Preview

Does Questioning Authority Make a Society Stronger?

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
350 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Does Questioning Authority Make a Society Stronger?
It is very important to question the ideas and decisions of people in positions of authority in today’s society. Although some respect for authority is necessary for a group to function, questioning the people in charge makes us better thinkers. In today’s society, we have many questions about the choices and decisions some of our leaders make. It is just up to us to confront the person and explain their issue or problem in a respectful tone. In order for a society to be fully functional, the people who govern must be at peace with the governed, or else all hell breaks loose. For example, President Obama has recently passed the Health Care Bill that apparently would help turn the economy around, but reduce the social status of the middle class. According to polls, a majority of American’s did not approve of this bill as it was being passed, but there was no one person who stood up to say something to the president. The people must make their voices heard in order for a government to be stable and acceptable. To question the ideas of officials is only enhancing the final decision they are going to make, therefore bettering the country as a whole and putting the official in a favorable position amongst his people. As citizens, it is our right to input our opinions into the minds of our public leaders so that they are constantly thinking about what is best for all of us, not just for a specific section. If not, the government would become greedy and reap some of the benefits themselves and not make it known to the rest of society. Questioning the decisions of our officials forces all concerned to defend old ideas and decisions and to consider new ones. Sometimes, it can even correct old errors in thought and put and end to wrong actions. It is our duty as citizens of the world to question the sometimes harsh decisions the people in charge make that effect our environment and correct the errors in a well mannered

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    The rise of the papacy came at a time when the Roman Empire collapsed and there was chaos as it related to the bishops who held office in Rome and what religion would be at the forefront of the representation of the west or east of Rome since its demise. The term “papacy” (papatus), meant to distinguish the Roman bishop’s office from all bishoprics (episcopatus), and The Head of the Roman Catholic Church the pope is considered the successor of Peter and the vicar of Christ (Elwell, p. 888). The “pope” is a terms of endearment which means “father” and this was the title of the most important and influential bishops in the early church. The church at Rome nevertheless enjoyed and wanted to preserve the original apostolic faith and the prominence, and they as bishops also owned its apostolic “founders” and to its political setting, and this led to the inspiration of these bishops to exercise greater leadership in Rome and abroad (Elwell, p. 888). Most emperors and patriarchs of Constantinople, challenged the bishops and their beliefs by saying that the church in Rome is new and improved but that they are still believe in the old Roman church. The popes or bishops were not moved by their words and they knew that they were not living up to the apostolic ways of the founding fathers who came before them and that their primacy was derived from Peter and not from their political setting which in turn made their claim to fame to be truly based upon the “apostolic”(Elwell, p. 888). The Apostle Peter was sent to Rome by Jesus to build God’s Church. In Matthew 16:18, NLT, says 18 Now I say to you that you are Peter (which means ‘rock’),[a] and upon this rock I will build my church, and all the powers of hell[b]…

    • 1506 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Actions that are made by an individual that may seem like the best decision in their own eyes may not be the best decision to someone else or even a group of people, so is the same with the government. When the founding fathers drafted the constitution they realized that not one person or specific branch should hold all authority over any one decision, so they developed a system of checks and balances. This system serves as a mediator between branches of government so that each decision is made in the utmost confidence. Having been weighed, measured and determined the wisest decision, then it will be appointed and passed up the chain of command so to speak.…

    • 515 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    First of all, our goverment is founded on the right's of the people to speak freely during these dire times. Also, the power of the people not to be condemed by their officers of the goverment.…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the true democracy that the government claims the United States to be, the people are in control. It is the public’s voice that is meant to be heard and the state of the union that is meant to be altered according to that voice. The power is meant to lie with the everyday American citizen and all of his or her brethren, not with Washington. After all, the Constitution, made effective in 1789, begins with the words “We the People,” not “We the Government.” It is this distinction that is supposed to elevate our nation, placing it above the countries around the rest of the world, and it is this power of the people that creates a better-functioning society.…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In my eyes the government should put the people first 100% of the time. If leaders don’t make decisions based on what the people want, it leads to an unbalance and a disconnect between the people and government. That’s why so many people today distrust the government because they feels as if the government doesn’t represent them, like their voice isn’t heard. People in power should be the first ones to help in times of trouble. They should be a rock and bright light for those who feel hopeless. People in power should assist in every possible way in times of tragedy because its shows that you care about the everyday person, not just the person that cast a vote. In America, the President should be the one everybody can count on to be a symbol of hope and freedom. After all, the President is the leader of the free world. All in all, people in power should always have the best interest of the people in mind and should always be an honest and reliable outlet for their people.…

    • 598 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Many people feel that government policies have little impact on their lives and that they think there is no point to say out because they are policies all they need to do is to follow them but then there are other people who thinks that there is an issue because of the policy that affect them directly and they can feel very angry about this policy and they might want to protest about it.…

    • 1752 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Randall Meechum Analysis

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “Let us not forget that government is ourselves and not an alien power over us. The ultimate rulers of our democracy are not a president and senators and congressmen and government officials, but the voters of this country.” Franklin D. Roosevelt…

    • 801 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In today’s society, denouncing a leader is more common than it used to be as we see in today's politics and everyday life. By denouncing a leader, society critiques them because they do not think of them as humans with the right policies or beliefs. However, every human on earth thinks differently and sees life from a different viewpoint, making everyone discrete. As a result of criticising a leader, a person is simply stating what they think by censuring their leaders who they do not see eye-to-eye with. Equality 7-2521 reviles the leaders in his community, but not directly to their faces. But is it wrong to reject your commanders in chief, or is it right? Should men and women be able to state why they think their leaders are wrongdoers or…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only way to truthfully test authority and the people who submit themselves to it, is in a real life situation. When humans are pushed outside of our comfort zones, it becomes more difficult to feel comfortable and easier to feel the pressure to conform to this authority. Living in the real world, authority has become a major part of society. “Always respect your elders” is something that a majority of children are told time and time…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A voice, no matter how small can create the biggest changes. Some of the greatest uprisings in human history have begun with one person or a small group of people simply voicing the shared opinions of the general populace. If we think back to the time of our revolutionary era, we see founding fathers such as Alexander Hamilton and Samuel Adams speaking out and writing against their unjust government. While mostly everybody agreed with the opinions of these men, the stark contrast between men like them and the people was that they were vocal about it. Had it not been for this small group of our Founding Fathers, the war may perhaps have never been started because nobody was brave enough to speak out for their…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    John Adams stated that “Government is instituted for the common good; for the protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness of the people; and not for profit, honor, or private interest of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, the people alone have an incontestable, unalienable, and indefeasible right to institute government; and to reform, alter, or totally change the same, when their protection, safety, prosperity, and happiness require it.” Federalists believed this, and fought verbal and written battles against the Anti-Federalists, who disagreed with John Adams. Anti-Federalists believed that in an elite democracy, the elite’s would get greedy and selfish, and only worry about themselves. As I’m on the Federalist side, I believe that John Adams was correct in his statement, and that the government is only trying to uphold the rights and liberties that each citizen ought to have.…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    raises the fact that as a society it is up to individuals for an open debate or democratic decision…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4.4 Describe how to support an individual to question or challenge decisions concerning them that are made by others?…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some doubt that the problems this country faces can be fixed by the Government, and, I must admit, I agree with them on most issues. How does a government change the way people look at…

    • 681 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    care

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Describe how to support an individual to question or challenge decisions concerning them that are made by others.…

    • 416 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays