MacKinnon argues that pornography should be banned in order to help women become socially equal to men. Her logic is that since men see the visual subordination of women, in the form of rape, sexual harassment, and abuse, they will go on to commit these acts against women in reality. Abuse against women is common because of the numerous media by which pornography is transmitted. This commonness that pornography is now being attributed to is seen as its destructiveness in that it means that courts no longer have the ability to distinguish artwork and pornography. Not to so say that MacKinnon gives no evidence of its prevalence, she does so in her analogy between adult pornography and child pornography. Child pornography is regulated by law and is banned because it portrays sexual acts with children, which may cause them mental harm, and many of the children in these acts are harassed and abused. MacKinnon says that child pornography is banned
References: 1. Dyzenhaus, David, and Arthur Ripstein. Law and Morality. 2nd ed. Toronto: University of Toronto P, 2003. 2. FindLaw: For Legal Professionals. "U.S. Constitution: First Amendment". (http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data/constitution/amendment01/)