Preview

Drug Testing and Ethics

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2040 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Drug Testing and Ethics
Camille Dickinson
Business Ethics
Module 5
November 27th 2010

Is drug testing an unwarranted invasion of employee privacy? Which is more important--getting drugs out of the workplace or protecting the privacy of the employee?
What about other health-threatening activities, i.e. smoking outside of working hours, unprotected sex, etc. Should employers be able to question or test employees or potential employees about these activities?
Both of these scenarios are tricky ones. On the one hand, any employer would want to get drugs out of the workplace. On the other hand you don’t want to invade an employee’s privacy. At the same time some jobs may require employees to conform to a certain standard of behavior both on and off the job, but how much is too much? How much should be employees be judged and how high of a standard should be set. Where do we draw the line?
Shaw and Barry in their text Moral Issues in Business state “A firm has a legitimate interest in employee conduct off the job only if it affects work performance” (Shaw & Barry 2010, p477). It can be argued that as long as the drug use doesn’t affect the employee’s work performance, then he shouldn’t be tested. If he is tested and the result is positive, but work performance is satisfactory, then drug use should not be considered as grounds for termination. Perhaps a better way to state this could be that as long as employee performance meets or exceeds the expected standards, then drug testing should not be used even if drug use is suspected.
Egoism can be used to argue from both points of view. According to this theory, “an act is morally right if and only if it best promotes an agent’s interests” (Shaw & Barry, 2010 p59). Following this theory, if the employer drug tests several employees and fires all who test positive, then they are acting in their best interests. On the other hand, if the employee’s best interests are served through their drug usage, then the employee has acted in

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    At no time should any employee be in possession or under the influence of drugs or alcohol. All employees and company members will be subject to pre-employment drug testing. This will require random drug screenings throughout the year.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pre-employment drug testing and post hiring random testing has become common place in today’s business world. In order to ensure that their employees can function safely for the good of themselves, fellow employees and the company property, companies have adopted the practice of drug testing employees.…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Testing Case Summary

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Another case that addresses drug testing is Aubrey v. School Board of Lafayette Parish (1998). In this case we are looking at the Fourth Amendment rights of employees. Aubrey was a custodian at an elementary school. In December 1992 the board adopted an Employee Drug Testing Policy stating all "safety sensitive" employees are subject to random selection and drug testing each year. In August of 1993, Aubrey attended and in-service where the y policy was dispersed and reviewed. On September 28, 1994, Aubrey and fourteen other employees undergo drug testing through urinalysis screening. Aubrey tested positive for a chemical that is known to be found in marijuana. In lieu of termination, the Board recommended that Aubrey attend a substance abuse program.…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    As children, many people are introduced to the famous quote by late National Football League coach, Vince Lombardi, which is "winning isn 't everything; it 's the only thing" (Voy 204). Sports have always been about winning; however, some professional and amateur athletes take this simple saying too literally and it changes their outlook on their profession. As high school and even middle school athletes, they start to take drugs in order to be accepted, or to better their performance on the playing field (Louria n.pag). Once theses athletes reach the college level; they experiment, and are surrounded by even more drugs in order to get any advantage. It is not fair that one athlete can work hard in order to improve his performance, but then have another athlete improve more than him due to being wired on cocaine or bulked up on steroids. Also, Robert Voy states that drug use today is the biggest threat to the Olympics ideal, thus the Olympics and many other professional organizations are turning to drug testing. Testing is a huge controversy today because many believe that it violates one 's right of privacy; however, if there is no testing, many athletes will continue to have an unfair advantage to non drug users (180). Furthermore, it injures the user because it will result in mood changes, and it will hurt their health, if not immediately, then it will later on in their life. The chance of being caught using drugs is so small compared to the achievements one will have while using drugs which is so vast. No athlete should have an unfair advantage, these advantages only promote drug use, which many athletes believe it is a necessary means in today 's time. The only way to have the use of drugs decrease is to have mandatory drug testing across the board for all athletes.…

    • 2701 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Egoism—specifically ethical egoism—argues that our moral evaluations should be made in terms of our desires and goals. Something that promotes what I want is regarded as right; something that interferes with what I want, or prevents me from reaching my goals, is regarded as wrong.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    It is important that we strive to maintain a safe and effective work environment for every single one of our employees. It is estimated that workplace accidents related to drugs have costs employers in the United States $75 to 100 billion dollars per year. Those who abuse are also six times more likely to file worker’s compensation claim and use 16 times the amount of health benefits as their fellow employees who do not use drugs. (http://www.employmentdrugtesting.com/screening.html_) Not ensuring that our employees are drug-free could end up costing our company a great deal of money in the long run if an employee under the influence injures themself or another employee while on the job here at Life Support, Inc.…

    • 560 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In 1986, former President Ronald Reagan signed Executive Order 12564, which requires all federal employees to avoid using illegal drugs, whether on or off-duty, as a condition for federal employment. In 1988, Congress passed the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, which, in turn, initiated the creation of federal Mandatory Guidelines for Federal Workplace Drug Testing Programs (Section 503 of Public Law 100-71). The mandatory guidelines apply to the uniformed services, contractors or service providers under contract with the federal government, and to executive agencies of the federal government. Even though the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988 applies to federal employees, state and local governments followed along and adopted similar programs under state laws and drug-free workplace programs (Drug testing, 2011).…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal foundation for suspicionless student drug testing rests upon Vernonia v. Acton (1995). In that landmark decision, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a school policy requiring student athletes to pass random urinalysis tests as a ground for participation in interscholastic sports. The Court rejected a Fourth Amendment claim asserting that such tests are an unconstitutional invasion of privacy. Closely watched nationwide, the decision effectively opened the door for school districts to institute similar policies of their own.…

    • 658 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In most companies, the use of drugs especially during work hours or being under the influence of drugs or alcohol while at work is a company policy violation. The violation can lead to immediate termination in an organization. The organization has the responsibility to reasonably protect its employees including from those under the influence of drugs. A reasonable accommodation would be to rehire the employee once the employee has been through rehab and is completely rehabilitated. Once the employee has been rehabilitated, the employee is then covered under the ADA. According to the Center for Psychiatric Rehabilitation, "The ADA also covers past history of alcoholism and drug abuse if the person is no longer currently using illegal substances. Alcoholism is covered as a disability if a person is still abusing alcohol, although it does not prohibit an employer from taking disciplinary action for unsatisfactory performance or failure to comply with company policy" (Boston University, 2010, p.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The legal roots of mandatory drug testing are found in the common law doctrine of "employment at will." That doctrine states that either party to an employment contract can terminate the contract for any reason, at any time, unless the contract specifies otherwise. As the Court held in Adair v. United States (208 U.S. 161, 175-6, 1908), the employer "was at liberty, in his discretion,…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Another point against mandatory drug testing is the issue of costs for either the necessary equipment or tools to test each employee. The argument against this is that the total cost for each test is outweighed by the possibility of a lawsuit or legal ramifications from another individual or party who was harmed or wronged by an employee while they were under the influence of either alcohol or another substance due to the absence of mandatory drug testing. Arguments against mandatory drug testing states the possibility of false positives in the results of drug tests. This is a valid point in that the purpose of mandatory drug testing is remove those under the influence and are impaired from their responsibility and at the same time, keep other members of society from harm. To counter that argument, the punishment for testing positive would be an immediate removal from the position but not a dismissal from their employment and to undergo additional testing to determine if the original positive result was the product of a false positive or an indication of use while in their respective…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    All major companies and corporation requires drug test before and after one hired. A person has to prove their innocence even if there is no suspicion of guilt. One is now guilty of drug abuse and is required to prove their innocence; this indeed is contrary to ones rights granted by the “innocent until proven guilty” principle of U.S justice.…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Workplace Drug Screening

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The author will explain the different types of drug testing, the reliability of these tests, drug testing programs and the ethical and legal issues of workplace drug testing.…

    • 1301 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Workplace Drug Testing

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Drug testing within the workplace has become a common practice over the past three decades. While employers continue to focus on eliminating the risks that are associated with drug use from their workplace many other areas are just realizing that drug testing is important. One such area is through workforce development and training. Focusing solely on Indiana, drug testing was implemented for all new individuals who were enrolled in training provided by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 on July 1, 2011. Individuals receiving this training were now subject to drug testing prior to starting the training process.…

    • 1714 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Drug Testing In Sports

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page

    Many people have their own opinion on drug testing. Some may agree with it and some may not. Drug testing in sports appear in all sports and in any level of competition. Drug testing in sports seems to be a very popular controversial topic to discuss today. The following reasons will be what is discussed about this topic. Most people may wonder about the history of drug testing in sports, the different kinds of performance enhancing drugs that athletes use and some side effects, also the reason drug testing in sports should be required or why it is even considered. The use of performance enhancing drugs in sports has continued to evolve and has gradually advanced over time and increased. Many athletes turn to the use performance enhancing drugs…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics