Preview

Drone Attacks

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
702 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drone Attacks
Drone Attacks
Inside Pakistan there is ‘national consensus’ on the drones: the US must stop its Predators because they kill innocent citizens in collateral damage and increase the pressure on Pakistan Army fighting the Taliban by swelling the ranks of those who fight it for revenge. Outside Pakistan, there is an impression that the drones are being used against the terrorists in Pakistan’s Tribal Areas under some kind of secret deal between the CIA and Pakistan Army. Another al Qaeda top echelon leader has been killed on January 11 in Miranshah in North Waziristan through this alleged ‘coordination’. This was said to be Abdullah Khorasani, who is believed to have been playing a key role in planning the overall strategy of terror acts in Pakistan.
…show more content…
Following this, a foreign news agency quoted Pakistani officials who said that the drones are being operated under an agreed US-Pakistan plan which remains classified. This clearly contradicts the government’s public stance on this issue, which, quite stridently believes that drones violate Pakistan’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. The American stance in the past has been that drone attacks had to be carried out without bringing Pakistan into the loop because the Pakistani side tended to ‘pass on’ the information about the attack to the terrorists who then moved away from the target area. This was understood all over the world in the light of the belief that Pakistan was actually an allowing safe haven to foreigner terrorists in North Waziristan whom it used for attacking inside Afghanistan to retain its stake in the Afghan endgame. The new ‘information’ — including quotes from unnamed Pakistani officials — belies much of that. It purports to verify that the Pakistani side was indeed keeping the strikes secret and, instead of passing on the information to the terrorists, was actually helping the CIA target them with spotters on the ground. Given the nature of these revelations, it remains to be seen what the Pakistani military’s response will be to …show more content…
The ‘analysis’ about the ‘wiping out’ of al Qaeda and the sharp diminution in its ability to target America and Europe is based on the number of al Qaeda terrorists killed by the drones inside Pakistan. As if to confirm this, a meeting took place between an al Qaeda leader and Mullah Umar in the presence of other commanders in which the al Qaeda representative was quoted as appealing for help for more attacks by allies in Pakistan. Pakistan’s wrath against the CIA after the Raymond Davis case in Lahore early 2011 had brought the US-Pakistan quarrel to a boiling point. Since then, and since the May 2 attack that killed Osama bin Laden, the relationship has been hurtling downhill, ending in Pakistan’s decision not to attend the Bonn conference on Afghanistan. This would then lead to many arguing that with this all as a backdrop, how Pakistan could possibly be cooperating with the US on the drone

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In his book, 7 Deadly Scenerios, Andrew Krepinevich, explores a wide range of non-conventional sources of threat to United States security. Of these, threats he dedicates a chapter to Pakistan’s political and socioeconomic failures. Pakistan, reeling from the assassination of its president on Feb. 24, 2013, faced a week economy, strained relations with India, sectarian conflict, and a fragile democracy. As the government slowly lost its credibility and control on its people, the Loyalist army leaders attempted to impose control and order per their orders. This time they faced a problem – “they had to contend with Islamist elements within the armed forces, led by a clique of young colonels and a few junior generals, who command perhaps a third…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    On September 11, 2001, everything changed. Terrorism had never been seen on such a massive scale. As a result of the massive attacks on U.S. soil, changes had to be enacted. The fight against terror was now a global war effort. The War on Terror was not a popular choice, but it no one expected it to go on for this long. It is now being fought by technology, which led to the drones being used against U.S. citizens suspected of terrorism. The president can authorize these strikes with the claim that these citizens pose an imminent danger to the security of the United States. However, the Obama administration’s definition of imminent threat is vague and without oversight or any checks and balances. There are various military, governmental, and ethical concerns regarding the use of drone strikes ordered by the president. The use of drones is valid, but the administration has not presented any valid defense of their tactics, which paints a poor picture of Oval Office tactical policy.…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    CIA drone strikes have the potential to decimate terrorist organizations in an inexpensive manner and reduces boots on the ground combat for American soldiers. Though, we need expansive and additional congressional oversight of drone strikes and CIA targeting. The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI) is devoted to regulating and reviewing every aspect of the drone program, however, committee members are often met with denial and restriction of information. We need to make sure our drone program is met with regulation and preemptive strikes must be strictly reviewed in a legal manner prior to, in order to prevent the endangerment of innocent civilians, radicalization and mobilization of extremest retaliation, and to preserve the reputation…

    • 117 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    For more than ten years, the west has done its utmost to crush on al Qaeda’s operational competences, which may perhaps have been diminished. The organization’s Taliban protectors were toppled in Afghanistan, and its easily accessible training camps, at one time the destination for jihadist volunteers worldwide, have been dispersed. In addition, al Qaeda attacks in Indonesia, Tunisia, Egypt, Morocco, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Turkey between 2002 and 2006 prompted those governments to attempt to dismantle local terrorist networks. Cooperation among security services and law enforcement organizations worldwide has made its operating environment increasingly hostile (Ashour, 2011). Accordingly, al Qaeda has not been able to carry out a significant terrorist operation in the West since 2005, although its ability of mounting plausible, worrisome threats is not in question.…

