Please complete this four-part guide, and submit for the collaboration component.
1. Collaboration lesson/task description: Describe the lesson or task you completed collaboratively in a paragraph consisting of five or more sentences.
We went through a number of different triangles and justified them with the appropriate postulate or theorem. In addition, we chose, in groups of two (or three), 2 triangles out of a series of choices and decided whether they were congruent or similar, and justified our statement with a postulate (Or theorem.)
2. Peer and self-evaluation: Rate each member of the team, including yourself, according to each of the performance criterion below.
I honestly had no problem with my group. They all worked hard and completed all assigned tasks
3 = above average
2 = average
1 = below average
Peer and Self-EvaluationCriteriaStudent NamesListened to others Me- 3 Peers- 3Showed respect for others' opinions Me- 3 Peers- 3 Completed assigned dutiesMe- 3 Peers- 3 Participated in discussionsMe- 2 Peers- 2/3 Attended meetingsThere were no meetings Stayed on taskMe- 3 Peers- 3 Offered relevant informationMe- 3 Peers- 3 Completed work adequatelyMe- 3 Peers- 3 Completed work on time (with no reminders)Me- 3 Peers- 3 Offered appropriate feedback when necessaryMe- 3 Peers 3 3. Self-reflection: Respond to the following in two to three sentences each.
Explain what you enjoyed most about working with others on this lesson/task.
It was interesting for me to see in action how Geometry, or math in general, is not subjective. It is the same no matter who is doing it or why they do it like that. The result is always the same.
Explain how your team dealt with conflict.
My team did not have any conflict. We worked together on the problems and ended successfully
Explain how you feel others felt about your participation in the lesson/task.
I feel that I contributed well to the questions and conversation that