Caregivers were not aware of the study as it was done in the guise of speech therapy. The study did not have any review of the practices prior to the study being preformed. (George-Walker & Danaher, 2009). After it was conducted peers of Dr. Johnson recommended to not publish the work as it could ruin his career (Erard, 2001). At the time of this study it was common to perform these studies without severe review. However, this does not eliminate the ethical concerns with this study. In addition to the mechanics of how it was performed considering the original questions posed by Mary Tudor in and of itself is unethical as causing or worsening a disability in a child is unethical and would suffered lifelong. This is demonstrated from the response from the children who did speak to the journalist as they describe how their life has overall been impacted (Dryer,
Caregivers were not aware of the study as it was done in the guise of speech therapy. The study did not have any review of the practices prior to the study being preformed. (George-Walker & Danaher, 2009). After it was conducted peers of Dr. Johnson recommended to not publish the work as it could ruin his career (Erard, 2001). At the time of this study it was common to perform these studies without severe review. However, this does not eliminate the ethical concerns with this study. In addition to the mechanics of how it was performed considering the original questions posed by Mary Tudor in and of itself is unethical as causing or worsening a disability in a child is unethical and would suffered lifelong. This is demonstrated from the response from the children who did speak to the journalist as they describe how their life has overall been impacted (Dryer,