    • 2662 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Warfare, enacted by George Bush and expanded on by President Obama to provide a haven for Americans against the terrorist group, al-Qaeda. The use of weaponized unmanned surveillance drones allowed for far better independent targeting decisions, rather than retrieving intelligence from sources within the real country where the warfare would take place. These strategic implications created a question among Americans, is the use of drones to target individuals right? This question has arisen due to a high number of civilian casualties, making it seem inhumane to do. However, Kenneth Anderson provides readers a strong argument as to why drone warfare is strategically effective in his article, “The Case for Drones” with his organization pattern,…

    • 931 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drone Strikes are popular tools of all countries, especially the United States, seeking to neutralize suspected terrorists. Even though the American public is divided on the issue and the Pakistani public, where U.S. drones have been used the most, is sternly against the use of drones, they remain the weapon of choice for our military. This started with the Bush Administration in the early 2000s, the U.S. government has attacked hundreds of targets in northwestern Pakistan alone. Regardless of the moral or ethical questions, drone strikes…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    They soar overhead collect intel and are capable of destroying a whole city! Drones often fly in the sky and you don't even notice them because they seem like regular airplanes,but they are capable of much more than just flying around.These Unmanned Aerial Vehicles spy on you daily. Drones should be illegal because they kill innocent humans, promote terrorism, and are expensive to maintain.…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones In Warfare Essay

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Should drones be used in warfare? It’s necessary to learn about drones—what they are, and how they are used—before determining the answer. The Air Force calls them Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, or simply UVAs. There are dozens of them flying over countries like Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Iraq, providing intelligence and surveillance. Since September 11, 2001, the US has been fighting the “War on Terror”, in which drones are used to kill suspected terrorists. Drones have changed the pattern of warfare and military outcomes.…

    • 715 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drones can cause people to become terrorist. The people becoming terrorist most likely have had a loved one either die or be injured from a drone attack. As Amnesty International said, ”drone strikes can be classified as “war crimes” or illegal “extrajudicial executions.’” (Source K 9) Drones may also not hit the right target either, but drones are not meant to hit each and every target spot on. The people controlling the drones are not perfect and are allowed…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Home Analysis

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Drones are capable of being used by terrorists and other criminals for their bad intentions. For example, in the article “Drone Home” on page 7, Lev Grossman points out the possible security concerns revolving the domestic use of drones.…

    • 738 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Different martial organizations are a hazard to Americans: “Isis and al Qaeda pose an existential threat because they… “provoke domestic and global trends that endanger American values and way of life, and plan direct attacks against the U.S. and its partners” (Kagen et al. 14). Modern technology advances are giving Islamic terrorists an advantage on attacks. Drones are one of the newest military threats towards the United States Military. Because they are small, highly active, and low-cost, they pose the highest military threat. Currently, the United States military is attempting to detect the drones by listening for radio signals; however, because they are silent and programmed to carry out specific missions, it makes them much harder to find. As a matter of fact, “unmanned aircrafts are now ‘sufficiently inexpensive’ that the U.S. military must anticipate [that] some of them may be flown directly into U.S. troops or vehicles as part of an attack” (Lamothe 1). Since remote-control aircrafts are easy for anyone to lay their hands on, it can be difficult…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    These machines destroy many enemy camps that contain the Al-Qaeda in places such as Somalia and Afghanistan. Drones also “have done so at little financial cost, at no risk to U.S. forces, and with fewer civilian casualties than many alternative methods would have caused.” (Byman). In the face of the riots all around the nation, Obama has called the reduction in America’s reliance to these machines even though they will still remain the government’s main weapon of choice for international warfare. These machines have done the task of killing the main leaders of the terrorist organization that has haunted us for many years and have denied the life of many of their sanctuaries. Knowing that this information was spread around the world, the citizens of America became more accepting of keeping the production of this new technology alive and to make it as strong as ever. Although it has not been the most approved program the military could use, the biggest advantage is that it actually works and it is the most efficient program for terminating enemy troops that the military has ever invested billions of dollars for. Many politicians and regular civilians “think it fair to say that the targeted killing program has been the most precise and effective application of firepower in the history of armed conflict.” (Hayden). From this quote, the reality of war has brought upon the competition of seeing which country’s military can create the strongest weapon possible. Since Al-Qaeda has started the War on Terrorism with America, Obama and the government have worked for many months on created these drones to help reduce the risk of terrorists towards the civilians. According to Michael Lewis, Drones used for war is actually the most humane forms of warfare that could…

    • 1870 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Benefits of Drones

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages

    B. According to Harvard Political Review, With the money saved by switching to drones from manned aircraft, America can strengthen the economy…

    • 292 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone Usage in America

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drone use within the United Stated of America has been a very controversial topic of the recent times; therefore, this article is being written to say why drone usage has become so controversial in our country, and all over the world.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Drone warfare is basically a loophole around international laws and policies. “Basic categories such as 'battlefield,' 'combatant,' and 'hostilities' no longer have a clear or stable meaning”(Stimson Center). We don't have a clear meaning to combat since the drone warfare has started. Although the American use of drones for targeted killing may be legal, the pervasive use of drones threatens the rule of law. President Obama stated at the National Defense University that "America's legitimate claim of self-defense cannot be the end of the discussion. To say a military tactic is legal, or even effective, is not to say it is wise or moral in every instance. For the same human progress that gives us the technology to strike half a world away also demands the discipline to constrain that power--or risk abusing it"(Benjamin).The majority of U.S. drone strikes have been made in secrecy and usually parts of the world that have minimal accessibility to journalist and human-rights. Even though drones can help there has been a lot of negative effects because of…

    • 1014 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays