Preview

Doctor

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2562 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Doctor
2011

Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation By Dr. Minna Allarakhia Editor, CanBiotech Inc. Director, BioEndeavor Network

April 2011 @CanBiotech Inc.

2011

Open Innovation Case Study: Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation

Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation
By Dr. Minna Allarakhia Editor, CanBiotech Inc. Director, BioEndeavor Network

Abstract Pfizer recently announced the formation of a network of academic collaborators to accelerate the translation of basic science into biologics-based drugs. Pfizer anticipates establishing local Centers at each partner site enabling Pfizer and Academic Medical Center teams to work closely together. The University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), has signed on as the first of multiple partners. The partnerships will follow a venture capital-funded biotechnology start-up model, whereby Pfizer funds preclinical and clinical development programs and offers equitable intellectual property and ownership rights. Pfizer has the goal of expanding the Centers to Europe and Asia in 2012. Assuming eight projects per CTI, this could bring dozens of differentiated entities against targets into Pfizer’s pipeline. 1.0 Introduction Pfizer recently announced the formation of a network of academic collaborators to accelerate the translation of basic science into biologics-based drugs. According to Mikael Dolsten, M.D., Ph.D., president of Pfizer Worldwide Research & Development, the Centers represents a novel open innovation paradigm, combining the competencies of top academic research institutions with Pfizer 's leading drug development capabilities and research technologies. (Pfizer, 2010) The Centers for Therapeutic Innovation (CTI) will initially focus on collaborations within the U.S. Pfizer expects to expand into Europe and Asia in 2012. Each Center will be governed by a Joint Steering Committee (JSC)

comprised of Pfizer and Academic Medical Center (AMC) representatives who will provide leadership



References: 1) Allarakhia, M., Kilgour, D.M., Fuller, D., 2010. Modeling the incentive to participate in open source biopharmaceutical innovation. R&D Management 40, 50-66. 2) Bozeman, B., Boardman, C., 2003. Managing the new multipurpose multidisciplinary university research centers: Institutional innovation in the academic community. IMB Center for the Business of Government. 3) Call for Proposals for UCSF-Pfizer Center for Therapeutic Innovation, UCSF, December 2010. 4) Chesbrough, H.W., 2007. Why companies should have open business models. MIT Sloan Management Review 48, 22-28. 5) Chesbrough, H.W., 2003. The era of open innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44, 35-41. 6) Corley, E.A., Boardman, P.C., Bozeman, B., 2006. Design and the management of multi-institutional research collaborations: Theoretical implications from two case studies. Research Policy 35, 975-993. 7) Geels, F.W., 2002. Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a casestudy. Research Policy 31, 1257−1274. 8) Jarvis, L. Pfizer Unveils Academic Network, C&EN, November 2010. 9) Moller, K. K., Svahn, S., 2009. How to influence the birth of new business fields. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 450−458. 10) Pfizer Launches Global Centers for Therapeutic Innovation, a Network of Research Partnerships, With University of California, San Francisco, PR Newswire, November 2010. 11) Powell, W.W., Koput, K.K., Smith-Doerr, L., 1996. Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Network of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 41, 116-145. 12) Rampersad, G., Quester, P., Troshani, I., 2010. Managing innovation networks: Exploratory evidence from ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology networks. Industrial Marketing Management 39, 793805. 13) Ratner, M, 2011. Pfizer reaches out to academia—again. Nature Biotechnology 29, 3-4. 14) Rockefeller joins Pfizer’s Global Centers For Therapeutic Innovation, The Rockefeller University, April 2011. 15) Roijakkers, N., Hagedoorn, J., 2006. Interfirm R&D partnering in pharmaceutical biotechnology since 1975: Trends, patterns, and networks. Research Policy, 35, 431−446. 16) Seven New York Research Hospitals Join Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation, GEN News, January 2011. 17) www.pfizer.com, 2011. ©CanBiotech Inc. 2011 Pfizer’s Centers for Therapeutic Innovation Page 7

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    [ 4 ]. Morgan, Steve, and Clare Mochrie. "Pharmaceutical Innovation: Can health and economic goals be met?" Centre for Health Services and Policy Research (July 2008): 1-9…

    • 1012 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Cambridge Labs Case Analysis

    • 5443 Words
    • 22 Pages

    Standing, S., Standing, C., & Lin, C. (2008). A framework for managing knowledge in strategic alliances in the biotechnology sector. Systems research & behavioral science, 25(6), 783-796. Doi: 10.1002/sres.861…

    • 5443 Words
    • 22 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Adneux case study

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages

    As an emerging private biotechnology company, Adnexus Therapeutics Inc faces not only the pressure from those established big companies but also obstacles in gathering enough fund. Based on such situation, Dr. John Mendlein strongly recommended that the company find a partner with sufficient monetary and expertise resources. That’s where BMS appeared, showing great interest in ATI’s invention and the cooperation programme. Now the ATI achieved great progress and the future seems promising. BMS becomes more and more serious about purchasing the company’s outright. However, whether to keep the collaborative partnership or to pursuit independent development is hard for ATI to decide. What’s more, the next emphasis on Angiocept or Adnectins reamins unknown.…

    • 362 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Laperche, B., & Lefebvre, G. (2012). The globalization of Research & Development in industrial corporations: Towards “reverse innovation”? Retrieved January 17, 2015, from http://www.cairn.info/zen.php?ID_ARTICLE=JIE_010_0053…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    doctor

    • 2435 Words
    • 14 Pages

    5 In time critical patients, treatment should be limited to airway, breathing and circulation only a. TRUE…

    • 2435 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Questions 6

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The pharmaceutical industry plays a pivotal role in the health care system. Without the pharmaceutical industry, health care would not evolve into what it is today. The reason why it plays such an important role in health care is because it helps address challenges associated with modern day diseases and illnesses. It controls prevent, treat, and cure many types of diseases. In support, according to Williams and Torren, “ Biotechnology offers new approaches to discovery, design, and production of drugs and vaccines, and diagnostics.”…

    • 535 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Pharmanet-i3, a subsidiary of inVentive Health, is a world leading clinical research organization committed to the advancement of health around the world. The mission of Pharmanet-i3 is to be a strategic partner to companies that develop therapeutic drugs, and aim to bring drugs to the public that treat disease and improve the quality of life. The company will operate within the industry’s highest quality standards with uncompromising integrity, ethics, and respect for employees, study participants, the environment, and the communities in which the employees live and work. Shareholders can expect superior returns through the implementation of a successful growth strategy (Pharmanet-I3, n.d.).…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Yamada reorganization of drug discovery at GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) following a merger to combat bureaucracy in decision making, approval, and authorization. This reorganization was necessary for the continued success of the company. Often the process for drug discovery and market is a slow and tedious process which can cost a company a lot in resources and financially. The smaller biotech companies are able to move quicker and push new drugs to market faster. The shift, Yamada thinks, will help produce an entrepreneurial environment akin to a smaller, biotechnology outfit. This reorganization placed nearly 2,000 research scientists into six centers of excellence in drug discovery (CEDD). Each CEDD focused on a small set of therapeutic areas and possessed decision rights over the progression of pharmaceutical compounds through the early stages of development. These groups managed the pipeline from Lead Optimization through Proof of Concept. Each CEDD had full control over its own budget which could be spent internally or externally to deliver their best possible pipeline. The goals in each of these moves was to drive accountability deeper into the organization, reduce central oversight as much as necessary and foster a “biotech-like” atmosphere in a very large bio/pharmaceutical company.…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Doctor

    • 2483 Words
    • 9 Pages

    You understand that database technology can dramatically improve your ability to analyze information, compared to spreadsheet technology, and assist you in developing your strategic plans for the cafe. To help you familiarize yourself with databases and their associated business value you need to create a report detailing the basics of databases and why they are better for running a business than spreadsheet applications. Be sure to provide a detailed explanation of relational databases along with their associated business advantages.…

    • 2483 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the past decade, increasing amounts of dollars have been spent on drug development yet the amount of new drugs entering the market per year remains the same. Furthermore with 200 billion dollars of patents expiring in the past four years (Witty, 2010), innovative pharmaceutical companies will need to look at new approaches to discover drugs. With the human genome being sequenced in 2003, a new field of science was created and an optimistic future for drug discovery.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Pfizer's Strategic Plan

    • 3951 Words
    • 16 Pages

    Pfizer is a New York City based major drug producer, ranking first in pharmaceutical sales in the U.S., with 2005 revenues of 56.7 billion. With almost 60 billion in Revenue, Pfizer remains the industry's behemoth, overseeing the most ambitious research agenda for any company in the world. Pfizer's is spending on R&D supports 12,000 scientists. Pfizer's research increased 3 percent in 2004, to 7.7 billion, after a 2003 increase of 44 percent that is attributable to the acquisition of Pharmacia. At the end of 2004, Pfizer had 225 projects in 18 therapeutic areas under active development. Pfizer is studying 145 new molecular entities and 80 extensions of existing drugs. An additional 400 compounds are in discovery phase of testing. In 2004, 43 discovery projects advanced into preclinical testing; 23 projects moved from preclinical research into human trials. Pfizer has eight subsidiaries, divisions and affiliates, and has over 120,000 employees worldwide (Pfizer, 2005). There are four main divisions at Pfizer, consisting of Healthcare, Consumer Care, Food Science, and Animal Health. Pfizer manufactures its products in 150 countries. Pfizer has sales offices in every state, and has Corporate Research Center in Groton, CT, Corporate Headquarters in New York, NY and International Headquarters in Nagoya, Japan and Sandwich, England. The executive members of Pfizer coupled with the reviews from Wall Street and the 50 percent cut in company stock in 2001 has forced Pfizer to demand more accountability from all of it's 115,000 employees world wide. Pfizer realizes that their operating expenses, their size, and their attention to detail has suffered due primarily to their size. Pfizer has also accepted that by the year 2010 (Pfizer, 2005). Politicians and Economist believe that Pfizer has to trim some of the fat from the hostile takeover of Warner…

    • 3951 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Knowledge management is systematic management of intellectual capital and organizational knowledge as well as the associated processes of creating, gathering, organizing, retrieving, leveraging, and using intellectual capital for the purposes of improving organizations and the people in them. Through these processes, organizations capture and store data and information in a central or distributed electronic environment—often referred to as a knowledge base. Knowledge management involves an intentional effort to stimulate the sharing and use of knowledge, instead of relying on ad-hoc and informal knowledge sharing activities, while at the same time keeping the knowledge secured within the organization and its selected partners. Knowledge management is about changing the way that employees create, share and use their knowledge, so that the organization retains and builds upon the knowledge. It is the cultural aspects of transforming individual-held implicit knowledge to organizational-shared explicit knowledge.…

    • 4159 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    James Love got me started on this project and I have appreciated his encouragement and…

    • 11293 Words
    • 68 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    High Technology Acquisitions

    • 8869 Words
    • 36 Pages

    * Company Background: Pfizer is a research-based global pharmaceutical company. The company discovers, develops, manufactures and markets medicines for humans and animals, as well as consumer products. In order To maximize new opportunities in biomedical research, and bring more innovative…

    • 8869 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the various purviews of its functioning, one unit of the company is called iMed (Innovative Medicines & Early Development) Biotech. iMed launched a website to support various open source innovation programmes and to facilitate better research and collaborations with academia, governments, industry and industry. The main agenda is directed at the scientist around the globe to access AstraZeneca’s Open Innovation Programmes which are inclusive of the…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays