something bad will happen to them. This would mean that their motives are merely self-interested. But, a Divine Command Theory advocate would argue that God created us, and it is our
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment
    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nt1310 Unit 1 Assignment

    Devine Command Theory is a theory that makes morality dependently solely on the individuals god and god’s word or teaching establishes a moral obligation to the god’s followers. The morality is determined by the character of the god and his command and this morality is the right action to be taken as required. These morality guidelines can vary depending of the specific religion that…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma
    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Analyzing Jane Craig's Euthyphro Dilemma

    By creating an alternative, the atypical Christian answer avoids the dilemma entirely by arguing that divine nature is the moral standard. It is the character of God which determines how God commands us to behave. This is also reinforced in Scripture, where we see the terms “holy” and “godliness” frequently used as synonyms for moral pious or piety. They are one and the same thing. And is further reinforced by Scott Rae, "Morality is not grounded ultimately in God 's commands, but in His character, which then expresses itself in His…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Bibl 104 Final Exam Questions
    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Bibl 104 Final Exam Questions

    God commands a particular action because it is good, only commands what is good for you…

    • 1358 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Explain what is meant in the Bible by the phrase "God is good."
    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Explain what is meant in the Bible by the phrase "God is good."

    The Ten Commandments show us what good is according to God. The Ten Commandments explain to us how we should act and what our religious and social duties should be. God could be said to be showing his love for this through these laws. Another common biblical image of God is that of a judge to whom we all answer to, however, if God is seen as a judge “Psalms 75:7 But God is the Judge; He puts down one and exalts another,” then he must be trying to divide the good from the bad, we could see this as God trying to protect the people who worship him from the sinners, however it is hard to distinguish the bad from the good. The Ten Commandments offer a guide for this, so that we can see what is wrong and what is right, so therefore we could see this as a good act of God as throughout the Bible God demonstrates his desire for justice for his people. People may follow the Ten Commandments because they are scared of the possibility of going to Hell or that they are so full of faith for the Lord that they follow them without thinking, that if it is the wish of God then they must act and follow these rules. The Old Testament displays God as being vengeful and punishing those who sin, whereas in the New he is seen as being forgiving and loving. These are two sides of God which keep people obeying the Ten Commandments, as there are two opinions of him, one that he is punishing and the other that he is forgiving. God also punishes those because he loves all people and love…

    • 1974 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Nietzsche's Moral Framework Of Morality Essay
    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Nietzsche's Moral Framework Of Morality Essay

    Another issue with any divine command morality theory is that we have no confirmation that there even is the essential God, a great deal less which God's commands are the commands of that God. There are many distinctive moral frameworks credited to God. This is so even inside of the umbrella of Christian belief in a higher power; more so when we consider different belief…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory Research Paper
    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page

    Divine Command Theory Research Paper

    The Divine Command Theory leaves no room for reconciliation with the concepts of Christian liberty and God’s undeserving grace. There is no room for failure according to this concept because we will never be able to keep all of God’s commandments. It is difficult, dare I say impossible, to accept this theory if one is a true believer. By rejecting the concept of grace, one rejects the very compassion and reason Jesus died on the cross for us. The apostle Paul states, “For by grace you have been saved through faith, and this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God-not the result of works, so that no one may boast. For we are what he has made us, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand to be our way of life" (Hollinger, 2002, p.100) (Ephesians 2:8, New Living Translation). I will never be able to earn the grace of God, yet it is his “internal working of grace” that allows me to be ethical (Hollinger, 2002, p.100). "If the Son shall make you free, you shall be free for real" and free from the condemnation of the law.…

    • 232 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Euthyphro's Dilemm Unrestricted Divine Command Theory
    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Euthyphro's Dilemm Unrestricted Divine Command Theory

    It can be well argued that the unrestricted divine command theory is aimed to explain what is right and good depending on God’s commands. To understand the unrestricted divine command theory, one must understand the Theory of Right Conduct, which encompasses the nature of what makes an action right or wrong, and the Theory of Value, which helps explain intrinsic goodness and badness in relation to God’s commands. Intrinsic means a thing has its value in itself or “as it is”. It does not represent value like a dollar bill, but is the value. The Theory of Right Conduct states “An action A is obligatory if and only if (and because) God commands that we A” (Timmons 24). An obligatory action is an action one should morally do and is often referred to as required. “An action A is wrong if…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    If God Knows What We Are Going to Do, He Has No Right to Reward the Good and Punish the Wicked. Discuss
    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages

    If God Knows What We Are Going to Do, He Has No Right to Reward the Good and Punish the Wicked. Discuss

    The idea that God gave humans free will is one that is essential to the Christian faith. This is highlighted in Genesis. If we were to believe this concept consequently, we would believe that we are morally responsible for our actions. The idea of omnipotence logically requires God knowing what we will do before we do it. This is a problem with the idea of free will, as this may mean that we do not entirely have freedom. It could be argued that God has no right to reward and punish if he is able to foresee what will happen. In the Bible there are many passages which demonstrate God rewarding and punishing.…

    • 1158 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Euthyphro Dilemma Argument
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Euthyphro Dilemma Argument

    For example, if I were a defender of the Divine Command Theory, I would argue that although God’s commands are arbitrary, God still holds moral authority. To further explain my case, I would acknowledge that if God’s commands are in fact arbitrary and hold no moral authority, that means they must be based on random choice or whim, rather than any reason or system. However, that cannot be the truth when my faith teaches me that God’s commands are necessary to create order in society. If it is to my belief that God is the omnipotent power and makes no mistakes, then I must also believe that God does have a reason for his commands and without them, we would be worse off as a society. Those who are against the Divine Command Theory like to label God’s commands as arbitrary because they are not be able to understand the reasoning behind them, but there does not mean there needs to be a clearly outlined background for a command in order for it to be moral. God would have not created the command in the first place if He thought it would not help to preserve order in society, making it reason enough to prove the Divine Command Theory. By denying the conclusion to the first horn of the DCT, I have resolved the Euthyphro…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Examine the reasons for the view that morality is based upon religion.
    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Examine the reasons for the view that morality is based upon religion.

    Many people believe that morality is based upon religion and based on the rules written in the Bible and other holy books. Although, some say that religion is completely opposed to morality and it is wrong to mix the two. Dostoevsky argued that 'religion provides people with a reason to be moral because if there were no God everything would be permitted.' Meaning that there is no point to morality if God didn't set the moral values in the first place. But we could also say that we only behave morally because we are scared of God: 'responsibility and guilt point to God' which is not the right way to think about doing good. We shouldn't behave well in the hopes of a reward or because we are scared, we should do good things because we want to. The Divine Command Theory tells us that our morals are set by a divine power: God. This means everything that God tells us is moral and that we should not judge this as it is the word of God, and God's word is good.ome sociologists see childhood as socially constructed: in other words, as something created and defined by society. They argue that what people mean by childhood, and the status of children in society, is not fixed but duffers between different times, places and cultures. This can be illustrated by comparing the western idea of childhood with childhood in the past and in other cultures.…

    • 512 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    James Rachels 'God And Morality Are Incomcompatible'
    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    James Rachels 'God And Morality Are Incomcompatible'

    What is morally good is defined in different ways throughout the world. Race, society, moral beliefs, God, an individual, and also many others can determine what is thought to be good or bad. God as well as the individual defines what the good is.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Divine Command Theory
    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Divine Command Theory

    People are extremely motivated by self-interest, even as societies have evolved and grown larger. While the more intertwined societies did lead to a greater need for cooperation in order to live as peacefully as possible, the need to follow the rules of that society can still be ignored when self-interests are present. The need to live by a set of moral rules is well explained by connecting God and morality. As God holds a person accountable, following the moral rules is now is that person’s interest. So even while the person may act according to society, the actions are still explained by the incentives and sanctions placed by God with the promise of Heaven and the threat of Hell, respectively. However, the Divine Command Theory falls short by basing morality solely on God’s commands. Morality then seems subject to God’s whims, which makes morality arbitrary. The opposing view counters strongly with the existence of morals within atheists. For if morals are based only on God’s will, then atheists must be godless brutes lacking any semblance to a moral compass. The morality of atheists is clearly evident, yet the argument failed to establish a reason for morals other acknowledging damage done to the…

    • 1962 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Religious Notions of Evil and Moral Notions of Evil Are Not Mutually Exclusive
    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Religious Notions of Evil and Moral Notions of Evil Are Not Mutually Exclusive

    Morality, in a descriptive sense, refers to the values, norms and code of conducts that determine right or wrong. Wrong doings are considered to be morally wrong. Evil is known to cause harm and can be triggered by anger or irascibility. Religion and morality are closely intertwined and inseparable. Majority of people who believe in God are likely to have respect and concern people than those who do not. Those who have no religious philosophy usually have different moral viewpoints. Morality does not require religion but religion requires morality. Morality can stand alone without the influence of religion and still have good…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Divine Command Theory
    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Divine Command Theory

    The Divine Command Theory states that whatever God says is so, simply because God said so. Meaning X is morally right because God says so and Y is morally wrong because God says so. This theory states that things are wrong or right simply because God says, not because of what we consider to be morally right or wrong, but just because of what God says.…

    • 375 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is Unjustified Morality
    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is Unjustified Morality

    There are two types of morality, justified and unjustified. Justified morality can usually stand on its own. It does not require intense reasoning because it is common sense. For example, “Do not kill” and “Do not steal” are justified moral commands because if you kill or steal, you are bringing evil upon someone else and that is immoral. Unjustified morals are harder to find reason for because they are “unjustifiable” in nature. An example of an unjustifiable moral is “Do not have sexual relations out of wedlock.” For this example, and for many other instances of unjustified morality, it is difficult to explain why doing the act is immoral. It becomes difficult to answer the question “Why shouldn’t I do this in order to remain moral?” Or,…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics