Preview

Was the Us Justified in Dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay Example

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1027 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Was the Us Justified in Dropping Atomic Bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki Essay Example
Conventional wisdom has it that America was justifiable after all by dropping a lethal bomb on a city full of civilians and soldiers, because their aim was to end the war. However, America was not reasonable by underestimating the human values, not warning them with the presence of an atomic bomb and leaving ever-lasting effects on a city. The atomic bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki killed 100,000 people. The atomic bomb is described as “the most dangerous threat the world has ever seen” (allvoices, 2011). It literally opened a new era in warfare. Dropping such a bomb can not have any good intentions in it, even though it actually made the war end.

America suggests that using the atomic bomb was the best solution they had in order to prevent the death of more Japanese and American soldiers. They say that if they hadn’t used it then there would be a land invasion and a lot more people would die because Japanese soldiers are people who will do anything to win for the sake of their emperor and honor. However, if only their intention was really to decrease the number of the people who were going to be murdered, bring peace to the world and end the war than they wouldn’t drop the bomb on two big cities where a lot of people live. They would make a demonstration and drop it somewhere where there is not a sign of life. This way, the Japanese would be scared of another bomb and surrender and this kind of a massacre wouldn’t happen. Yet America knew that in case of a land invasion their chances of winning was not that high because of the dedication of the Japanese soldiers.

The number of people who were viciously murdered in a blink of an eye by the atomic bomb cannot be condoned. If the reason why America had used the bomb was to end the war then they would think about the innocent civilians they would be killing too. The fact that they were trained doesn’t affect their innocence; they are still considered as innocent civilians because they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    In this essay I will discuss the reasons for and against whether America was right to drop the two atomic bombs. These two bombs were unloaded on Hiroshima, 6th August 1945, and attempted to hit Nagasaki, 9th August 1945. America gave the two bombs code names, the one that was dropped on Hiroshima was called ‘Little Boy’. This bomb was made of uranium. The final death toll added up to 135,000. The nuclear bomb that fell on Nagasaki was called ‘Fat Man’. This bomb was made of plutonium. The final death toll was about 70,000. This was because the bomb had missed its allocated target and instead fell into a valley.…

    • 955 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The decision to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August of 1945 was made by a complex group of technological, political and military influences. History has it that the bombs were dropped in order to save American lives by avoiding the invasion of Japanese homelands, at least, that was what President Truman told the American public at the time. “For years, this simple view has been challenged by a seemingly more sophisticated academic perspective that the bombs were wrongfully used against innocent civilians, did not genuinely factor into the surrender of Japan, and would have better served the war effort as part of a diplomatic “carrot and stick” package.” (Beason 1). Some argue that the first bomb may have been required to achieve Japanese surrender, but the second one was a needless act of barbarism. According to Admiral William D. Leahy, the President’s Chief of Staff, “The use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war over Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender…” (Beason 1). However, I have many facts to counteract all of these criticisms and to support President Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb.…

    • 1290 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    This war did not seem like there would ever be an end until the US decided to unleash their new weapon of mass destruction, the atomic bomb. I feel that the bomb was unnecessary and unjustifiable for a variety of reasons. One reason was the amount of innocent citizens killed or injured due to the bomb. The bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki which were two highly populated areas at the time.…

    • 677 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The act of dropping these bombs can be considered a great act against humanity, and rightfully so. Any act of war that will slaughter hundreds of thousands of people should be considered a crime against humanity. However, if we had not dropped the bomb on Japan, how many Americans would have been killed attempting to invade the Japanese mainland? Some estimates are as high as half a million, some lower but almost all of the estimates are well over one hundred thousand American lives that would have been lost. This number did not include the number of Japanese that would…

    • 944 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In WW2, the bomb wasn't the smartest thing America did. As they hurt many innocent Japanese people in the process. If President Harry Truman and the military thought out there plan to end the war. They could've ended it much more peacefully. If America were really wanted to drop the bomb, they should've dropped it on Germany, as they were the next threat during the…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Was the atomic bomb truly as diabolical despite putting an end to WWII and saved much more millions in the process? After defeating two out of the three main Axis powers (Italy and Germany), Japan, the remaining main Axis power, still had no intentions of surrendering. The United States was forced to be in the position in which they drop the atomic bomb on Japan and sacrifice Japanese lives for their own or reconsider forming another plan to bring Japan to mercy. Ultimately, the U.S. was in favor with the atomic bomb so they dropped two in total, one each in two major cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki. This had successfully brought Japan to their unconditional surrender and to the end of World War II.…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Even though many innocent lives were lost, the atomic bomb was justifiable to use in this case. More lives could have been lost if the U.S. would have invaded Japan. More specifically, the bomb saved Japanese lives. From the battle of Iwo Jima and Okinawa, we saw how extreme they were. If we were to take the mainland, we could have wiped out the entire nation, which is surplus compared to the lives lost from the bomb.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The large death toll and the civilians who were targeted are crimes against humanity. The Nippon Times in Tokyo pointed out, “What meaning is there in any international law… in any concept of right or wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do” (Document 4). By using the atomic bomb, the U.S threw away the morales it seemed to hold for itself. America is often known for helping other nations when needed, but annihilating hundred of thousands of people completely of a helping hand. Although this was during a time of war and Japan was the enemy, this is beyond acceptable actions of war because of both long and short term implications and death.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Everyone around the world will have their own opinion about the bombing on Hiroshima especially between the American’s and Japanese. I believe someone’s opinion makes an importance based off the generation he or she is from because American’s might’ve agreed to the bombing when it occurred because it was their generation when Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese so it was a form of deadlier retaliation because their people such as loved ones were victims. Therefore, they didn’t want their deaths to be in vein. Moreover, parents wouldn’t have to send their children off to war because the US made it end with the deadly weapon to cause a surrender. Just as much as our present generation would bomb ISIS they don’t because we would know the aftermath a lot of innocent people will die, get injured and lose their homes.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, in 1941, the United States reactions was justified for violent reaction, because of the attack by the Japanese. However, the people from Japan, may claim valid reason to attack, because of "Right Intention," but the United States action of dropping two separate nuclear weapons on two different cities, was an unjust war and extremely evil (Mattison). So, USA was justified in defending their island, but became unjust after the first nuclear attack, because it became responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and men. Destroying Hospitals, Churches, and Historical sites, which is illegal under international law or the Geneva Code of Conventions, but this happened before the United…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “We are in possession of the most destructive explosive ever devised by man” stated Leaflet B dropped on August 6th, 1945. Since the United States knew how destructive the bomb was, they should have not used it in the first place. Not only was japan in danger but Leo Szilard and 69 co-signers at the Manhattan Project stated “ the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of sudden annihilation.” Most people working on the project for two and a half years did not even know what they were working on or hiding from the American public. Though, Japan killed and injured many Americans, the U.S. killed more people and left Japan with high levels of radiation for many years after the bomb was dropped. In conclusion, the United States was not in any way justified for the decision of dropping the atomic…

    • 717 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Some people believe the bombing of Hiroshima was unnecessary. They claim that Japan was on the edge of surrendering, therefore the United States had no right to bomb the Japanese. Many feel that the bombing was unjust due to the amount of civilians that were either killed or injured. One year after the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, the death toll stood at 70,000 from those that died instantly and as a result of the radiation (Takaki 47). Also, 30,524 people were considered severely injured and 48,606 people were considered slightly injured…

    • 1933 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays