Preview

The Northern Neglect: South, Ruined Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
750 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Northern Neglect: South, Ruined Reconstruction
The Northern Neglect “The slave went free; stood a brief moment in the sun; then moved back again toward slavery.” --W. E. B. Dubois. The Civil War was history, and the North had won. Slaves were freed, known as freedmen, and given full American citizenship. The country needed help to come together and build back up after the disasters of the war. This building up was called Reconstruction. Which of the two, the North or the South, destroyed the rebuilding of the country? The Northern Neglect killed Reconstruction because of extreme racism and Grant’s ignorance towards the rebuilding. One reason the Northern Neglect ruined Reconstruction was because of the country’s extreme racism towards the blacks. There is a political cartoon on the cover of Harper’s Weekly, March 14, 1874, and it shows the North’s thoughts towards African Americans (Richardson 517). It shows the thoughts of the politicians that were freedmen that were fighting and being reckless. It is intended to mean that blacks are lazy, dumb, “fat cats”, corrupt, angry, and a threat to society. The North and South both agreed on the thought …show more content…
The reasons for this were because there was extreme racism and President Grant ignored the rebuilding for a period of time. Though the KKK and South corruption played a big part of the ending, Reconstruction wouldn’t have ended if it weren’t for the North, because they were the ones still moving it along in the first place with their hope. The North had started Reconstruction, so it makes sense that the North had to have finished it, and it did. One of the many causes of the North ending Reconstruction was because people lost hope. The fact that the blacks were to be free and the nation would start new and forget about the past was all too good to be true. The nation had to find their balance between the Southerners and Northerners where they could have a good

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Reconstruction was the period during which the United States began to rebuild after the Civil War, lasting from 1865 to 1877. It was to repair the North and the South politically, economically and socially. After the Civil War, the South’s economy was completely ruined and needed help from the Union government; which they were trying to stay way from. The Reconstruction can be evaluated both as a success and a failure. Its successes were the restoration of the eleven confederate states back to the union, giving African-Americans (ex-slaves) their freedom and rights and providing aid to the freed slaves and poor whites. Its failures were the Anti-African Americans groups such as the KKK, the Black Codes, not protecting the rights of the freedmen and the southern corruption. Although African-Americans were freed and gained their rights because of 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, and the ex-eleven confederate states came back to the union, the Reconstruction was more of a failure than a success.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, the southern soldiers were going back to devastated cities, destroyed railroads, and many cities were burned to the ground as a result of Sherman’s march from sea to sea. After the Civil War occurred, the slaves were given freedom from their owners, and slavery was banned. That attempt at reconstruction was not a complete fail, but it took a little bit of time for America to give social and economic equality to slaves. There were many attempts made by several different presidents, but not all seemed to work due to the South’s stubbornness. The failure of reconstruction later did not bring social and economic equality to former slaves in the south because of things like the Jim Crow laws and the South’s strong disproval of the outcome of the war.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who killed Reconstruction? Isn’t that the big question. North or South, who do you side with. North with their neglect or south with their resistance against Reconstruction. What is Reconstruction? Reconstruction was the time period after the Civil War, 1876 to be exact, where the slaves are free and trying to get jobs, fix their lives, get control again; they even made governments with both white and blacks, schools for black kids. That dream die fast though. So who did kill the Reconstruction, northern neglect or southern resistance?…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the South did use fear as a way to stop Reconstruction, is was the North, who overall was the cause of the end of Reconstruction. Following the Civil War, the North wanted to reform and reintroduce the South into the Union. Who really did end Reconstruction? The North is the main reason Reconstruction ended early.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    David Blight is a professor at Yale University, in the artical he has written "The Civil War Isn't Over" he claims we fail to do one of the two things in Reconstruction. The Civil war was a devastating battle within the United States in which 1 out of 5 men died, and as many as 750,000 sailors and soilders lost their lives. After the North's victory, it seemed as though torture and injustice was over. In fact, the unfair treatment of African Americans pushed foward well into the next century. While reconstruction's main focus was healing and justice, the North primarily focused on the healing aspect. If anything the former slaves were treated worse, when they lost their jobs they were left on the street, then fined a ridiculus price that could only be paid off by working. Though the former slaves had the right to own land, the white southerns were able to take a…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Our nation after the Civil War was torn apart. The South was in disarray and no one really knew where to start. The main goal of Reconstruction was to bring the rebel states back into the Union and help the freedmen become a part of society. Reconstruction did not go as smoothly as planned, but these two goals were achieved…mostly. It became a huge political mess chock full of ill-intentioned politicians.…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who killed reconstruction?Why did they kill reconstruction?South or North?It is definitely a topic that is important in American history. Reconstruction is a an era after the Civil War when the south was absolutely destroyed,getting the economy back up,and seeing what to with the “Freedmen”. Since most of the war was mostly fought in the south,the entire south was burned down,all the buildings or houses had bullet holes or cannon shots in them,which was all part of the reconstruction. There were all types of emotions and feelings about this era,some wanted to free the African-American slaves but on the other side some people/groups didn’t want them. In my honest opinion I believe that both the South and North had a part in killing reconstruction…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Reconstruction was primarily to reunite the country and to construct a southern society not based on slavery. Since many dilemmas were left after the Civil War, the federal government tried to repair them.(Schultz,2014,275) Although the Reconstruction, era had quite the number of accomplishments, in my opinion, I strongly agree it was a grad failure.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1860, the North was not the place to be if you were an African American. In 1860, there was a lot of “free blacks” in the Northern states, but were they actually free?, they couldn't eat at restaurants, shop in markets or stores, or even have basic jobs. Free blacks were not free at all in the North. They had no rights, no political freedom, and they couldn't work a job. Free blacks could not eat at restaurants, shop in stores, work jobs, or even buy land. They had no political freedom either, they could not vote or represent anybody in court. They were not even allowed to work the most basic of jobs.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What had formerly been ruled by Democratic hardliners was now governed by equally radical Republicans intent on changing the ways of the South. One of the primary goals of Reconstruction was to integrate blacks into Southern society and readmit the states that seceded, but only after blacks had won full political and civil equality (Wormser, “Reconstruction”). This, however, did not align with the idea that most Southern leaders at the time held, and there was an obvious backlash to the Republican…

    • 1069 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The period following the Civil War is called Reconstruction. The goals of the Reconstruction were to abolish slavery, allow former slaves to be citizens and have rights, integrate blacks into society, destabilize the Southern government (Confederacy), and reunited the country. Although the North won the war, the South did not win Reconstruction. Both Democrats and the Ku Klux Klan caused Reconstruction to slow down, especially in the South.…

    • 494 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The “New South’ should have been a time for new beginnings for all, but it was taken advantage of by greedy entrepreneurs from the north, who capitalized off the weakness of the South after the war (Sitterson 1952). During this time the South was still being led by “Whigs with industrial, commercial, and capitalistic interest”. It was not just that which held the south back, but it was also the resistance and…

    • 192 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    What was Reconstruction supposed to accomplish? Was it supposed to provide a new economic start for the freed peoples? Was it supposed to rebuild and reorder the state governments that had seceded? Was it supposed to prosecute and imprison former Confederate officials? These questions were never fully answered, and for the most part they were never even adequately addressed.…

    • 5567 Words
    • 23 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the American Civil War more than just a divided nation needed to be reunited. The states of the Confederacy had been broken. The destruction of their economy was total. From the insolvency of their currency, to the decimation of so much of the white male population to the sudden loss of billions of dollars of property in the form of freedom for nearly 4 million African slaves. What is more is the ex-slaves faced what seemed like insurmountable odds in trying to find loved ones and make a start in a prostate region without any real economic means or many skills that would assist them in this effort. The Southern white population would surely fight them at every step, so any improvement beyond their sudden freedom would depend largely on the benevolence of Northern lawmakers and charitable acts from liberal whites from Northern states heading south to assist them in this massive undertaking. The results of these efforts are mixed and in the end had no lasting impact, but the period of Reconstruction showed promise, but in the end failed due to a lack of political will and interest in the plight of the former slave in the South.…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Reconstruction after the Civil War was a time of resolving conflicts between the North and the South. The South had recently been demolished by the end of the war leaving social, political, and economic problems to be solved. One of the more significant problems being the struggling battle to remove slavery and instituting equality and justice for African Americans. At the time, the American people needed a president who was able to move forward from all the causes of the Civil War. In fact, a president of that description existed, and his name was Abraham Lincoln.…

    • 1092 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays