Dog Eat Dog World Analysis
I decided to choose question four, which asked what the consequences would be if the
government ceased to exist. For starters, there would be two paths society could take on as a
result of no government. We as a people, could unite and make a primitive system of bartering
such as back in the pre-industrialization ages, or there would be total anarchy. Likely the latter
would ensue, as we are simply a greedy species biologically programmed to survive, thus we
would become hostile towards one another in our attempt to survive. Everyone would fend for
themselves as the phrase, “dog-eat-dog world” becomes more characteristic of society. It is
already a dog-eat-dog world even with a government, however the anarchy that ensues would …show more content…
This lifestyle evolution has been propagated ever since the roaring twenties
as the American Dream was a goal in life for most people. Money, money, money, it makes the
world go round, but also is the root cause of greediness, therefore the root cause of war.
Governments certainly do evil things with the money they obtain from the poor, but for the most
part, it’s either a choice of living in a society where everyone is united under a system of money,
with infrastructure, job specialization, material things, or a society where everyone fends for
themselves and becomes self-dependent. People can go on tangents about this, but i’ll end this by
telling you to look outside. Look around you, buildings cars, houses. Now look in your wallet, if
you have a lot of money, you feel somewhat happy. It’s just a piece of paper in the end, but it
helped you obtain a house, a car, food etc. This is the result of having a system of government. In
other words, the government has helped you satisfy your materialistic and greedy lifestyle. Feels
good right? Now not to generalize a 7 billion population of humans, but most of them are in fact
materialistic and greedy. The government helps them support their addiction to greed, in
government ceased to exist. For starters, there would be two paths society could take on as a
result of no government. We as a people, could unite and make a primitive system of bartering
such as back in the pre-industrialization ages, or there would be total anarchy. Likely the latter
would ensue, as we are simply a greedy species biologically programmed to survive, thus we
would become hostile towards one another in our attempt to survive. Everyone would fend for
themselves as the phrase, “dog-eat-dog world” becomes more characteristic of society. It is
already a dog-eat-dog world even with a government, however the anarchy that ensues would …show more content…
This lifestyle evolution has been propagated ever since the roaring twenties
as the American Dream was a goal in life for most people. Money, money, money, it makes the
world go round, but also is the root cause of greediness, therefore the root cause of war.
Governments certainly do evil things with the money they obtain from the poor, but for the most
part, it’s either a choice of living in a society where everyone is united under a system of money,
with infrastructure, job specialization, material things, or a society where everyone fends for
themselves and becomes self-dependent. People can go on tangents about this, but i’ll end this by
telling you to look outside. Look around you, buildings cars, houses. Now look in your wallet, if
you have a lot of money, you feel somewhat happy. It’s just a piece of paper in the end, but it
helped you obtain a house, a car, food etc. This is the result of having a system of government. In
other words, the government has helped you satisfy your materialistic and greedy lifestyle. Feels
good right? Now not to generalize a 7 billion population of humans, but most of them are in fact
materialistic and greedy. The government helps them support their addiction to greed, in