Preview

Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actors In The Global Politics Analysis

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
900 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do States Remain The Most Powerful Actors In The Global Politics Analysis
'To what extent do states remain the most powerful actors in the Global Politics' Discuss. In our interconnected world today, it remains often obscure and arguable who are the most powerful global actors. States are frequently referred to as a politically organised system or entity that consists of a government, society, and people. Due to state sovereignty and state-centric theory, which compromises of a supreme and legitimate authority with the ability to control/influence behaviours of others and the ability to harness coercive military power, they have long remained the most powerful. While states remain incredibly powerful, to determine this we must first look at respective challenging …show more content…
Their goal is to maximise profit, continuously invent, labour to remain cheap and achieve market dominance. Multinational corporations have colossal influence in the international system exerting both economic and political influence. Evidently, multinational corporations gain much of their power from their capacity to operate, coordinate, and manage transactions between states. Accordingly, we must comprehend the effect multinational corporations have on foreign affairs and how they take advantage of changing political situations. Despite of this, multinational corporations subsist because they efficiently allot inadequate material such as coal and oil. Kogut and Kulatilaka recognize this as a functioning double-edged organisation. For example, Zambia, one of the poorest countries in the world, is losing money that could aid the country, due to transfer pricing when the multinational mining company Glencore shifts their profit and dodges taxes. Around three billion dollars is lost because of tax evasion and tax avoidance by multinationals. On the other hand, states are more powerful because they alone possess military power, with the addition of creating and enforcing laws. Proof of this comes from the example of China tightly controlling corporations and their activities, demonstrating that it is still possible for states to be more powerful. Hence, multinational corporations must continue to lobby governments to get their laws through, which ultimately means power lies in the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    International decision making enables superpowers to make key decisions about the world economy, conflicts or environmental issues. This power is mainly held in the hands of inter-governmental organisations (IGO’s) some IGOs involve all nations, such as the U.N., whereas others are more exclusive such as the G8, or regional such as NATO. These IGO’s are important for superpowers to maintain their status as it allows them to focus global policy and decision making in their own interest. For example most IGO’s operate a veto voting system, where if a certain country with veto does not agree to the policy then the vote is not carried out. Many superpowers use this to their advantage, for example the EU and the USA tend to vote with each other, giving them the opportunity to block policies they do not agree with, therefore allowing them to force their own policies. This makes it difficult for smaller nations with less power to have a role in international decision making.…

    • 485 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Multinational corporations are working hard to expand their control over the international economy and to undo vital health, safety and environmental protections won by citizen movements.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Assignment 1

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Smelser, N. and Baltes, P. (2014). Multinational corporations. [online] www.columbia.edu. Available at: https://www0.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty/bkogut/files/Chapter_in_smelser-Baltes_2001.pdf) [Accessed 3 Aug. 2014].…

    • 3095 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    POL114 Essay

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The United States of America is a hegemonic power which has great influence in international politics due to its contributions to history. President Barrack Obama said in his speech at the United States Military Academy at West Point, “…America must always lead on the world stage. If we don’t, no one else will.” When it comes down to which country holds greater influence in the international system, America is known in being a hegemon which has influence in many international institutions. The United States of America took the lead in founding the United Nations and contributes the most money towards the UN’s spending, thus shapes the UN in favour of its interests. This concept of hegemony was analyzed by Gramsci, whom used Machiavelli’s view of power as a centaur, “half man and half beast”, to argue power is a mixture of coercion and consent which are tools for hegemonic states which is what realists agree with1. In this sense, the United States has been using such “tools” to seek national interest. Thus, by examining Obama’s speech through Realist, Liberal and Marxist/critical perspectives, this essay will argue that the perspective of realism best defines America’s position in the global order through its consecutive use of hard power.…

    • 2371 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    President and Congress

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The era of globalization has witnessed the growing influence of a number of unconventional international actors, from non-governmental organizations, to multi-national corporations, to global political movements. Traditional, state-centric definitions of foreign policy as "the policy of a sovereign state in its interaction with other sovereign states is no longer sufficient. Several alternative definitions are more helpful at highlighting aspects of foreign policies.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    states to keep its influence over client states. At the same time, we can assume…

    • 468 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    A key tenet of realist thinking is the concept of power, or more specifically, ‘hard power’ and its uses within the realm of international relations. It is the ability to make other actors comply with a state’s will through the use of force and threat (Copeland 2010). With this key tenet, comes the realist notion of an ongoing balancing of power between states. Some have gone so far as to call it “the central theoretical concept of international relations” (Snyder 1984). This realist sentiment can easily…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    America vs China

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages

    A common approach to power particularly associated with the ranking of states within a hierarchy, has been to identify the capacities that states or other actors use to exert influence. In this view, the key elements of national power include military strength, economic development, population, and geography.…

    • 1244 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the international realm, states will inevitably seek a balance of power. When a number of weaker states are threatened by a coalition of stronger states, they join forces, establish a formal alliance, and seek to persevere their own independence by checking the power of the opposing side. Balance of power seeks to ensure the equilibrium of power in which case no one state is in a position to dominate all the others. The aims of the Balance of Power Theory is to preserve the independence and survival of individual nation-states, preserve the state system, and prevent any one state from dominating the system. The means to achieve this is through vigilance, alliance, reciprocal communication, intervention, and…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To offer an explanation of POWERS, two dimensions: aggregated national power and planetary reach. Aggregated national power takes into consideration geographic position; financial power; industrial output; military might (i.e. ‘power projection’ and/or ability of defense); alliance membership; educational attainment; cultural attraction; population size; historical reputation, militarily, politically and economically; government capacity and efficiency; national cohesion; and potential over the next ten years. Meanwhile, planetary reach is based on five categories:…

    • 7258 Words
    • 30 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    One of the greatest challenges that multinational corporations pose to state sovereignty is the face that some states have had to rely on these very corporations to boost the economy in their respective states. States are often forced to rely on these sorts of businesses in order to bolster their economy and…

    • 335 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Non State Actors

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Non-state actors (NSAs) will contribute to the complex operational environment over the next 10 years as trends emerge which allows them the ability to operate in weak or failed states. The perception of a weak US national defense will trigger shifts of strategic relationships and allow non-state actors the opportunity to challenge the international status quo and use weak or failed states as breeding grounds for their ideology. This complex environment will impact on our strategic direction as DOD designs and implements Joint Force 2025.…

    • 433 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Insomnia

    • 6166 Words
    • 25 Pages

    BEYOND THE BUSH DOCTRINE: AMERICAN HEGEMONY AND WORLD ORDER MARTIN GRIFFITHS The scar does the work of the wound.1 This article elaborates the changing nature of American hegemony in international relations, and assesses the Bush Administration’s determination to change the basis of US hegemony in the context of its proclaimed ‘war on terror’. I argue that the Administration’s grand strategy is self-defeating, threatening the status of the United States as a benign hegemon without enhancing its security. However, on the assumption that the neo-conservative influence over American foreign policy will wane in the coming months and years, the United States can still take advantage of its unprecedented power to promote a more sustainable world order. The paper begins with an examination of American hegemony in international relations. I then discuss the manner in which the terms of that hegemony have been changed by the current Administration under the guise of the war on terror. The third section is a critical analysis of American grand strategy, and the article concludes with an assessment of the conditions under which the United States can sustain its dwindling hegemony in the years to come. United States Hegemony and the Cold War Hegemonia, in the original Greek sense, means ‘leadership’. In international relations, a hegemon is the ‘leader’ or ‘leading state’ of a group of states. The central idea behind hegemonic stability in international relations theory is that the world needs a single dominant state to create and enforce the rules (such as ‘free trade’) among the most important members of the system. To be a hegemon, a state must have the capability to enforce the rules of the system, the will to do so, and a commitment to a system that is perceived as mutually beneficial for the major states. In turn, capability rests upon three attributes; a large, growing economy, dominance in leading technological or…

    • 6166 Words
    • 25 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    State’s role in globalization era is quite different from what it was in traditional times.…

    • 3353 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Modern States

    • 2595 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The modern state is a concept which does not hold a universally accepted definition largely due to the inability of all scholars to agree upon a brief generally acceptable definition, as asserted by Pierson (2004); he raises the notion that even the concept of the state itself remains unresolved as the questions which surround the state cannot be answered with absolute certainty (Pierson, 2004:1). Although, the most famous definition is provided by Max Weber and it defines the state as a “political institutional organisation” whose “administrative staff can successfully exercise a monopoly of legitimate physical force in the execution of its orders” (Anter, 2014:11). However, across the reviewed literature there are a set of common characteristics which are prevalent as the requirements a state needs to meet in order to be considered a modern state. These criterion are much influenced by…

    • 2595 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays