Economics: Good Choice of Major for Future CEOs
Economics: Good Choice of Major for Future CEOs
By Patricia M. Flynn and Michael A. Quinn* Abstract It is often suggested that Economics is a good major for individuals interested in becoming business leaders. Despite this widespread assertion, little research has been conducted on this topic. Using the Standard and Poor (S&P) 500 companies, this paper examines the validity of such a claim. We find evidence that Economics is a good choice of major for those aspiring to become a CEO. Economics ranked third with 9% of the CEOs of the S&P 500 companies in 2004 being undergraduate Economics majors, behind Business Administration and Engineering majors, each of which accounted for 20% of the CEOs. When adjusting for size of the pool of graduates, those with undergraduate degrees in Economics are shown to have had a greater likelihood of becoming an S&P 500 CEO than any other major. That is, the share of graduates who were Economics majors who were CEOs in 2004 was greater than that for any other major, including Business Administration and Engineering. The findings also show that a higher percentage of CEOs who were Economics majors subsequently completed a graduate degree – often an MBA -- than did their counterparts with Business Administration and Engineering degrees. The paper demonstrates that while women now comprise over half of all bachelors and masters degrees awarded, they remain a minority in terms of undergraduate degrees awarded in Economics and in MBA degrees conferred. Economics programs may try to appeal to more women students as a stepping stone to becoming a CEO, especially as women continue to account for less than 2 percent of the S&P 500 CEOs. Keywords: undergraduate major, CEO, economics degrees, gender mix of students JEL: A2 I. Introduction In discussing whether to major in economics as an undergraduate, the Princeton Review writes that “a thorough working knowledge of how Economics shapes businesses is necessary if you’re going to become a CEO
By Patricia M. Flynn and Michael A. Quinn* Abstract It is often suggested that Economics is a good major for individuals interested in becoming business leaders. Despite this widespread assertion, little research has been conducted on this topic. Using the Standard and Poor (S&P) 500 companies, this paper examines the validity of such a claim. We find evidence that Economics is a good choice of major for those aspiring to become a CEO. Economics ranked third with 9% of the CEOs of the S&P 500 companies in 2004 being undergraduate Economics majors, behind Business Administration and Engineering majors, each of which accounted for 20% of the CEOs. When adjusting for size of the pool of graduates, those with undergraduate degrees in Economics are shown to have had a greater likelihood of becoming an S&P 500 CEO than any other major. That is, the share of graduates who were Economics majors who were CEOs in 2004 was greater than that for any other major, including Business Administration and Engineering. The findings also show that a higher percentage of CEOs who were Economics majors subsequently completed a graduate degree – often an MBA -- than did their counterparts with Business Administration and Engineering degrees. The paper demonstrates that while women now comprise over half of all bachelors and masters degrees awarded, they remain a minority in terms of undergraduate degrees awarded in Economics and in MBA degrees conferred. Economics programs may try to appeal to more women students as a stepping stone to becoming a CEO, especially as women continue to account for less than 2 percent of the S&P 500 CEOs. Keywords: undergraduate major, CEO, economics degrees, gender mix of students JEL: A2 I. Introduction In discussing whether to major in economics as an undergraduate, the Princeton Review writes that “a thorough working knowledge of how Economics shapes businesses is necessary if you’re going to become a CEO
References: Anderson, K.H., and J.J. Siegfried, 1997. Gender differences in rating the teaching of economics. Eastern Economic Journal. 18(3):91-95. Ashworth, John and J. Lynne Evans. 2001. Modeling student subject choice at secondary and tertiary level: A cross-section study. Journal of Economic Education. 32(4): 311-320. Astin, Alexander W., Leticia Oseguera, Linda J. Sax, and William S. Korn. 2002. The American Freshman: Thirty-Five Year Trends. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Becker, W.E. 1997. Teaching economics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Literature 35 (September):1347-1373. Black, Dan A., Seth Sanders and Lowell Taylor. 2003. The economic reward for studying economics. Economic Inquiry. 41(3): 365-377. Boone, Louis E., and David L. Kurtz. 2001. CEOs: A Group Profile. Business Horizons (JulyAugust): 38-42. Brasfield, D.W., D. Harrison, J. McCoy, and M. Milkman. 1996. Why have some schools not experienced a decrease in the percentage of students majoring in economics? Journal of Economic Education 27(4):362-370. Chizmar, John F. 2000. A discrete-time hazard analysis of the role of gender in persistence in the economics major. Journal of Economic Education. 31(2): 107-118. Conrad, Cecilia.A. 1996. Where have all the majors gone? Comment. Journal of Economic Education. 27(3):376-378. Craft, R. Kim and Joe G. Baker. 2003. Do economists make better lawyers? Undergraduate degree field and lawyer earnings. Journal of Economic Education. 34(3): 263-281. Dyan, Karen E. and Cecilia Elena Rouse. 1997. The underrepresentation of women in economics: A study of undergraduate economics students. Journal of Economic Education. 28(4): 350-368. Ferber, M.A. 1995. The study of economics; a feminist critique. American Economic Review. 85(2):357-361. Green, Kenneth C. 1992. After the Boom: Management Majors in the 1990s. AACSB Special Report. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. Horvath, J., B.Q. Beaudin and S. P. Wright. 1992. Persisting in the introductory economics course. An exploration of gender difference. Journal of Economic Education. 23(2):101-108. 30 Haslehurst, J.,S. Hopkins and M. Thorpe. 1998. ‘Not rewarding,’ ‘not relevant,’ ‘not interesting’: Career choice of female economics students. Economic and Labour Relations Review. 9: 108122. Hughes, H. 1998. An economist’s explanation of the low proportion of women in the economics profession. Economic Papers 17:6-12. Jensen, E.J. and Owen, A.L. 2000. Why are women such reluctant economists? Evidence from liberal arts colleges. American Economic Review 90(2):466-470. Margo, Robert A., and John J. Siegfried. 1996. Long-run trends in economics bachelor’s degrees. Journal of Economic Education. 27(4):326-336. Nelson, J.A. 1995. Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 9(2):131-148. Nieswiadomy, Michael. 1998. LSAT Scores of economics majors. Journal of Economic Education. 29(4):377-379. Princeton Review. 2006. Undergraduate Majors accessed online August 15, 2006 at http://www.princetonreview.com/college/research/majors/majorBasics.asp?majorID=162 Pryor, John H., Sylvia Hurtado, Victor B. Saenz, Jennifer A. Lindhokm, William S. Korn, and Kathryn M. Mahoney. 2005. The American Freshman: National Norms for Fall 2005. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, UCLA. Richardson, S. 1998. Why do women make hopeless economists? (Or fail to succeed playing man-made economics by men’s rules). Economic Papers. 17(1):32-41. Rose, Robert E. and Calvin Wong. 1989. The MBA and Corporate Leadership. Business Horizons (September-October0: 54-57. Salemi, Michael K. and Carlie Eubanks. 1996. Long-run trends in economics bachelor’s degrees. Journal of Economic Education. 27(3): 326-336. Salemi, Michael K. 1996. Where have all the majors gone? Journal of Economic Education. 27(4): 323-325. Siegfried, John J. 2005. Trends in undergraduate economics degrees, 1991-2004. Journal of Economic Education. 36(3): 309-312. Siegfried, John J. 1997. Male-female differences in economic education. Journal of Economic Education 28(2): 1-11. Siegfried, John J. and David K. Round. 2001. International trends in economics degrees during the 1990s. Journal of Economic Education. 32(3): 203-218. 31 Siegfried, John J., and J.T. Wilkinson. 1982. The economics curriculum in the US. American Economic Review 72 (May):125-138. Skoorka, Bruce M. and Carol M. Condon. 2003. Trends in U.S. economics majors: Why the decline in the 1990s? Atlantic Economic Journal. 31(2): 195-204. Willis, Rachel A., and Paul J. Pieper. 1996. The economics major: A cross-sectional view. Journal of Economic Education. 27(4):337-349. Worthington, Andrew and Helen Higgs. 2004. Factors explaining the choice of an economics major. International Journal of Social Economics. 31(5/6): 593-613. 32