Preview

Pearl Harbor Argumentative Essay

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
143 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pearl Harbor Argumentative Essay
So, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, in 1941, the United States reactions was justified for violent reaction, because of the attack by the Japanese. However, the people from Japan, may claim valid reason to attack, because of "Right Intention," but the United States action of dropping two separate nuclear weapons on two different cities, was an unjust war and extremely evil (Mattison). So, USA was justified in defending their island, but became unjust after the first nuclear attack, because it became responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and men. Destroying Hospitals, Churches, and Historical sites, which is illegal under international law or the Geneva Code of Conventions, but this happened before the United

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Burtness discusses the different communication errors that happened during and after the Pearl Harbor event that involved multiple commanders. I am using this piece to show how bad communication could have been apart of the attack on Pearl Harbor.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Attack on Pearl Harbor, inflammatory language is used as a persuasive technique to try and get the citizens of the United States angered and mournful about the bombing of pearl harbor. The point of writing this speech is to persuade Americans to support the war, and that there was a good reason to go to war. Also, he wanted to convince congress to declare war, which minutes later they did. He uses hate filled inflammatory language to appeal to the audience’s emotion, calling it an “unprovoked and dastardly” (Roosevelt 2) attack. By saying this, Roosevelt hopes to make it appear that the bad guys are the Japanese, which they are. He wishes to arouse the American citizens and get them to support his reasons to go to…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The attack on Pearl Harbor and the attack on 9/11 share similarities and differences. 75 years ago on December 7th, 1941, a surprise attack by the Japanese hit Pearl Harbor in Hawaii(Rosenburg 1). 50 years later, on September 11th 2001, an attack by Al-Qaeda hit New York City(Jensen 1). These two acts were very similar in their effect on the country, their number of casualties and warning signs, but had different perpetrators and rescue efforts.…

    • 380 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pearl Harbor took place on December 7th, 1941. Japan had surprised the United States when they attacked one of our military bases in Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. They had attacked the US without warning. The Japanese had destroyed 21 American ships and almost 350 aircraft. They had attacked Pearl Harbor around 7:55 on a Sunday. The Japanese Commander yelled out “tora, tora, tora!” (“tiger, tiger, tiger!”) Which means they caught the Americans by surprise.…

    • 553 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    America was justified for dropping the bomb on Japan during World War Two because they didn't want to lose any more American lives. These American lives are major values to their loved ones.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt asked “that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” to the nation. Declaring a state of war with Japan and convincing the people to support the war effort. The Pearl Harbor address to the Nation delivered by Franklin D. Roosevelt is one of the most famous speeches in American history. Roosevelt uses many rhetorical strategies to convince his audiences and relay his intent to the people and Congress. I will address his audiences, rhetorical strategies, and my opinion on the persuasiveness of his speech.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt changes tones throughout his Pearl Harbor speech to reassure and inform his audience. In his speech FDR creates the tones of informative and reassurance by using repetition. Roosevelt only uses these two different tones and shifts his tone in the middle of the speech. He begins the speech informing the people what has happened and then then ends by reasurring the American people everything will be ok. The change in tone helps make the article sound less depressing and more reassuring.…

    • 597 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I think that the bombing by the United States was justified because the bomb saved lives and the Japanese cheap shot the U.S. at Pearl Harbor. For starters, the bomb saved lives. The bomb dropped by the Americans on the Japanese, saved many more American and Japanese lives. The Japanese said that they would never quit, as it was the dishonorable thing to do. If the Americans were to have tried to capture Japan, the Japanese citizens were prepared to commit seppoku. If the Americans were to have tried by force, many Americans would be wounded in the attempt. Next, the Americans were not in the wrong for bombing the Japanese because the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor when the Americans were not in the war. This justified the Americans act because…

    • 176 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The large death toll and the civilians who were targeted are crimes against humanity. The Nippon Times in Tokyo pointed out, “What meaning is there in any international law… in any concept of right or wrong, if the very foundations of morality are to be overthrown as the use of this instrument of total destruction threatens to do” (Document 4). By using the atomic bomb, the U.S threw away the morales it seemed to hold for itself. America is often known for helping other nations when needed, but annihilating hundred of thousands of people completely of a helping hand. Although this was during a time of war and Japan was the enemy, this is beyond acceptable actions of war because of both long and short term implications and death.…

    • 701 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yes, the Japanese did bomb the U.S first but didn’t more than half of the America people tell them they weren’t right for doing it on pearl harbor ? So if their wrong, what makes it okay for the United States? The United states was mad because Japan came to their land and killed their innocent people and destroyed everything that they worked so hard to form, but now it’s suddenly not okay for Japan to be just as upset? It’s not even about who wanted the war to end and who was going to do what! Was killing thousands of innocent women, and children, really worth the satisfaction of being able to say you “won” ? okay sure Japan did awful things, but America lowered themselves to a incredibly low level with this evil action. And were in no way right for their actions at all.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While on one of the US carriers, the Japanese attacked used with torpedoes. I have always thought I was prepared to be be injured or even killed in battle, but today I was actually scared out of my mind. One moment I, sitting on the carrier deck looking at the ocean and the next the sirens are going off and we are under attack. The only thing I could think about was my wife and son. I just wanted to make it out alive, to be with my wife and son. In the process of the attack I was hit by a piece of the decking, it cut pretty deep into my upper thigh. The doctor says that I am lucky to be alive and I should be able to walk again in due time. As for me, my military career is now over, and I plan on taking up politics, like my dad.…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Pearl Final Essay

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The idea that great wealth can bring great unhappiness is evident in John Steinbeck’s novella, The Pearl. The author uses a several characters and scenes in The Pearl to support this theme.…

    • 422 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    We have come a long way since we decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in World War II. It is amazing that we continue debating on this subject today. The US should not have decided to drop these atomic bombs. This decision was totally unnecessary. Thousands of people died who did not need to die, and many more became sick from radiation poisoning. The bombs wiped two entire cities off the map. How can anyone even argue for this in the first place? One argument that was used to support dropping the bomb was that the Japanese forfeited their rights when they aggressively attacked Pearl Harbor and committed war crimes against prisoners and the Chinese. This argument does not work for a few reasons. First, there are two types of justice in war. There is the justice for going to war and the justice for how you fight in war. The two are separate. This argument assumes that because the US had a reason to go to war, how they fought the war was automatically justified. This is false. It is possible to fight a just war unjustly. Its between ends and means. Reasonable ends do not justify unreasonable means. Also, violations of the rules of war do not justify similar actions in response. Just because the Japanese fought unfair does not mean that we were allowed too. Saying, “Well, you did it, too!” cannot be the basis for War II was bad, we should not have just forfeited our standards and done bad things as well. Our leaders were operating under the “War is hell” doctrine, which means anything that brings the end of war more quickly is good. This is not a way to actually fight wars. If war is hell, then why do we even have rules of war? Hiding behind “War is hell” is a cop out used to try to escape any responsibility for fighting properly. As long as war is here, we should have rules for it to try to lower its impact. Such rules cause mass killings, for example, the dropping of the…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    My eyes roamed across the room, scanning the faces of nearly one hundred of the world’s leading scientists as we all waited in anticipation. We listened to the tiny wooden box that was shaping the world. The Enola Gay prepared to drop the bomb that president Truman hoped would end the war. We listened as the plane approached the target site. A city of over 100,000 people. They would hear the bombers approaching and prepare for an attack -- hiding under desks or crouching in basements as they had been taught -- but there was no hiding from this one. As our lead scientist said when we tested the bomb, "Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” The countdown began. Everyone in the room tensed visibly; every muscle in every inch of our bodies humming with nervous energy.…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pearl, by John Steinbeck, is about a man named Kino, and his wife Juana, and their baby named Coyotito. When Coyotito gets stung by a scorpion the doctor refuses to help the baby until he gets a payment. So Juana and Kino go search for a payment that will persuade the doctor to help their baby. When searching for a payment they find a great pearl that changes their lives forever. The pearl cause Kino to kill, fight, have greed, and other horrible things. So Kino’s discovery of that pearl was a stroke of bad luck.…

    • 609 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays