The Loyalty and Loss written by Margaret M. Storey is a well-written and persuasive book studying how the Unionists in Alabama, the Deep South state, confronted the Confederate authorities during the civil war and their life in the Reconstruction. The first interesting thing I found was that the diversity of the Unionists. The author tried to find the similarities among the different Unionists and surprisingly she found out that the Unionists were highly distributed. Some of them could from the infertile hill county and the others could from the rich Tennessee Valley. No matter how different their backgrounds were, all of them undertook great risks on defying the confederate authorities and fight for their belief.…
“Fahrenheit 451” has lot’s of symbolism representing the corruption of the government. The phoenix is a great representation of the rebirth of society. Montag had realized the people that had been hiding in the forest where memorizing books, their leader was Granger.…
In the memoir, Davis asserted that blacks “increased from a few unprofitable savages to millions of efficient Christian laborers.” Therefore, Jefferson and many other Lost Cause sympathizers, believed that Civil War had nothing to do with slavery and everything to with states’ rights. Jefferson’s quote speaks to the larger argument that slaves supported their old way of life. Blight demonstrates the significance of Southern memory in regards…
Blair began his book with an all out attack on President Truman, specifically Truman’s distrust of military officials and his decision of cutting back on the military’s budget; which, Blair claimed, cost many American lives. The book is in many ways a critical overview of the leadership of the American forces in Korea The Forgotten War is probably the most detailed book on any war that one could find; it also seems to be very critical of every military or political official involved in the Korean War. Blair’s book explains the placement, objective, and every command level decision.…
In another text - Ordeal by Fire: The Civil War and Reconstruction by James M. McPherson - the author has his own way of looking at Slavery, the Civil War, and the events that would follow that are both similar to and different than that of Slavery. On the side of similarity, both authors are quite clear that Slavery is an immoral, incorrect institution, and are quite unapologetic about this. However, McPherson focuses on both the South being completely wrong in almost every situation (not necessarily by citing facts, but the wording and tone used make this irrevocably true), that their insistence on maintaining a Slave-based society held the South back economically and culturally, and that the rise of the Republicans was the end of an era for the South. Elkins, instead, focuses on several different analyses, giving several possible viewpoints, and showing mistakes made on both sides of the issue, including the fact that, by refusing to compromise, the abolitionists were just as…
Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…
Emilie Davis was an African-American woman residing in the city of Philadelphia during the U.S Civil War. Still living with her family, Emilie worked as a seamstress while she attended the Institute of Colored Youth. Although she did not differ too much from the other free black women in her community, one thing that made Davis different was her diary. Emily kept a diary from the years of 1863 to 1865, and because of her entries, we today can get the closest thing to a firsthand experience of the events that took place in not only in Philadelphia but around the world during the Civil War. Of course, as we all know, the Civil War was most certainly not roses and rainbows. There were many ups and…
I picked this passage because I thought that this was a turning point in the book. This is when Wilm decides to start rebelling against the Soviet Union and Schuops. In this part of the book, Wilm realizes that he must vandalize and rebel against these awful forces. He realizes that his disabled father has been beaten for no reason, both his sister and mother have been sexually assaulted, and he is always being controlled by the Schuops and Soviets. His whole family thinks that this is the quality of life now and that they should just allow these things to happen. However, Wilm thinks that he should rebel, he believes that it is right and seeks revenge.…
All the reasons have a tendency, in the author's point of view, to point to the Republican administration of the Union on the need for drastic change in the leadership of military operations, and the general approach to military and domestic policies. This is especially true of the President Lincoln, whose authority grew, and the government during the war was almost unlimited. The political analysis of the situation of the war years provided throughout the book is not the key purpose of the author of 1861: The Civil War Awakening. The real aim of Goodheart (2011) is to present it fluently as it would be frivolous and arrogant in relation to this complex, multi-dimensional process. To understand the situation of those difficult years, to understand a complex set of problems which confronted Lincoln and his administration, is possible only if a reader grasps as much as possible, in order to break through…
He is not leaning towards the side of the fundamentalists nor the revisionists; he is taking a path straight down the middle, not siding with one or another. He takes the viewpoint of his own, and then describes the two sides and how he agrees with both of their statements, and also, how he disagrees. He uses points for the revisionists like how the political system split the nation into two, by the Democrats and the Republicans, and only those two. It split the nation into voting Union or Confederacy, which sparked the war. He realizes how this can have a major impact on the country splitting, but this was not the only reason Ayers mentions that could have begun the war. After stating this, Dr. Ayers begins to show where he is coming from on the fundamentalist side. The power of slavery very much divided the U.S. into two, with the South wanting to secede to keep an economy that was run by slavery. This is a huge factor of the war, but not the only one. He shows that this is also a factor, but the view of the revisionists cannot be left out. Overall, Dr. Ed Ayers shows that he is neither choosing one side nor another, that many factors helped cause the Civil War. He ends up making a very agreeable and smart decision on the…
Throughout “Small Change,” Malcolm Gladwell describes how the civil rights movement have changed. He introduces the traditional activism at the beginning of the essay. Then, he briefly introduces one example of reinvented social activism. The author shows social changes by using social media, such as Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube. The author points out that unlike traditional activism, recent social activism is empowered by social media and leads to unexpected results because they can easily unite people together for a cause. However, the author also argues that there are several drawbacks and contradiction. Unlike traditional activism, which is based on strong-tie relationship between ‘friends,’ recent social activism is based on weak-tie…
“The slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery.” --W. E. B. Dubois. The Civil War was history, and the North had won. Slaves were freed, known as freedmen, and given full American citizenship. The country needed help to come together and build back up after the disasters of the war. This building up was called Reconstruction. Which of the two, the North or the South, destroyed the rebuilding of the country? The Northern Neglect killed Reconstruction because of extreme racism and Grant’s ignorance towards the rebuilding.…
A man named Bud Sharpe from South Carolina had this to say about the Confederate Flag, “I feel like the flag’s the only thing working people like me have left.” (80) He takes pride in the South and hates that people are trying to change it. In North Carolina, there is a birthday party held to honor former Generals Stonewall Jackson and Robert E. Lee. This proves Southerners still adore their generals that fought for them. After his journey through Mississippi, Horwitz finally realized a pattern that he was seeing. “So there needed to be a black Memorial Day and a white Veterans Day… The best that could be hoped for was a grudging toleration of each other’s historical memory.” Horwitz now understands that Southerners will never forget their heritage. Confederates in the Attic would refute the statement that this country is “one nation, indivisible.” Horwitz witnessed southerners views first hand during his trip. They still hold a grudge against the North for what happened during the American Civil War. Southerners have way too much pride in their homeland to just forget about their history. The South may be part of the United States but they are…
Through the United Daughters of the Confederacy and other organizations, they built monuments, made speeches, held commemorations, cared for wounded veterans and widows, and oversaw the writing of school textbooks. Their influence on public perceptions of the period was profound. They helped create the Old South of Gone with the Wind, with its mint juleps, fine houses, beautiful belles, kind masters, and happy slaves. They contributed to the vilification of Reconstruction as an era of corruption, debauchery, and violence. They also unflinchingly portrayed the violent overthrow of democratic reforms as honorable acts that were necessary to ‘redeem’ the…
"To locate the most direct causes of the American Civil War," he contends in the preface, "one must look at the actions of governmental officeholders in the decades before that horrific conflict." Professor Michael F Holt needs no introduction among historians. He is single handedly regarded as one of the scholars who is most responsible for the emergence of what some call a neo-revisionist interpretation and outlook about the origins and circumstances that resulted in the Civil War. His ideas which are reflected throughout his books especially “The Fate of their country” emphasize that the reasons which caused The Civil War could have been and should have been averted. Defending this ideology Holt criticizes historians who stand by their argument of “Sectional conflict over slavery and slavery extension caused the Civil War”. Instead he preaches throughout his works that include many influential books including “The Fate of their Country” that, contingent political factors played a very huge and predominant role is stimulations factors causing disunion among the states.…