Any nurse that is licensed would have seen that Dr. Pancake was not practicing proper
Any nurse that is licensed would have seen that Dr. Pancake was not practicing proper
“She then was sent to Allegiance’s wound care clinic, where it was discovered she had a staph infection, according to the lawsuit. She was admitted to the hospital for six days. Because of the doctor's untimely diagnosis and treatment of Pagan's wound, the area became more and more infected and other symptoms and problems developed and persisted, Pagan and her lawyers said.” “The hospital wound care clinic discharged Pagan in 2010, the complaint states, but her treatment has not come to an end. She has a large scarred area, which sometimes “opens up,” Pagan said, and areas of deformed tissue. She sees infectious disease control doctors and takes medication.” “After a 10-day trial before Circuit Judge Thomas Wilson, jurors found Dr. Rouchdi Rifai had a duty to meet a standard of care and he breached that duty, causing Pagan’s injuries and physical and economic losses. Jurors awarded her $500,000 in damage for pain, suffering, scarring and disfigurement and associated mental or emotional distress and $382,000 in loss of income. Further, they found she…
Facts: At a teaching hospital, Mullins who is the plaintiff marked or ticked the section of approval form that consented to “the presence of healthcare learners”. She was assured by the attending Anaesthesiologist that she would handle the anaesthesia. However, when Mullins was unconscious during the surgery, a student (VanHoey) was allowed by the Anaesthesiologist to perform intubation. Mullins’ oesophagus was lacerated by VanHoey as it was VanHoey’s first day practicing on a live patient.…
Ultimately, the plaintiff settled with the doctor, who was apportioned 80% of the liability by the jury under the finding of corporate negligence (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). However, what was uncovered proved to be far more problematic, as the hospital failed to uncover information about Dr. Salinsky that would impact his performance, such as the fact that he lost his staff privileges at St. Anthony’s Hospital in 1971, had his orthopedic privileges revoked at another hospital, and lied about being on the consulting staff at New Berlin Memorial Hospital and Northwest General Hospital (Johnson v. Misericordia Community Hospital). Not unlike Dr. Salinsky in the Misericordia case, Dr. Nonesuch was not completely honest when he was applying or being interviewed by Sunshine Hospital, as he failed to disclose that he was transgender by not telling them his sex at birth. At the same time, unlike Misericordia, Dr. Alexander Nonesuch was not being terminated for performance related issues as far as we know. For these reasons, Sunshine Hospital…
Spence case, both parties were in a lawsuit about informed consent. The physician failed to tell the patient of the risks that can happen while going into surgery and any risks that can happen after the surgery. The patient was told of the surgery but did not ask for any additional information. For my personal choice in this case i would find both sides responsible for some of the factors that has happened in the decision making of the physician and the patient. I believe that if the patient has a well grounded mind then the physician should tell them about all the risks for the precare, the surgery itself, and the postoperative care. All of this information can help to save the hospital from a lawsuit. Also, when the patient is presented with an illness that can be helped with an operation they should always do some research about it. This includes being able to ask additional questions and concerns to the…
Shortly after plaintiff Nosrat Khajavi (Khajavi), an anesthesiologist, and defendant, Robert Del Pero, a surgeon, engaged in an altercation over the wisdom of proceeding with a particular surgery, defendant Feather River Anesthesia Medical Group (Feather River) terminated Khajavi’s employment. At trial, the court non-suited Khajavi’s claims that defendants Feather River and Robert Del Pero had discharged him, and conspired to discharge him, in violation of public policy -- that is, in retaliation for advocating “medically appropriate health care” in violation of Business and Professions Code section 2056.…
There are many ethical problems and issues raised by this novel. First of all, the novel put to light Dr. Mathis’s fraud when he realized that he was being framed. How could one view this action? Is it ethically correct to do this? Dr. Mathis was quite certain in having no remorse for doing such a thing, for he believed it did not raise any direct ethical or moral issues. He even believed this did not cause a violation to the Hippocratic Oath. For him, the principle of non-maleficence applied because he could no longer hurt the patient, Mr. Swensen since he was already dead. By doing the fraud, he only corrected an injustice done to him since he was being framed. But, can this be considered enough? By following Kantian ethics and the principles of deontology,…
