There can be many different opinions on this topic, like how not all people can sustain prosperity. Globalization can help a large group of people or hurt a large group of people, people that can afford the product that is shipped over is more likely to maintain sustainable prosperity, same as for the people that are selling. Then there is the people who can not afford to buy these products and those who do not have enough resources to sell to others. Not all people have the benefits of these so that is why the extent globalization contributes to sustainable prosperity for all people is a false accusation, people should understand that the greater group is not being affected and still can not sustain prosperity.
Water is a great example as why not everyone is granted with sustainable prosperity, shipbreaking is destroying our waters and will never be fixed. Water will only help the people that are provided this necessity. Ship breakers are dumping the chemichals and scraps right into the ocean and contaminating the water, because of …show more content…
With increased jobs means decreased wages which means everyone is now making less money but there is more jobs to go around which mean greater portion of people have jobs. NAFTA was a agreement between the us and Canada in 1989, to increase labour so people have more jobs, which has been provided but has meant everyones income has dropped. Not everyone is being helped by these moves.
All of these topics are expressing why this question is saying that we can not all sustain prosperity, we all have differnent ways of life and different circumstances. Some of us might be more likely to sustain prosperity based on where we live and where we work, who are you connected too as a person? Who are you? All relate back too how we are all