With this, dangerous, expensive shots can instead be filmed at a fraction of the price, in a fraction of the time, and with much improved safety (in many cases). However, using drones isn't exactly a perfect solution. For one, their battery life is significantly shorter than the fuel range of a traditional aircraft, and their controls can sometimes be pretty finicky (which we all found out when flying on Tuesday). As a result of this, shots over crowds (which are mostly illegal as is) and shots over open water would be much more risky to use a drone. In addition, while you can put very good cameras on drones, it is doubtful that the absolute highest quality cameras, as well as 3-D cameras, could be fitted to drones, so it is possible that drone shots, especially when projected in theaters, may have slightly lower quality than the rest of the movie. However, for lower budget works, using drones is a slam-dunk no-brainer move in my opinion, if you can get clearance to do so
With this, dangerous, expensive shots can instead be filmed at a fraction of the price, in a fraction of the time, and with much improved safety (in many cases). However, using drones isn't exactly a perfect solution. For one, their battery life is significantly shorter than the fuel range of a traditional aircraft, and their controls can sometimes be pretty finicky (which we all found out when flying on Tuesday). As a result of this, shots over crowds (which are mostly illegal as is) and shots over open water would be much more risky to use a drone. In addition, while you can put very good cameras on drones, it is doubtful that the absolute highest quality cameras, as well as 3-D cameras, could be fitted to drones, so it is possible that drone shots, especially when projected in theaters, may have slightly lower quality than the rest of the movie. However, for lower budget works, using drones is a slam-dunk no-brainer move in my opinion, if you can get clearance to do so