Preview

Pearl Harbor Rhetorical Analysis

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
237 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Pearl Harbor Rhetorical Analysis
Burtness, Paul S. and Warren U. Ober. "Communication Lapses Leading to the Pearl Harbor
Disaster." Historian, vol. 75, no. 4, Winter2013, pp. 740-759. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/hisn.12019.

Burtness discusses the different communication errors that happened during and after the Pearl Harbor event that involved multiple commanders. I am using this piece to show how bad communication could have been apart of the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Garry Clifford, J. and Masako Rachel Okura. "Side-Door Diplomacy: Herbert Hoover, FDR, and
United States-Japanese Negotiations, 1941." Peace & Change, vol. 38, no. 2, Apr. 2013, pp. 207-236. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1111/pech.12012.

Garry Clifford discusses how the blame for Pearl Harbor could possibly be put on the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In the movie Saving Private Ryan, American soldier private James Ryan losses all three of his brothers during World War Two. The Marshall, not wanting to allow a mother to lose all four of her sons gives orders to send a unit to find and rescue private Ryan, despite the possibility of letting many men die to save one mans life. In order to gain his staff's support for this decision the Marshall reads them a letter written by Abraham Lincoln to a mother who lost five sons during the civil war which contains various rhetorical techniques such as: ethos, allusions, as well as pathos coupled with powerful diction. Through these rhetorical techniques this letter is able to make a strong emotional impact on any viewers which is used by the Marshall as a tool of persuasion to effectively gain the support of his staff.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Throughout President Franklin Roosevelt’s Pearl Harbor speech, he uses various devices to appeal to the audience listening. Although, the most effective excerpt from the speech is when President Roosevelt depicts the resilience and determination of the United States to fight back, both figuratively and metaphorically, “With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us God” (paragraph 17). By accentuating the unity of the nation with “our” armed forces and “our” people, Mr. President utilizes both pathos and parallelism. Pathos is exerted by the use of the pronouns “our” and “we”, in which Roosevelt includes himself with the rest of the Americans involved…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pearl Harbor, we cannot just blame an entire group for the events of that day. The…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Attack on Pearl Harbor, inflammatory language is used as a persuasive technique to try and get the citizens of the United States angered and mournful about the bombing of pearl harbor. The point of writing this speech is to persuade Americans to support the war, and that there was a good reason to go to war. Also, he wanted to convince congress to declare war, which minutes later they did. He uses hate filled inflammatory language to appeal to the audience’s emotion, calling it an “unprovoked and dastardly” (Roosevelt 2) attack. By saying this, Roosevelt hopes to make it appear that the bad guys are the Japanese, which they are. He wishes to arouse the American citizens and get them to support his reasons to go to…

    • 344 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Former President George Bush used a lot of historical fact to justify his argument of invading Iraq. He said things such as: Iraq’s technological abilities, their weapons of mass destruction, and Saddam Hussein’s previous threats against the US. He sounds like he has significant evidence to back up his speech, until he said “Many people have asked how close Saddam Hussein is to developing a nuclear weapon. Well, we don’t know exactly…” This statement only disapproved his previous statements.…

    • 361 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Butow's Argument Analysis

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Butow supports his argument by stating that the militarists’ “attitudes” eradicated any thought for surrender. Providing primary sources from Marquis Kido, Japanese governmental and military officials, Butow offers evidence that provides historians with a new perspective. The new perspective that Butow focuses on examines the terms of surrender offered to the Japanese at the Potsdam Conference. Through his investigation of the Potsdam terms, the author argues that Japan would have surrendered much faster if the United States had retracted the idea of unconditional surrender. Based on Butow’s arguments future historians would develop the author’s initial findings through their research and viewpoints on the terms of unconditional surrender.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This investigation evaluates whether or not the dropping of the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki was necessary to make Japan surrender unconditionally. To assess the extent to which the deployment of nuclear weapons affected the Japanese decision to surrender unconditionally and if Japan was already prepared to do this prior to the use of the atomic bombs. The details and motivations of the United States to drop the bombs are explored as well as Japan’s peace negotiations with the United States and their progress prior to the U.S. choosing to use the bombs. Actions of the United States and Japan not related to the end of World War 2 are not assessed in this investigation.…

    • 2170 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Franklin D. Roosevelt asked “that the Congress declare that since the unprovoked and dastardly attack by Japan on Sunday, December 7th, 1941, a state of war has existed between the United States and the Japanese empire.” to the nation. Declaring a state of war with Japan and convincing the people to support the war effort. The Pearl Harbor address to the Nation delivered by Franklin D. Roosevelt is one of the most famous speeches in American history. Roosevelt uses many rhetorical strategies to convince his audiences and relay his intent to the people and Congress. I will address his audiences, rhetorical strategies, and my opinion on the persuasiveness of his speech.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History has been known to repeat itself when society does not learn from its past mistakes. In the novel World War Z by author Max Brooks, we are thrown directly into a world of utter chaos, mostly stemming from a rejection of scientific perception and insight.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    1983 In his book Infamy, John Toland suggests that Roosevelt knew about the coming attack on Pearl Harbor and let it happen; Gordon Prange’s At Dawn We Slept offers a detailed look at what all professional historians accept as the proper view of the events, mainly blaming human error and miscommunication and dismissing the idea of a conspiracy to take the county into World War II by an alleged “back door” of Pearl…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The prevention of Pearl Harbor abroad should have began months before the initial attack. With the growing monster of Japan raging on, the United States should have been wary of attack since the war’s infancy. In 1937, Japan embarks on…

    • 1401 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is apparent from Franklin D. Roosevelt's speech to Congress after the attack on Pearl Harbor that he wants to place the entire blame on the Japanese. He does not want to believe that the United States was a threat to them in any way. In his eyes, there was no just reason for the Japanese to bomb Pearl Harbor (yet at the end of the day, I don't think it is ever clear what one can consider “just” and “unjust” when it comes to war). According to Roosevelt, the Japanese must take full responsibility for the dissemination of the war. Although I believe it was completely wrong for the Japanese to senselessly bomb Pearl Harbor and clearly go against their peace promises, I cannot say that I don't think Roosevelt put his nation in a risky situation after forming a partnership with one of Japan's most powerful opponents (Great Britain). In his heart of hearts, I think that Roosevelt should have expected high tensions between the U.S. and the Japanese after this partnership. Japan was planning military actions against Great Britain, and knew that the U.S. had the ability to hinder their success. Therefore, in hopes to erase this factor, they decided to attack them. With this being said, there is no doubt that the Japanese played an integral role in propagating the…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Conflict in the Pacific

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages

    There were numerous strategic and political reasons that lead to the bombing of Pearl Harbour on December 7th, 1941. However nationalism, militarism and imperialistic notions were key influential factors, which together contributed to the almost complete annihilation of the US Pacific fleet. Based on Japan’s nationalistic beliefs of superiority over Asian nations, the surprise attack attempted to fulfill a change in the balance of power within South East Asia and expose the vulnerability of the West.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In Pearl Harbor and the Coming of the Pacific War by Akira Iriye, the author explores the events and circumstances that ended in the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, an American naval base. Iriye assembles a myriad of primary documents, such as proposals and imperial conferences, as well as essays that offer different perspectives of the Pacific War. Not only is the material in Pearl Harbor and the Coming of the Pacific War informative of the situation between Japan and the United States, but it also provides a global context that allows for the readers to interpret Pearl Harbor and the events leading up to it how they may. Ultimately, both Pearl Harbor and the subsequent Pacific War between Japan and the U.S. were unavoidable due to the fact that neither nation was willing to bow down to the demands of the other.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    So, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, in 1941, the United States reactions was justified for violent reaction, because of the attack by the Japanese. However, the people from Japan, may claim valid reason to attack, because of "Right Intention," but the United States action of dropping two separate nuclear weapons on two different cities, was an unjust war and extremely evil (Mattison). So, USA was justified in defending their island, but became unjust after the first nuclear attack, because it became responsible for the death of hundreds of thousands of women, children, and men. Destroying Hospitals, Churches, and Historical sites, which is illegal under international law or the Geneva Code of Conventions, but this happened before the United…

    • 143 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays