In summary, a drone is the impedimenta, presenting terrorist hunts and heart-stopping sceneries for most people. Notwithstanding, the up-to-date applications now extend to carrying out environmental duty and permanent baseline data at one third of the cost …show more content…
As said from the second paragraph of the fifth table of contents, “With the advance of technology and the mass production of these low-cost devices, what would stop terrorists from acquiring and using them? Drones are appealing to the extremist mind. They're small, hard to detect, can fly low or high, can be controlled from across the world or within eyesight, and can fly into the busiest city or into the most wild and remote of places.” This implies that drones do have a negative side to its supposedly good intentions. Consequently, drones could be used for invading people’s privacy. What if out of a sudden, one dropped and landed on an animal or a person? The consequences are simply inexplicable. They could surely be deliberated as weapons than they could as advanced technology. Such expertise in the wrong hands could cause a fiasco. In contrast, from the eighth paragraph of the second table of contents, “Research has introduced the use of a range of aerial platforms and an innovative application of thermography which can observe, document, and assist authorities in detecting illegal activities” says the author. It can be inferred that drones have a positive side as well. To elaborate, drones have been replanting our forests for ages, all the impetuousness to the environment drones can help mend and restore back. In addition, these machineries are as a new method of photography, contributing points of view on our neighborhoods, our news event, our cities and our natural environment. They will probably be able to make new kinds of maps as well. With that, I presume that it solely depends on everyone on how they look at a drone’s capabilities. As for me, it equally has both negative and positive