In accordance with the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act, on April 11, 2011, counsel for Mrs. Christine Stevens the spouse of Steven Stevens, formally notified Hickman Community Hospital and Dr. Whitaker of the impending malpractice allegations in their care and treatment of Mark Stevens (FindLaw, 2013). The formal notice was also accompanied by a medical record release form allowing Mrs. Stevens legal counsel to obtain Mark Stevens medical records, however, the medical record request for was non complaint with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), form failed to denote key information (FindLaw, 2013) . On September…
On July 17, 2003 a California Grand Jury filed an indictment against Barry Weinbaum; Tenet Healthsystem Hospitals, Inc.; and Alvarado Hospital Medical Center, Inc. stating the defendants “did knowingly and intentionally conspire with each other and others… to commit offenses against the United States” by soliciting and receiving remunerations and offering and paying remunerations (US v. Weinbaum, Tenet Healthsystem Hospital Inc. and Alvarado Hospital Medical Center, Inc.).…
Hapless Hospital is concerned about fulfilling its obligations under JCAHO to adequately evaluate applicants for Medical Staff Privileges. Dr. Goody, a board certified surgeon, was appointed by the hospital's credentials committee to be a proctor for (observe) a surgeon who had applied for staff privileges. In accordance with the hospital bylaws, Dr. Goody was asked to observe ten (10) surgeries performed by the applicant and then submit a written report to the credentials committee. The patient in one of those surgeries sued the surgeon and Dr. Goody claiming that the surgeon committed malpractice and Dr. Goody failed to intervene.…
A patient complained to the state medical board that her health care plan physician turned her…
In the case presented for discussion described above, it was imminent that Dr. Yarnell had a justifiable medical history that supported his symptoms. Nonetheless, it can be argued the way PA Brian decided to evaluate and treat Dr. Yarnell was biased or based on personal interests. PA Brian’s medical judgment was compromised. Mutual personal motivations existed between Dr. Yarnell and PA Brian. However, as a clinician PA Brian should have impartially evaluated Dr. Yarnell by properly and examining and documenting his findings or properly redirecting Dr.Yarnell to a different clinician. If the patient (Dr. Yarnell) was never appropriately examined, how can PA Brian as a health care provider substantiate that the medication prescribed was adequate and beneficial for the…
In the given case, the Federal Trade Commission claimed that Texas Surgeons Independent Practice Association(IPA) of 26 general surgeons in the Austin, Texas and six competing medical practice groups who are the members of this association (the respondents), Texas Surgeons P.A. ("Texas Surgeons"), Austin Surgeons, P.L.L.C. ("AS"), Austin Surgical Clinic Association, P.A. ("ASCA"), Bruce McDonald & Associates, P.L.L.C. ("BM&A"), Capital Surgeons Group, P.L.L.C. ("CSG"), Central Texas Surgical Associates, P.A. ("CTSA"), and Surgical Associates of Austin, P.A. ("SAA"), violated Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 45 by engaging in unlawful act of price fixing.…
In addition, the doctor's professional conduct in question, conceal hospital mortality, the guide was covered up cases of medical malpractice.…
Kurtz, Bob. "10 Physician Fraud and Abuse Cases Making Recent Headlines." www.beckersasc.com. Becker 's ASC, 19 July 2010. Web. 1 Nov. 2011.…
Albert Einstein once stated that “Science has been accused of undermining morals – but wrongly. The ethical behaviour of man is better based on sympathy, education, and social relationships, and requires no support from religion. Man’s plight would, indeed, be sad if he had to be kept in order through fear of punishment” (Rowe and Schulmann 233). From genetic modification to stem cell research, ethically controversial science consistently plagues a multitude of media outlets and this consequently results in a negative reputation surrounding the discipline at hand. In H.G. Wells precarious novel The Island of Doctor Moreau, this perspective is portrayed through Dr. Moreau, a brilliant and slightly psychotic scientist who, despite public outcry,…