Preview

Does Bicameralism Matter?

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
9541 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Bicameralism Matter?
Does Bicameralism Matter?

Michael Cutrone Dept. of Politics Princeton University Nolan McCarty Woodrow Wilson School Princeton University

1. Introduction Perhaps the most conspicuous variation in modern legislatures concerns the practice of granting legislative authority to two separate chambers with distinct memberships. While the majority of national governments empower but a single chamber, at least a third of national legislatures practice some form of bicameralism as do 49 of the 50 American state governments.1 Scholars have made a number of arguments to explain the emergence of bicameral legislatures. One of the most common arguments for the emergence of bicameralism in Britain and its American colonies is that it helped to preserve “mixed governments,” to ensure that upper class elements of society were protected (Wood 1969, Tsebelis and Money 1997). In such settings, bicameralism allowed the upper chamber, dominated by aristocrats, to have a veto on policy. More generally, an explicit role of some bicameral systems has been the protection of some minority who is overrepresented in the upper chamber. A second rationale for bicameralism is the preservation of federalism. The United States, Germany, and other federal systems use a bicameral system in order to ensure the representation of the interests of individual states and provinces, as well as the population

Tsebelis and Money (1997, 15) define bicameral legislatures as “those whose deliberations involve two distinct assemblies.” This definition, however, masks considerable variation in the roles of each chamber in policymaking. Many “upper” chambers have legislative prerogatives that are limited in important ways; for instance, the British House of Lords is unable to originate monetary legislation and, at best, can delay bills for a year rather than permanently veto those they disagree with. For our purposes, we wish to define bicameralism more narrowly. We define bicameralism as the requirement



Bibliography: Adrian, Charles. 1960. State and Local Governments. New York: McGraw-Hill. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Alan Gerber, and James Snyder. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court Ordered Resditricting and Public Expenditure in the American States,” American Political Science Review 96(4):767-778. Ansolabehere, Stephen, James Snyder, and Michael Ting. 2003. “Bargaining in Bicameral Legislatures: When and Why does Malapportionment Matter?” American Political Science Review 97(3): 471-481. Austen-Smith, David and Jeffrey S. Banks. 1996. “Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury Theorem” American Political Science Review, 90(1):3445. Atlas, Cary M., Thomas W. Gilligan, Robert J. Hendershott, and Mark A. Zupan. 1995. “Slicing the Federal Government Net Spending Pie: Who Wins, Who Loses, and Why.” American Economic Review 85:624-629. Baron, David P., and John A. Ferejohn. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 89: 1181-1206. Binder, Sarah A. 1999. “The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-1996” American Political Science Review 93(3):519-533. Binder, Sarah A. 2003. Stalemate. Washington D.C: Brookings Institution Press. Bottom, William P., Cheryl L. Eavey; Gary J. Miller; Jennifer Nicoll Victor. 2000. “The Institutional Effect on Majority Rule Instability: Bicameralism in Spatial Policy Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 44(3):523-540. Brady, David W., and Craig Volden. 1997. Revolving Gridlock: Politics and Policy from Carter to Clinton. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press. Chiou, Fang-Yi and Lawrence Rothenberg. 2003. “When Pivotal Politics Meets Party Politics.” American Journal of Political Science 47(3): 503-522. Cox, Gary W. and Mathew McCubbins. 2003. Legislative Leviathan Revisited. Unpublished book manuscript. Cox, Gary W. and Richard McKelvey. 1984. “A Ham Sandwich Theory for General Measures.” Social Choice and Welfare 1:75-83. Crémer, Jacques and Thomas R. Palfrey. 1999. “Political Confederation.” American Political Science Review 93(1):69-83. 34 Diermeier, Daniel, Hulya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo. 2003. “Bicameralism and Government Formation.” Working paper, Dept. of Economics, University of Pennsylvania. Diermeier, Daniel and Roger Myerson. 1999. “Bicameralism and its Consequences for Legislative Organization.” American Economic Review 89(5):1182-1196. Druckman, James N. and Michael F. Thies. 2002. “The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4):760-771. Dye, Thomas. 1966. Politics, Economics, and the Public: Policy Outcomes in the American States. Chicago: Rand McNally. Ferejohn, John and Charles Shipan. 1990. “Congressional Influence on the Bureaucracy.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 6(SI):1-20. Hammond, Thomas H. and Gary J. Miller. 1987. “The Core of the Constitution.” American Political Science Review 81(4):1155-1174. Heller, William B. 1997. “Bicameralism and Budget Deficits: The Effect of Parliamentary Structure on Government Spending.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 12(4):485-516. Heller, William B. 2001. “Political Denials: The Policy Effects of Intercameral Partisan Differences in Bicameral Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 17(1):34-61. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Jewell, Malcolm E. 1962. The State Legislature: Politics and Practice. New York: Random House. Lee, Francis and Bruce Oppenheimer. 1999. Sizing Up the Senate: The Unequal Consequences of Equal Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lijphart, Arendt. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press. Longley, Lawrence and Walter Oleszek. 1989. Bicameral Politics: Conference Committees in Congress. New Haven: Yale University Press. McCarty, Nolan. 2000. “Proposal Rights, Veto Rights, and Political Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science, 44(3):506-522. 35 McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. The Realignment of National Politics and the Income Distribution. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Studies on Understanding Economic Inequality. McCarty, Nolan, Keith Poole and Howard Rosenthal. 2000. “Congress and the Territorial Expansion of the United States” (with) in New Directions in Studying the History of the U.S. Congress. Eds: David Brady and Mathew McCubbins. Stanford: Stanford University Press. McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12:472-482. Poole, Keith. 1998. “Estimating a Basic Space From A Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science, 42:. 954-993. Public International Law and Policy Group. 2003. Establishing a Stable Democratic Constitutional Structure in Iraq: Some Basic Considerations. The Century Foundation. Riker, William. 1992. “The Justification of Bicameralism” International Political Science Review 12(1): 101-116. Rogers, James. 1998. “Bicameral Sequence: Theory and State Legislative Evidence.” American Journal of Political Science 42(4):1025-1060. Rogers, James. 2001. “An Informational Rationale for Congruent Bicameralism” Journal of Theoretical Politics 13(2):123-151. Rogers, James. 2003. “The Impact of Bicameralism on Legislative Production” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(4):509-528. Schofeld, Norman. 1978. “Instability of Simple Dynamic Games” Review of Economic Studies 45:575-594. Shapley, Lloyd and Martin Shubik. 1954. “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System.” American Political Science Review 48(3):787792. Thies, Michael F. 1998. “When Will Pork Leave the Farm? Institutional Bias in Japan and the United States.” Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23( 4): 467-492. Tsebelis, George. 1993. “The Core, The Uncovered Set, and Conference Committees in Bicameral Legislatures.” Unpublished Manuscript, University of California, Los Angeles. 36 Tsebelis, George and Jeanette Money. 1997. Bicameralism. New York: Cambridge University Press. Weingast, Barry. 1998. “Political Stability and Civil War: Institutions, Commitment, and American Democracy.” In Analytical Narratives. Eds. Robert Bates, Avner Greif, Margaret Levi, Jean-Laurent Rosenthal, and Barry Weingast. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Weingast, Barry and Charles Stewart. 1992. “Stacking the Senate, Changing the Nation: Republican Rotten Boroughs, Statehood Politics, and American Political Development.” Studies in American Political Development. 223-271. Wood, Gordon. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776-1787. New York: Norton. 37

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Eco Bottle Lab Report

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages

    1. The framers created a bicameral legislature because of the Great Compromise at the Constitutional Convention which stated that one house’s representation will be based on a state’s population and the other would have equal representation. Another reason is that it would help prevent tyranny because both houses can “check” each other to make sure one does not get to powerful. One power unique to the House of Representatives is that revenue bills must originate from the House; the framers gave this power to the House because the House of Representatives is more representative of the entire population than the Senate is. One power unique to the Senate is that they are the ones that try the President for impeachment; the framers gave this power to the Senate because they reflect the state’s interests and also because they are more “mature” than the House of Representatives since the required age is higher.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    References: Bibby, J. (1979). Political parties and federalism: The Republican National Committee involvement in gubernatorial and legislative elections. Publius, 229--236.…

    • 828 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author asserts that the problem with American government is not the party but is instead the system of voting that creates the parties. The author begins by first stating the main problem with the two party system mainly the lack of choice it provides for the public. The author then compares our system with its plurality rules with the European parliamentary system of proportional representation. The author also explains that in some areas one party dominates elections in that area so the public has no way of really affecting government policy because they are only presented with one choice. The author points to the old solid south, which was solidly controlled by democrats, as an example. The author believes our two party system forces voters to be pick the lesser of two evils. He supports this claim by pointing to the fact that the two parties can only ever present two sides of an issue and this leaves the rest of the possible choices out of the picture.…

    • 632 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Mayhew argues that a divided government should not affect the enacting law process because “democracy can function well enough as an assortment of decentralized, unconnected incursions into public affairs” (182). In addition, Mayhew assures the readers that “micro-management” was not a result of only a divided government, but a result of a divided government and an “unusual shock to the system such a Watergate” (184). The reason why a divided government is ill-viewed is because it is usually associated with negative events in the American history. A divided government is not supposed to be viewed negatively because, unlike in the British government, political parties “seem to play more of a role as ‘policy factions’” than government instruments…

    • 580 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Bicameralism has supporters and critics. Its defenders echo the position of the framers of the American Constitution, arguing that bicameralism provides an important check and balance on the legislative branch.…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Wanna's Analysis

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How is it we see a distinct change in how federalism is portrayed and influenced with every new style of government? The way problems and politics have influenced federalism suggests that the manipulation of politics and world influences in fact changes the fundamentals and delivery of a federal model. It is apparent that a federal model 90 years ago represents little of what the new and emerging models are or may become. Between both major political parties we have seen a separation in the way our federal nation would operate. Federalism has been strongly shaped by party ideology and platforms. (Hollander and Papatan 2007) suggest that the changes in our federalism model is keeping the cutting edge of reform, finally seeing the progress being made towards a better way to conduct business. Difficulties with effecting reform will be that someone has to lose out. Both involve trade-offs of efficiency with equity and will face opposition by those adversely affected.…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    At times parties differ on important facts such as if there is evidence of human behavior affecting change in climate. (Democracy in America,2014).Partisan polarization interferes with law making process which may also have adverse effects on policy making actors, more positive policy making theory have shown that inability to pass correct legislation allows greater independence judicial and executive actors of the policy making process. Polarization has two effects on policies; it either leads to creation of new policies or extinction of the existing policies. Due to dispersion in authority of policy making system in the U.S, development of public policies…

    • 1173 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Gerrymandering

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Forgette Richard, Garner Andrew, and Winkle John. “Do redistricting principles and practices affect US state legislative electoral competition? State Politics and policy quarterly, 20(9) (2009): 151 175.…

    • 1050 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Polarization In Congress

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Polarization in Congress leads to less bills reaching the President for review. While a Congress that passes every bill it meets provides no benefits, Congressmen should not shirk their duties primarily due to polarization. Representatives’ achievements for the term should instead be limited on properly in-depth debate and discussion relating to the legislature they need to pass. However, at an increasing rate, senators drop bills out of the law-generating cycle (Andris, 10). Andris, et al, explains: “The number of bills introduced seems to . . . [correlate] with a decrease in Congressional productivity.” (10). Further, Andris et al also finds that in Congress, “The average number of disagreements on roll call votes between [congressmen]…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unity is key to efficiency, however as seen by Wilson’s, the lack of efficiency is a major contributor of the decentralization of Congress. Another factor that contributes to the lack of a unitary system is the idea that there is no unity between the congressmen, and this calls for a lack of organization and production. The existence of so many committees and representatives within the decentralized system shows…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The electoral politics of Congress may center largely on individual candidates and campaigns, but it is the collective results of congressional elections that shape the course of national politics. Subject of the chapter →how the millions of individual voting decisions in hundreds of districtly individual contests combine to produce intelligible election results.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Partisan Elections

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In the following essay I will be talking about the disadvantages and advantages of partisan elections for state politics. I will also examine the last couple year's election results and costs. Finally, I will discuss if partisanship made a difference in the vote, as well as if a judge should be decided by partisan vote. In the next couple paragraphs I will talk more specifically about these topics.…

    • 707 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Texas Politics

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Texas is a state that has always been recognized for its size and politics. Elections are a huge part of democratic societies that are intended for citizens to choose their public leaders and approve the policies set by candidates. Political parties and interest groups also play a key role in shaping opportunities for public participation. Most Texans and historians know that the Democratic Party’s historical dominance is important to state politics. It is less likely that people are not aware of the consequences of the one-party system for public participation and democracy in Texas. Like many of the rim South states, the white elitist belonged to the Democratic Party which stemmed from the end of Reconstruction until the late 20th Century. To understand the place of political parties in a democratic nation, Eldersveld, a scholar on the subject gives the definition of party as “a group that competes for political power by contesting elections, mobilizing social interests, and advocating ideological positions, thus linking citizens to the political system” (Hill). Texas can be best understood by analyzing its history as a democratic party turned republican, voter turnout, interest groups and other facets that have an impact on voter trends.…

    • 2706 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ex-felons voting rights

    • 2047 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Nichols, John. The Nation Voting and the Fight for Democracy: The Battle for Congress. New York, 2012…

    • 2047 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics