Preview

Durkhiem

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
5167 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Durkhiem
Durkheim- Social Stratification

Emile Durkheim was a French sociologist who had a profound influence on the development of sociology. He, in turn, was greatly influenced by Auguste Comte.
Among Durkheim’s first significant works was the division of labour in society, and this is what will be discussed throughout this paper. A critique of the stratification in Durkheim’s “forced division of labour” will be provided near the end.
In Book 1, Durkheim’s main argument is that there are two types of solidarities. The two solidarities Durkheim discussed are mechanical and organic solidarity. Mechanical solidarity refers to the division of labour in the early stages, which can be described as a remarkably primitive society. Organic solidarity refers to the contemporary stages of society wherein there is a well-developed division of labour. Durkheim said that as one society changes, the other breaks down and makes way for the new.
In Book 1, Durkheim defined division of labour; he explained it as “increasing both production capacity and skill of the workman as it is necessary for the intellectual and material development of societies” (Durkheim 12). Durkheim went on to argue that if society were nothing but an economic function, people would have no morality and no reason for existence (Durkheim 15). He also believed that the economic system is insignificant compared to morality because in order to have solidarity, morality must be felt between two or more people. Morality, he said, gives rise to friendships and makes a mark on them. For instance, Friend A falls ill. Friend B feels a connection with Friend A, so he believes it is morally right to take on his roles for the day so Friend A can go home and rest (Durkheim 17).
In the book, marriage was used as an example to show how the division of labour contributes to feelings of solidarity. According to Durkheim, the division of labour is not just economics, but goes beyond that interest constituted



Cited: Coser, Lewis A.. Durkhiem the division of labour in society . New York: The Free Press, 1984. Print. Levine, Chuck. "Durkheim- Forced division of labour." Western University. Western University. Western University, London. 28 Feb. 2013. Lecture. "SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY." The Society for Social Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Mar. 2013. "Sociology 250 - Notes on Durkheim." University of Regina, personal web server. N.p., n.d. Web. 3 Mar. 2013.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    One of Durkheim’s major works was a Book called ‘The division of labor in society’. This is known as one of his most famous books, as it includes some key elements of his sociological thoughts. In this book, Durkheim wrote about the differences within traditional and modern societies. He describes traditional societies as having a low division of labor in society- resulting in mechanical solidarity. This is a term that Durkheim used to explain small compact and quite simple societies such as small rural villages, where there was a strong…

    • 1548 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Émile Durkheim (1858 – 1917) was also a sociologist, social psychologist and philosopher like Mead, except, unlike Mead, he was French. His three major works include “The Division of Labor” (1893), “Suicide” (1897), and “The Elementary Forms of Religious Life” (1912) and he believed that they all explained a social phenomena. Durkheim’s theories were based on things that were external in nature as opposed to those that were internal in nature. The division of labor occurred when social organization shifted from being traditional (Mechanical Solidarity) to modern (Organic Solidarity). In the olden days, people were self-sufficient, feeding themselves and their families, bounded by similarities in religions, values, societal norms, occupations, backgrounds,… However, in the modern…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. According to Durkheim, what are the primary causes of the division of labor in general?…

    • 287 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Durkheim’s view, modern societies the rules governing behaviour become weaker and less clear-cut. This is because modern societies have a complex, specialised division of labour, which leads to individuals increasingly different from one another. This means that the shared culture or collective conscience is weakened, and this results in higher levels of crime and deviance…

    • 1074 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    1) Estrangement of the worker from his product; Workers suffer from being ‘alienated’, and impoverishment due to the political economy of private ownership, society is divided into classes. “Political economy does not disclose the source of the division between labour and capital, and between capital and land” (p. 32).…

    • 2988 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    This created a disparity between the rich and the working poor. This stage in society separation, known as socialism and marked by unequal pay for the work performed, is the intermediate stage between capitalism and communism, according to German philosopher and revolutionary socialist Karl Marx’s theory “The Communist Manifest”. (“Karl Marx” 2011) Marx described Communism “as a society in which each person should contribute according to their ability and receive according to their need”. (“Karl Marx” 2011)…

    • 721 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Individual grows as parts of society, and the society grows with the individual. The society becomes more efficient. The division of labor is necessary to make society work at its best potential. Durkheim saw the society as functioning and not in…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Bibliography: 1. Bellah, Robert N. 1973. Emile Durkheim: On Morality and Society, Selected Writings. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.…

    • 2133 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    The ‘father of academic sociology’ (Hopkins Burke, 2006), Emile Durkheim believed that crime was an important necessity in every society as it played important functional roles in the maintenance of social cohesion, the continuity of social progress and the establishment and reinforcement of societal norms. He stated that criminality was a normal phenomenon, its influence prevalent even on the most saintly of societies. Durkheim’s theories regarding the normality and inevitability of crime, along with his influential concepts of anomie, the division of labour and mechanical and organic solidarity, had a lasting effect on the field of criminological study, particularly in subsequent research conducted by fellow populist theorists of the Chicago School.…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Sociology and Answer

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages

    | French sociologist Emile Durkheim observed that rapid social change and a more specialized division of labor produce strain in society; these strains lead to a breakdown in traditional organization, values, and authority and to a dramatic increase in:…

    • 2095 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collins Dictionary of Sociology, p406 adapted from S. Lukes, Emile Durkheim: His life and Work (1973) London:Allen Lane Museum of Natural History…

    • 898 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Emile Durkheim was a French theorist who wanted to create an ideal of sociology based on the idea that society is an unbiased and limiting material reality, independent to the individual. According to Durkheim, the division of labor is basically a significant source of social solidarity dating back to the foundation of life that links together and affects civil, economic, educational, and legal processes. This new…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Economic and Philosophical Manuscripts of 1844 is a compilation of thoughts regarding German economic and political concerns. Karl Marx conceives capitalist society’s responsible for the estrangement of the laborer. The capitalist mode of production ensures that man’s labor necessarily restricts him from acting in accordance with his humanity. The theory of capitalism diverts him, in the sense that it provides false hope for betterment, while the structure of capitalism, in coercing him to fluctuate his priorities away from that of an autonomous social being towards that of a collective individual, debases man’s special bond to his species- what is self-contradictory is it asks him to abandon his deepest bond to humanity, while at the same time offering him the hope of becoming a better social being. As a result of this contradiction, Marx affirm, man’s labor alienates him from himself and from his species. Yet I am here to argue, although man may feel alienated from himself and product of work, man has the choice, option to free himself from notions of capital enslavement. Within this essay, I will define estrangement of labor and the four main dimensions of alienation, evident in a capitalist society. I will discuss how alienated labor comes about as a result of capitalism and why said labor is not socially commend. Furthermore, I will elucidate on what non-alienated labor would be like, compared to alienated labor, in a capitalist society. Ultimately, I will annotate why Marx’s critique of capitalism is unfound and how labor under capitalism is in fact, engaging.…

    • 1446 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    * When someone can't reach high goals (e.g. American Dream; Big house, two cars etc…)…

    • 322 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When discussing the self, Durkheim places heavy emphasis on solidarity as to what holds individuals together in social institutions. Roles and institutions are similar to bodily organs, as they are dependent on one another (McDonell, 2012). He refers to two types of solidarity, mechanical and organic, where each produces different individuals in society (Shortell, n.d.). Mechanical solidarity is concerned with undifferentiated social structure with little division of labour. These societies were generally rural, religious, authoritarian and had constraints on social facts and little social mobility. Organic solidarity is…

    • 1373 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays

Related Topics