Preview

Why Didn T The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Unjustified?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
566 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Didn T The United States Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Unjustified?
Japan's empire had shattered, and Nazi Germany had just surrendered. President Truman had decided to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. There' been a debate ever since on whether or not his decision was reasonable. Japan was ready to surrender and on the verge of collapsing. One could argue that the bombing was barbaric and unnecessary. President Along those lines, Truman's decision to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki was unjustified.
Japan had considered surrendering before the two atomic bombs were dropped. According to "United States history: Reconstruction to the Present,’’ the following 3 days after Little Boy was dropped in Hiroshima, Japanese leaders debated on whether or not they should have kept fighting. " The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender (Leahy).’’ On top of that, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy, claimed that the Japanese government was looking for a reason to surrender. The Soviet Union declared
…show more content…
The U.S military's alternative plan would have ended up with more than 5 million Japanese casualties (Stimson). "We had adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarian dark ages (Leahy).'' The Admiral goes on to explain that a war can't be won by killing women and children. This shows that the U.S forgot that they were fighting the Japanese government and not the civilians. "We seemed suddenly to have possession of a merciful abridgment of the slaughter in the East and of a far happier prospect in Europe (Churchill).'' Winston Churchill was explaining how America had stooped to massive slaughter when it comes to dealing with the Eastern countries. As a "Humanitarian Nation," the United States should have given Japan two to three days before dropping the atomic bombs (Bard). The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was basically premeditated mass murder. The atomic bombings were unjustified and dropped in a heinous

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    World War II was a global war from 1939 to 1945. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, which brought the total victory of the Allies. Right before Japan’s surrender, the United States dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima and another one on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs caused great damage to Japan and killed estimated 129000 to 246000 people. However, the bombings helped to bring the war to an end. Whether President Truman should make the decision to drop the bombs is still a topic to debate. Due to the fact that it was the best decision Truman could make, the bombs ended the war, and reduced the loss at that time, President Truman was justified in his decision to drop the bombs on japan.…

    • 753 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    President Harry Truman is justified for sending atomic bombs from the United States to Japan civilian cities. Two parts of Japan in particular named Hiroshima and Nagasaki were targeted to kill off the civilians. The bombs were supposed to target a certain range of people, the hiroshima ranged from 90,000 to 146,000 and the Nagasaki ranged from 39,000 to 80,000 deaths. These bombs initiated the action of surrender from Japan and this happened on August 15, 1945. There are documents that prove Harry Truman should be justified for the participation in winning the war for the United States.…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    President Truman decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Japanese just did not surrender. However, it was the Japanese military leaders that did not want to surrender which led to the bombing on Hiroshima. The president asked the Japanese the first time to surrender by August 3rd and they did not and because of this being a war there is no sympathy. I believe that because of them not surrendering there is no other option. This war consisted of many people dying and there is no option but to surrender or get attacked. Japan if had the opportunity to attack, they would attack and this is true because of the constant resistance they have within the war.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    To this day, many debate the primary reasoning behind Truman's decision to use Atomic Bombs against Japan and whether they served to bring a quick end to the war or to gain leverage with the Soviet Union in the post-war world. The cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki was specifically decided as these were population dense cities that were primarily devoted to military production. These cities also did not hold cultural significance within Japan, as opposed to cities like Kyoto. Because of this, many argue that Truman did not seek to destroy Japanese culture or its people; the goal was to destroy Japanese means of war production. The war was coming to its end and it was only a matter of time before the Japanese surrendered.…

    • 202 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb was a good decision. If he had not decided to drop the atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the war would have continued and more Americans, as well as Japanese, would have continued to die. Since the Japanese were using ruthless methods of war like kamikazes or killing themselves rather than be captured, it was hard to tell how far Japan was willing to go in order to win the war. Thus, Truman’s decision to bomb Japan is justifiable by the cause of not knowing to what extents Japan was willing to go. I believe Truman wanted to show the Japanese that the United States was willing to do anything to win the…

    • 125 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another reason that Truman would be justified for his decision to drop the Atomic Bomb would be the type of enemy he was up against. The Japanese were some of the most notoriously stubborn…

    • 498 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    “On the morning of August 6, 1945, the American B-29 Enola Gay dropped an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. Three days later another B-29, Bock’s Car, released one over Nagasaki. Both caused enormous casualties and physical destruction.” (Maddox 1). These disastrous events have weighted upon the American conscience ever since that day in history. Even though there are some people that disagree with the dropping of the atomic bomb, President Truman’s decision was very critical because he prevented the loss of many American lives, Japanese soldiers fought with no notion of ever surrendering, and it brought an end to a bloody war.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The bombings on Japan are the most controversial topics anyone can talk about when it comes to any president's decisions. On August 6th, 1945 an atomic bomb was dropped on Japanese military base Hiroshima as a way to force Japan's surrender, have revenge on them for the bombings of Pearl Harbour, and show the United States dominance against the world. In some cases, he has said that he was motivated just by revenge. This was the first atomic bomb ever used in global warfare. Not already devastated, Japan received more destruction when 3 days later, another bomb was dropped on Nagasaki which was the final stage of World War 2. It was Harry Truman’s decision, with consent of the United Kingdom, to do this to Japan. Truman on the bombings said,“dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was…

    • 584 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It was an "ultimatum" to force the Japanese government to surrender or else the Allies of the United States and United Nations would attack Japan from all sides. On July 29, 1945, their leader Premier Suzuki scorned the ultimatum and actually told his people to increase the Japanese aircraft production. He felt he could still win the war against the United States by increasing his air strikes. After reflection, President Truman took into account that Premier Suzuki would not surrender freely. In fact, the 3,500 Kamikaze airplane raids from Japanese suicide bombers were proof that they were going to fight to the…

    • 995 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    America suggests that using the atomic bomb was the best solution they had in order to prevent the death of more Japanese and American soldiers. They say that if they hadn’t used it then there would be a land invasion and a lot more people would die because Japanese soldiers are people who will do anything to win for the sake of their emperor and honor. However, if only their intention was really to decrease the number of the people who were going to be murdered, bring peace to the world and end the war than they wouldn’t drop the bomb on two big cities where a lot of people live. They would make a demonstration and drop it somewhere where there is not a sign of life. This way, the Japanese would be scared of another bomb and surrender and this kind of a massacre wouldn’t happen. Yet America knew that in case of a land invasion their chances of winning was not that high because of the dedication of the Japanese soldiers.…

    • 1027 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The roughly equal civilian and military parties were locked in a struggle over surrender. The only way in which surrender could be achieved is if a consensus could be achieved amongst the parties. The military leaders refused to back down, unwilling to accept defeat and dishonor. The massive toll that American bombing attacks were taking on Japan had no effect on the military leaders who ready to fight to the end. Had this deadlock remained the Japanese would have fought until they all starved to death because of a blockade or until they had been bombed into oblivion. Only when the atomic bombs were dropped did the deadlock end. The practically immediate call for peace showed the amount of political power that the bombs held. Without a doubt it was the atomic bomb that caused Japan to surrender. It was a forceful enough message to prod the normally withdrawn emperor into action for…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The United States’ decision to bomb two cities of Japan, which we’re Nagasaki and Hiroshima, was not at all justified. Many people know that Japan deliberately attacked Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941, in order to strategically weaken the American Naval Base. However, the United States’ decision to drop the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was to push Japan to surrender the war . The bombing was unjustified because the U.S. military: targeted heavily populated civilian cities, deliberately planned their attack to kill, did not give Japan enough time to respond to the first bombing, (4) did not experience as many casualties than Japan.…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The USA, led by president Harry S. Truman, with the Enola Gay, dropped two atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki on the 6ht and 9th of august 945. This was after the attack on pearl habour, December 7th 1941. Evidently, this has opened many debates arguing whether the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was justified.…

    • 294 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays