Proposal to Drug Test Welfare Recipients
There are approximately 30 million Americans on some sort of welfare right now. In 2010, the United States Federal Government spent $0.8 trillion toward welfare. The amount spent on welfare in 2010 is one of the top expenses, money spent on defense and healthcare were the highest expenses, but welfare was third (Chantrill, Christopher). The main purpose of an economic welfare system is to assist citizens who are not able to support themselves or their families due to unemployment, underemployment, hardship, unskilled labor capacity, disability, or other similar reasons. So why are there some many Americans that solely rely on welfare benefits? Welfare recipients should be drug tested. Testing for drugs among welfare recipients would save the US Government millions of dollars, it would help many Americans overcome their illegal drug habits, and taxpayer’s money would not support somebody’s illegal drug use.
Not all welfare recipients use illegal drug. Actually, statistics show that the use of illegal drugs is slightly higher among unassisted families than assisted families. “The prevalence among persons in assisted families (9.6 percent) is higher than among persons in families receiving government assistance (6.8 percent)” (NHSDA). The problem is not who is using drug but that welfare recipients should not be given money from the government to pay for their drug addiction. People with history of drug convictions or drug history should be drug tested before receiving welfare benefits. Drug testing welfare recipients would save the United States Government because welfare recipients that submit a faulty drug test would be cut off from benefits for a year, saving the government money. One drug test cost from $10.00 - $50.00. Yes, that can add up, but it is better than the government spending on average $44,400 per year for a low income family of four (Rector, Robert, Katherine Bradley, and Rachel Sheffield). Also every person is not going to be drug tested immediately, it can be random, which will result in more saving. Drug testing welfare recipients would save money and unnecessary government spending.
Another benefit of drug testing people receiving welfare, is it would stop some Americans from using illegal drugs. Illegal drug use in America is on the rise over the last couple of years and without testing welfare recipients, America is supporting this rise. Drug testing welfare recipients would not stop everyone on welfare from using illegal drugs but it would help some. Illegal drug use has many harmful effects, not on the person using them also on their family and friends. People on drugs are not prepared to get a job, therefore they will always be dependent on the welfare system. This is not the reason the welfare system was created, it was made to help for a short period of time. Drug testing welfare recipients will result in many Americans “kicking” their drug habits in which will eventually lead to job ready citizens. Drug testing people on welfare is not to cause hardship, but to help create better citizens.
The last reason that welfare recipients should be drug tested is taxpayer’s money should not be given to somebody to use illegal drugs. Most working people in America have to submit to drug test at their place of employment. Many working Americans have to submit a drug test to get a job and then agree to random drug testing to keep their jobs. The working Americans, pay their taxes, in which is where the government ultimately receives their money to pay for welfare. Why should people who have to work for their money have to submit to a drug test, but welfare recipients, who sit back and collect do not have to stay drug free? Welfare recipients should have to submit a clean drug test to even receive these benefits just as working Americans do.
There are people that oppose drug testing welfare recipients. The main reason people oppose this idea is because they think it will not save the US Government money. As discussed before, the government would save money. One low income family of four would save the government $44,400. That adds up faster than the money spent on the drug test itself. Another opposing reason is, some people think it is against the 4th Amendment. The 4th Amendment- search and seizure, drug testing welfare recipients is not against this amendment because it is your choice to sign up for welfare benefits. If one does not like the rules to receiving welfare then they don’t have to sign up for benefits. Not to make it cut and dry but “beggars can't be choosers”.
In conclusion, drug testing welfare recipients would ultimately benefit America as a nation. Drug testing would save the government money, or allow money to be spent elsewhere like education. Drug testing welfare recipients would also help many citizens get off drugs, so they can keep their benefits and also make them better prepared to get off the system and into employment. Taxpayers would also be satisfied by this proposal because they would know that their money is going to more efficient spending and the money is not supporting somebody’s drug habit. Drug testing welfare recipients has many benefits and little disadvantages.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Whether or not a drug test is required by recipients of welfare has been questioned time and time again by many states. In the article "No drug test, no welfare", Kimberly Yee expands upon on this question by explaining what her stand point is on the many advantages of drug testing for welfare. In this particular article, Ms. Yee does not sufficiently argue her position on the subject of welfare recipients taking drug test to receive benefits.…
- 527 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Ok, let's all look at this as realistically as we can; if just 1 person failed a drug test for the welfare, that's a whole extra few hundred dollars per month that our government can save, and that's only for 1 person! A typical drug test cost around $10 for the cheaper ones. That's store price too, that's not considering what government contracter bulk…
- 501 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
Florida Governor Rick Scott made plans to test all welfare recipients to see if they are using drugs before they can receive payments is hardly saving the state any money, according to recent reports. At $30 per test, the state paid $28,800 in drug test reimbursements (960 reimbursements at $30 each, since about 2 percent also didn’t finish the application process) for those who did pass, while saving themselves about $66,000 in payments that did not have to be made for the year to those applicants that didn’t make it through for one reason or another (applicants receive $138 a month, or $1,656 per year).…
- 493 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Isn't it ironic in our society today, that individuals are administered drug testing if they want to bring home a paycheck in efforts to provide a roof over their head, clothes on their back, and food in their mouth? At the same time it's not required by another individual who is requesting government assistance in their efforts to receive the exact same things? You could argue that the individuals applying for those jobs are not personally obligated in any way to subject themselves to undergo any drug-testing. However, those same individuals would likely be overlooked for any consideration of employment due to failure of meeting the companies drug-free policy. So why aren't welfare recipients required to undergo drug-testing in order to receive any government assistance?…
- 498 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
According to Points of View Reference Center, Florida’s mandatory drug testing program cost the state more than one hundred and eighteen thousand dollars, which was forty thousand dollars more than they would have gave to welfare recipients (View). In this case mandatory drug testing are useless because it will be a waste of money. The second part of this position will be if the recipient does fail a drug test he/she and family will no longer receive government aid. Which may result in the ex-recipient to act in illegal activities to provide for their…
- 796 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Florida's drug use prerequisite extended demonstrated that welfare beneficiaries who utilized illicit drugs had income that was 30 percent lower than the individuals who did not…
- 761 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Walters brings up arguments from both a favoring side and an opposing side. Favoring sides would not want to give someone government benefits if they are using the benefits to support a drug habit and could save the government money by denying applicants. The opposing side feels that drug testing would come to a great expense to the government and rather than drug testing an individual who needs help because of their drug addiction other programs such as rehab would save money to local, state and federal governments. The author feels that both are good arguments.…
- 566 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The definition makes welfare sound easy, but there are many loop holes in the system that many people take advantage of. With over 40 million Americans receiving food stamps and 50 percent of households relying on government assistance, the system is doomed to fail if there is not a change. Hard working Americans will not be able to much longer provide what many receiving assistance have grown accustomed to. Throughout the course of American history welfare has been “reformed” many times to only cause problems later in the future. The idea of welfare was formed with great intentions, but it has spiraled out of control. Many people take advantage of the tax dollars that people work hard for. Some Americans spend their government check on drugs. They simply sale their food stamp card for extra cash to buy unnecessary things. The author of “Welfare Programs Should Include Mandatory Drug Testing” shares a personal experience and states, ‘Growing up, my mother was a recipient who abused the welfare system. I remember having no heat or electricity and being so hungry it was painful. My siblings and I would fist fight over food. She would trade her food stamp card for various things like cash, cigarettes and an occasional joint. She just wouldn 't help herself, and we were the kids that no one…
- 1145 Words
- 5 Pages
Better Essays -
There is much debate regarding this issue. Supporters of requiring drug tests for welfare applicants believe that there will be many people deterred from applying due to knowing they will not pass. They also believe that some will fail the drug tests. These supporters believe this number of people will be so large that there will be a significant decrease in welfare spending. Other supporters have said “substance abuse is a prominent barrier preventing people from making the necessary transition from governmental dependence to self-reliance.”(Targeted News Service) Opponents have said this is a direct violation of our constitutional rights as American citizens. Some have even said it is not right to assume that just because people are poor, they drug users. Other opposers of welfare drug testing have argued that it will not save money at…
- 1822 Words
- 8 Pages
Powerful Essays -
People who receive welfare should get drug tested just like most taxpayers have to. Some people for instance, nurses, have to be drug tested in order to keep their job. The same should apply to all people that wish to receive a helping hand. There shouldn’t be a controversy between drug testing people if the drugs are illegal to do. The reason why we would have to think about drug testing people is because there is a problem with the system. This would be a way of really fixing people instead of…
- 553 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Drug testing has its pros and cons. One pro is that it would immediately take off any drug users who could use the money for drugs or other illegal substances; adding to that, it would give people the motivation to stay off drugs for themselves and their families if they want to still receive government benefits. Some people look at it like, if people are getting jobs have to get drug tested, why don’t the people receiving welfare have to?”(HRF, 2014). One of the cons for drug testing is that people feel like it is discrimination against the poor. The poor believe that higher up people who are considered rich aren’t required to take a drug test (HRF,…
- 1965 Words
- 8 Pages
Better Essays -
We live in an age of laziness, and by that I mean people take the easy way out more often than they should. Now that being said, finding the easy way to do something is not always a bad thing. The case of Americans fraudulently receiving welfare checks is an example of the laziness I am discussing. As a society, we need to make this accepted practice an unaccepted practice. We need to stand up and make the process of applying and receiving these benefits more stringent than they currently are. I believe through use of mandatory random drug testing, progress monitoring, on- going physical and mental examinations, we can discourage the continued misuse of these funds.…
- 704 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Drug testing welfare recipients has been a major topic across the United States for a few years now. Many argue that if working class people are subject to a test prior to hire or randomly during the length of employment, why should those that don’t have to work for money not have the same treatment? Invasion of privacy is a huge disadvantage on the government’s part, yes it is free money but that doesn’t entitle anyone, even government, to control every aspect of your life or hold it constantly over a person’s head until they feel guilt or just flat decline assistance. Let’s ask ourselves just one question; if you went to the bank for a car loan, being this is a necessity for everyday living to own, how would you feel if they asked you to take a drug test prior to lending you the money? I feel many peoples’ tune would change drastically.…
- 1433 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays -
Should people who want welfare be required to take a drug test? People say the fourth amendment protects them because it states “ unreasonable searches and seizures.” Welfare drug testing is a common way to make sure taxpayer dollars are used responsibly. People who have to pay for other people’s welfare because they can go into work disagree with people who even have to think twice about drug testing being required to receive welfare. Taxpayers who pay on welfare think the government is responsible to make sure that their money is being used correctly and to make sure that drug users don’t receive any funds from the state. Why should we support their drug use, if you want drugs you should be able to pay for your own needs. We shouldn’t support basically feeding into their drugs use and letting them slowly kill themselves. Instead we should provide rehabs and hospital treatments. We don’t need to lock the addict up we need to get them help because they’re cable of so much more than what their setting their mindset do. They’re putting a limit to their goals and success in life. You can do…
- 1019 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
The United States welfare system is corrupt. This problem is known by taxpayers all too well. Welfare is a very helpful system to those less fortunate; however, it has been directed away from what its original purpose was and is now available to most anyone. Too many individuals take the benefits given to them and unfairly use them. If certain regulations were to be set in place, many abusers of the system would stop taking advantage. Drug testing should be required in order to receive welfare benefits because drug testing would aid in stopping drug use, because able-bodied recipients would be pushed to look for jobs, and because most working citizens are required to take drug tests in order to work.…
- 748 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays