Preview

Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
582 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Do You Think That Americans Problematic Racial History Affected the Decision to Drop the Bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
Elicia Esquivel
January 23, 2013
History
Journal 3
Do you think that Americans problematic racial history affected the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki? I do believe that the racial history had an influence in the decision to drop the bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki; I think this because America had built up tensions and anger. Their way to release these tensions was to drop the bombs and in their minds at that moment they truly believed that it was the correct response and reasonable thing to do. They in my opinion should have restricted the bombing to the opposing soldiers and not killed civilians. The retaliation mentality that they had created the illusion that killing thousands upon thousands of people would equalize what had happened on Pearl Harbor and is a reasonable response. There were fatalities of both parties that should never have happened. The phrase “two wrongs don’t make a right” is true for this situation. Can we really rationalize the murders of all the people in world war two? Everyone’s lives that were lost from both sides didn't have to die. I understand that they had to make an example to create fear in the Japanese but why did they kill innocent civilians. Surely they did not think that every single one of those people were responsible for the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Creating the fear in them was essential to prevent any further bombings such as Pearl Harbor, but it also in my opinion wasn't enough to kill all of those people. When it comes down to everything I believe that it wasn't acceptable to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the American people were so caught up in the racist hatred that erupted after the bombing of Pearl Harbor. The Japanese people were all stereotyped into being these horrible people that had to be taught a lesson. I believe that the reason for bombing Hiroshima was because Americas military wanted to try out their weapons and since they already had the support due to the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Japanese just did not surrender. However, it was the Japanese military leaders that did not want to surrender which led to the bombing on Hiroshima. The president asked the Japanese the first time to surrender by August 3rd and they did not and because of this being a war there is no sympathy. I believe that because of them not surrendering there is no other option. This war consisted of many people dying and there is no option but to surrender or get attacked. Japan if had the opportunity to attack, they would attack and this is true because of the constant resistance they have within the war.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To this day, many debate the primary reasoning behind Truman's decision to use Atomic Bombs against Japan and whether they served to bring a quick end to the war or to gain leverage with the Soviet Union in the post-war world. The cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was specifically decided as these were population dense cities that were primarily devoted to military production. These cities also did not hold cultural significance within Japan, as opposed to cities like Kyoto. Because of this, many argue that Truman did not seek to destroy Japanese culture or its people; the goal was to destroy Japanese means of war production. The war was coming to its end and it was only a matter of time before the Japanese surrendered.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    U.S World History 05.06

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The reason that the bomb was dropped on Japan was because President Truman thought it was the best to get Japan to surrender. Japan was have given two different chances to surrender. But they just ignored them and went on with what they were doing. So bombing both Hiroshima and Nagasaki finally got them to surrender. Another reason was because it saved the American lives and to sped up the end of the war. With Japan surrendering, it saved 100,000 American Soldiers lives and 1,000,000 Japanese lives.…

    • 401 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Analysis

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages

    They clearly wouldn’t have wished this horrific act upon themselves so why wish it upon someone else? Almost 70,000 civilians were killed instantly from the blast and thousands more were killed by crumbling buildings. The weeks following the disaster, many more innocent lives were lost due to radiation poisoning. The few that managed to live suffered severe burns, injuries, and mutations from the radiation exposure. In Doc L, Colonel Tibbets reveals that he thought he was doing more good than bad when he says “I have been convinced that we saved more lives than we took,” and in Doc I, President Truman states “We have used it against those who attacked without warning at Pearl Harbor…” In reality, the casualties from Hiroshima alone outnumbered those of Pearl Harbor considerably. They fought fire with fire to solve the problem, but it just created even more destruction that could have been…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Even though the bomb killed many inocent civilians were killed, I believe that it was necessary because with out the dropping the war would have gone on, and more lives would have been taken on both sides. The Japanese had no means to stop in the war but the dropping of the bomb showed that the US had no means to stand down either and we would take the actions necessary to protect ourselves and make sure that the Germans and Japanese made no advances. I believe it was…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States felt it was important to drop the nuclear bombs on these two urban areas or it would endure more losses. Not exclusively could the lives of numerous fighters have been taken, yet potentially the lives of numerous pure Americans. The United States will dependably attempt to stay away from the loss of American regular folks no matter what, regardless of whether that implies taking existences of different nations innocent people. These occasions not just realized the surrender of Japan and a conclusion to World War II, however they additionally helped shape the idea of universal legislative issues for the following six decades.…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Japan's empire had shattered, and Nazi Germany had just surrendered. President Truman had decided to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There' been a debate ever since on whether or not his decision was reasonable. Japan was ready to surrender and on the verge of collapsing. One could argue that the bombing was barbaric and unnecessary.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though many innocent lives were lost, the atomic bomb was justifiable to use in this case. More lives could have been lost if the U.S. would have invaded Japan. More specifically, the bomb saved Japanese lives. From the battle of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, we saw how extreme they were. If we were to take the mainland, we could have wiped out the entire nation, which is surplus compared to the lives lost from the bomb.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The actions of the U.S federal government are shameful. No one can justify their actions either. Consequently, no one should even try to justify these actions taken by the federal government. The U.S. has no proof that any of the victims were spies for the Japanese people or that any Japanese-Americans had anything to do with the bombing of Pearl Harbor. Basically, it’s unjust to punish over 120,000 people for the actions of others.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the Japanese did bomb the U.S first but didn’t more than half of the America people tell them they weren’t right for doing it on pearl harbor ? So if their wrong, what makes it okay for the United States? The United states was mad because Japan came to their land and killed their innocent people and destroyed everything that they worked so hard to form, but now it’s suddenly not okay for Japan to be just as upset? It’s not even about who wanted the war to end and who was going to do what! Was killing thousands of innocent women, and children, really worth the satisfaction of being able to say you “won” ? okay sure Japan did awful things, but America lowered themselves to a incredibly low level with this evil action. And were in no way right for their actions at all.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone around the world will have their own opinion about the bombing on Hiroshima especially between the American’s and Japanese. I believe someone’s opinion makes an importance based off the generation he or she is from because American’s might’ve agreed to the bombing when it occurred because it was their generation when Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese so it was a form of deadlier retaliation because their people such as loved ones were victims. Therefore, they didn’t want their deaths to be in vein. Moreover, parents wouldn’t have to send their children off to war because the US made it end with the deadly weapon to cause a surrender. Just as much as our present generation would bomb ISIS they don’t because we would know the aftermath a lot of innocent people will die, get injured and lose their homes.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although Japan had an estimated army of 5,000,000 men, they were on the verge of imminent collapse and the two atomic bombs that were dropped on them were not necessary to obtain Japan’s surrender. America’s primary reason for using the atomic bombs on Japan was to intimidate the Soviet Union so that the Soviet Union would stay out of the war with Japan and to demonstrate our world dominance, rather than dropping the bombs solely to induce Japan’s unconditional surrender.…

    • 473 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays