Preview

Why Did South Kill Reconstruction

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
812 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Why Did South Kill Reconstruction
Who killed reconstruction?Why did they kill reconstruction?South or North?It is definitely a topic that is important in American history.Reconstruction is a an era after the Civil War when the south was absolutely destroyed,getting the economy back up,and seeing what to with the “Freedmen”.Since most of the war was mostly fought in the south,the entire south was burned down,all the buildings or houses had bullet holes or cannon shots in them,which was all part of the reconstruction.There were all types of emotions and feelings about this era,some wanted to free the African-American slaves but on the other side some people/groups didn’t want them.In my honest opinion I believe that both the South and North had a part in killing reconstruction …show more content…
Grant.Many Northern voters moved to the attention of the Panic of 1873 and the corruption of President Grant.He was a drunk and full of frauds. According to Gerald Danzer and his article,The Americans,Mcdougal Littell 1998, he wrote “...many Northerner voters shifted their attention to such national concerns as the panic of 1873 and corruption in Grant’s administration…”.This means that although the Northern people liked Grant because he was a Northerner,it became noticeable he might’ve been reconsidered because of his scandals and his place in being a drunk as the president.Even some people being pro-Grant and pro-freedman,they thought the blacks were unsuitable for “political duties”.Also stated in document d, “The blacks,as a people,are unfitted for the proper exercise for political duties...The rising generation of...blacks needed a period of probation and instruction…”This quote means that the blacks weren’t educated enough to be in a big position of government because they have no experience and have forgotten their condition as a slave.This shows how some Northerners weren’t always on the freedman side because they were indecisive and at a point corrupt with Grant being

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The Reconstruction was the period during which the United States began to rebuild after the Civil War, lasting from 1865 to 1877. It was to repair the North and the South politically, economically and socially. After the Civil War, the South’s economy was completely ruined and needed help from the Union government; which they were trying to stay way from. The Reconstruction can be evaluated both as a success and a failure. Its successes were the restoration of the eleven confederate states back to the union, giving African-Americans (ex-slaves) their freedom and rights and providing aid to the freed slaves and poor whites. Its failures were the Anti-African Americans groups such as the KKK, the Black Codes, not protecting the rights of the freedmen and the southern corruption. Although African-Americans were freed and gained their rights because of 13th, 14th and 15th amendments, and the ex-eleven confederate states came back to the union, the Reconstruction was more of a failure than a success.…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In Redemption: Last Battle of the Civil War by Nicholas Lemann a new idea called reconstruction is starting to arise in the nation. The book itself sets up the reader to picture one of the bloodiest wars of all time. The main idea of the book is how Reconstruction failed because of hostile and rude schemes by the Democratic Party and white southerners during elections. The main reason for reconstruction was to put union backs together and free the slaves for once and for all, the ideas were doomed soon as they were looked upon due to the. Southern Democrats were poised to win with little to no interference at the ballot box both locally and eventually, at the national…

    • 121 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Though in 1863 before the Emancipation Proclamation came about General Grant made a statement after capturing the Confederates in Vicksburg. It was too one of his best friends Elihu Washburne a Congressman. It was “The people of the North need not quarrel over the institution of slavery” (Huebner). Grant had sent this letter in a critical time when the Union was getting a tone of victories and at the same time being backed up by reinforcement. This came in a critical time when Grant had won the Battle of Gettysburg.…

    • 1247 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who killed Reconstruction? Isn’t that the big question. North or South, who do you side with. North with their neglect or south with their resistance against Reconstruction. What is Reconstruction? Reconstruction was the time period after the Civil War, 1876 to be exact, where the slaves are free and trying to get jobs, fix their lives, get control again; they even made governments with both white and blacks, schools for black kids. That dream die fast though. So who did kill the Reconstruction, northern neglect or southern resistance?…

    • 530 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The South ended reconstruction because there was lack of interest in equal rights and the violence they had towards the blacks and the North. The south was filled with Ku Klux Klan members and all they did was either threaten, attack, or kill the people who were apart of reconstructing or helping during reconstruction. They were ready to put an end to the movements of the northerners who fled to the south to help the free blacks, scalawags, and the carpetbaggers. They started by targeting black officials and people who were in power. Hints why Abram Colby was attacked.…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    While the South did use fear as a way to stop Reconstruction, is was the North, who overall was the cause of the end of Reconstruction. Following the Civil War, the North wanted to reform and reintroduce the South into the Union. Who really did end Reconstruction? The North is the main reason Reconstruction ended early.…

    • 101 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Reconstruction Era had caused many problems among the black people, the south, and the North (The Union). During this Reconstruction Era the South had found any possible loopholes that they could use to take black people’s rights away such as needing to do a literature test before voting, and used their power to scare and threaten black people into doing what they had wanted. To what length did the south destroy Reconstruction? The south had killed Reconstruction by using any and all loopholes they found, and abused power knowing they wouldn’t have consequences. During the Reconstruction Era there were many ways that the South had managed to destroy Reconstruction.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politically, blacks had no freedoms to speak up in the northern states when it came to the government. According to Document A,…

    • 856 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The South resisted all attempts at Reconstruction at every turn in an attempt to keep slavery and undermine African American social, political and economic opportunities. Reconstruction (1865-1877) is the time in which former confederate states were re-entered into the Union. During this time, the South was divided into military districts, and occupied by Union soldiers. It was a period in which opportunities for former slaves were expanded, as well as a period of unrest and resistance from the South against these changes. Although it is unclear who truly put an end to Reconstruction, it is evident that the South did all it could to resist it and the changes it brought.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States of America was at the end of the line, disagreements arose everywhere turning brother against brother. Our beloved country broke out in a bloody massacre of the North states against the South, they called it the Civil War. hen it was over and the North won, the bonds weren’t as strong as before and the war had hit the USA harder than expected. President Lincoln made a plan to save our country called REconstruction, he wanted 10% of white southern men to take an oath of loyalty and they were off the hook for almost destroying the country. North or South: Who killed Reconstruction?…

    • 479 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After the Civil War, there was huge amount of attempts to alter the society in the Southern states. The main ideas in the North were to merge blacks into society as quickly as possible.But of course the South was not as eager. In fact, the South wanted to expire all chances for the Reconstruction effort because they knew what it was leading to. Due to their social lack of interest in equal rights, their political violence towards blacks and their opponents The South killed Reconstruction because of their lack of interest in equal rights, their violence towards the North and blacks, and the North’s growing absence of sympathy towards blacks.…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Arguably the most revolutionary decision America has ever made: Reconstruction. Reconstruction was the process of freeing black slaves and “rebuilding America”. It was doomed from the start, but who destroyed it? That’s a difficult question, as it could easily be the South or the North that doomed black people for nearly 100 years. The Southerners resisted Reconstruction a lot; the Klu Klux Klan was formed [and still exists today], political cartoons showed people who supported Reconstruction as stupid or evil, and they created the Compromise of 1877. It could also be the North, because after a while they just stopped caring. Although they had won the war and had control over the South, it became a lot of effort and work to try to free the blacks and undo the damage. Personally, I think that Northern neglect is what truly put an end to Reconstruction.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    . There were many problems with grant because he believed in many things that were his own and had been in many situations that he should never be in like tax frauds and other things and the people lost trust for him and the north went against hi and didn't trust the resurrection. So they went against him and did not trust the process so therefore they went against him and everything began into big corruption. So that brings me to my last event which is when the northern blacks were well educated and knew what they were voting for.…

    • 805 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Each of the four articles portrayed a different explanation for why Reconstruction did not work out as planned by the United States Government. Thomas W. Wilson’s article reveals that the government preyed upon the South. Carter Woodson asserts that former slaves were not given a fair chance to make Reconstruction work, while Thomas Bailey blames the Radicals for pushing it on clueless, former slaves. Finally, Mary Beth Norton takes issue with the resistance of Reconstruction that the South held from the beginning. While each tells a varied story of their interpretation of why it failed, all agree that indeed, Reconstruction failed. Thus, former slaves were not given a fair chance to reconstruct their lives and the Southern states could…

    • 894 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This was called Reconstruction. The north liked the idea of abolishing slavery while the south objected the abolishment. North or South: Who killed Reconstruction? The North and the South both killed Reconstruction for two different reasons: 1)In the South supporters of Reconstruction were being killed and intimidated by the KKK.…

    • 297 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays