Preview

Eeoc V. Wc&M Enterprises, Inc., 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. August 10, 2007)

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1120 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eeoc V. Wc&M Enterprises, Inc., 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. August 10, 2007)
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v.
WC&M Enterprises, Inc.
496 F.3d 393 (5th Cri. 2007)

EEOC v. WC&M Enterprises, Inc., 496 F.3d 393 (5th Cir. August 10, 2007)
Facts: This is a Title VII action alleging harassment based on national origin and religion. The facts are set forth in the light most favorable to Rafiq. On May 11, 2001, Mohommed Rafiq was hired as a car salesman. Rafiq was born in India and is a practicing Muslim. The alleged harassment began on September 11, 2001. When he arrived for work that afternoon, his co-workers were watching news coverage of the terrorist attacks and one of them asked him in a mocking way, "Where have you been?", as if to infer that he had participated in the attacks.
After the United States took military action in Afghanistan, two of his co-workers began calling him "Taliban" multiple times per day. Also, Rafiq 's direct supervisor called him "Taliban" on four or five occasions. Rafiq repeatedly asked his co-workers to stop calling him "Taliban," to no avail. He also complained to supervisors without any real success.
Rafiq also alleges that he was ridiculed in other ways. A co-worker asked: "Why don 't you just go back to where you came from since you believe what you believe?" Also, two co-workers mocked his religious dietary restrictions and his need to pray during the workday. They also referred to him as "Arab" even though he told them on numerous occasions that he was from India. Also, a co-worker played a "Taliban" joke over the speaker on the sales floor. Rafiq alleges that this harassment continued until the end of his employment.
On October 16, 2002, Rafiq got into a dispute with his supervisor, Jerry Swigart, after Swigart told him that it was mandatory for all employees to attend a United Way meeting. When Rafiq questioned him on the connection between the meeting and his job, Swigart allegedly said: "This is America. That 's the way things work over here. This is not the Islamic country where you

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Facts of the Case: In early 2000, an African-American name James Daniel, Jr applied for an Executive Team Leader position with Target. He was given tests, which he passed placing him in a very high percentile of those who have been previously tested. Unfortunately he was not hired, and was given the explanation of not meeting the requirements of the position. Daniels did not receive any feedback as to what requirement he was meeting in the interviewing process. Later three other African-American applicants, Kalisa White, Ralpheal Edgeston and Cherise Brown inquired about the same position involving contact with the Store Team Leader Matthew Armiger. White sent her resume and called to schedule an…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This law prohibits employers from discriminating their employees on the basis of religion, race, sex, color, and national origin. Since Mrs. Ledbetter was paid significantly less than her male employees at Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. it is evident that she felt she was a victim of gender discrimination, and thus filed a complaint against Goodyear for violating the Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights…

    • 751 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Union Pacific Case Summary

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Complainant began her employment as an Associate Systems Consultant (Assoc. Sys. Consult.) on July 25, 2011. She was a member of the Information Technology (IT) Team, referred to as Application Development-Operations. Jason Hochwender, Director, Information Technology , oversees the Application Development area. The Assoc. Sys. Consult. position is associated with a specific career path designed for individuals who contribute within a team environment. The duties of an Assoc. Sys. Consult. include, but are not limited to the following:…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The EEOC filed suit complaining that FedEx violated Title I of the ADA by failing to provide reasonable accommodations and for discharging him in retaliation for his discrimination complaint. Additionally, the complaint sought compensatory damages (i.e., damages paid to compensate the claimant for actual injury or harms they suffered) and punitive damages (i.e., exemplary damages paid to penalize the defendant) for their alleged failure to act in good faith, and for malice and reckless indifference to his federally-protected rights under the ADA. The district court of Maryland awarded Lockhart the sums of $8,000 in compensatory damages and $100,000 in punitive damages, based on a jury finding against FedEx for failing to reasonably accommodate Lockhart under the ADA.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Eeoc Vs Freeman Case Brief

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages

    According to the law case EEOC v. FREEMAN, the EEOC filed a law suit against Freeman and alleged the company’s hiring policy which includes criminal background and credit history checks, has a disparate impact on African-American, Hispanic, and male applicants. And the material fact of this case is whether Defendant’s hiring criteria of conducting criminal background and credit history checks is consistent with business necessity. Since the Defendant was charged by the EEOC with unlawful discrimination in this case, the source of law is the Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII prohibits discrimination in hiring, firing, trainings, promotion, discipline, or other workplace decisions on the basis of an employee or applicant’s race, color, gender, national origin, or religion” (Bennett- Alexander & Hartman, 2011).…

    • 1279 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order for this suit to be under Title VII, Sosebee needed to exhaust the administrative remedies by filing a charge with the EEOC. TABC was able to produce nonretaliatory, nondiscriminatory reasons for Sosebee’s punishments which resulted in the case against being…

    • 736 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week5 Assignment

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages

    First, we want to appreciate your support and the opportunities that you and your company has provided to us in many ways over the years. This year, we want to expand the conference to include robotics and a section in medical technology.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a federal law that protects individuals from discrimination based on religion. Religious discrimination is treating a person differently because of their religious believes. In this case Elaine Mobley, a member of the nonsectarian Unitarian Universalist Church, can file a legal sue under religious discrimination or the Civil Rights Act of 1964, because she was discriminated by employees and her supervisor. They said that she would be “making efforts repeatedly to “save the soul” of a fellow employee” (Neill, 2014, Web). A proven wrongful dismissal will tend to lead to two main remedies: reinstatement of the dismissed employee, and/or monetary compensation for the wrongfully dismissed. In this case the court should look on how Elaine Mobley told her supervisor that she was feeling harassed by her employees, and shortly after that she was fired. In this case the judge should rule in favor of Elaine Mobley, because of what we have of the case it seems that she was being harassed and told her director of division and did nothing but fire her. The employer did in fact discriminate unlawfully, because you cannot force someone to become one of your same religion. It is especially unlawful to leave messages in her desk stating “How can you speak of God and Reject me? I love you and know all about you” as the book stated (Nkomo, Fottler, McAfee, 7 edition, p. 56).…

    • 2010 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Title VII protects employees from being discriminated against based on sex, race, color, national origin and religion. In this case, Fragrante was denied a job position. He was not denied that position based on his religion, sex, race, color or national origin. He was not given the position because of his strong accent when speaking. Being able to speak and be understood by the public was a part of that position. The strong accent prevents that. I believe the Bona Fide Occupational Qualification applies more to this case than title VII. Bona Fide Occupational Qualification allows certain employment discrimination. This discrimination must be business necessary and job related. Honolulu’s division of motor vehicles and licensing had every right…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects workers from discrimination based on their race, color, religion, sex, and national origin. In order for an employee to present a prima facie case for national origin discrimination, an employee would have to have prima facie evidence sufficient enough for a decision or verdict to be…

    • 1200 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Group 1 Paper Edited

    • 1669 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Meatpacking Factory is a case study involving the decision of a factory manager to let his Muslim workers observe their faith by taking breaks at sunrise and sundown during their holy month of Ramadan. James Windham, the factory manager, thought their request was well warranted and felt he should be considerate of the religious beliefs of his employees. There are about 100 Muslim workers which represents 20% of the employee population at the factory. To Windham’s dismay, the breaks began having a significantly negative affect on productivity due to the ever shifting sunset and sundown times. Trying to accommodate a constantly changing schedule left Windham struggling to nail down a consistent schedule, in addition to facing vehement opposition from other staff and the surrounding community. Some workers accused him of showing favoritism and allowing himself to be manipulated by the Muslim workers.…

    • 1669 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Tosias

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Praise for the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community came from attendees, including Harper, who said "Calgarians, Albertans and Canadians will see the moderate, benevolent face of Islam in this mosque and the people who worship here." [2] According to Embassy magazine, regarding Harper's remarks, a governing party insider said "It's an important signal the prime minister is sending, not just to militant Islamists abroad, but to their sympathizers here at home, that he's perfectly prepared to ignore them and side with persecuted minorities within the faith.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Rang de Basanti Notes

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages

    * Friends scene – saying maybe Ashfaq should go to Afghanistan, he will be safe with “his own”. Friend asks why am I not one of your own? First friend asks for forgiveness, it is as much your country as it is mine.…

    • 591 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Interview With A Masjid

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Sohail, Shahariar, and I went into the room where Sohail was teaching the children earlier and took a seat. The beginning of the interview consisted of questions about the religion and his own experience with it. The first thing that I asked Hasanjes was how he came to believe in Islam, he explained to me that he was born to an Islamic family in Pakistan and first practiced Islam there, but he “really came to understand Islam here in the U.S.” I asked what effect Islam has had on his life, he told me that Islam affects every aspect of your life, It affects everything from how you interact with other people and that “all your moral values come from Islam.” Before I came to masjid I had known that prayer is one of the five pillars of Islam, or one of the things that a muslim must do. I asked Sohail “What happens if you miss a prayer,” he explained to me that you never miss prayer, that if you cannot do the movements you lift your arm, if you are in the hospital and cannot do anything but move a finger, then you move a finger. He said that you do not miss prayer if you can avoid it. He said that he even prays at work, that he has spoken to his boss in that other people will take smoke breaks, and that his boss can just count this as a sort of smoke break. He said “ I tell my supervisor I’m going to take a break and I do my prayers.” But what he told me next surprised me he said that God does not need our prayers, prayer is for us, not him; that “If you miss a prayer God is forgiving.” This surprised me, because in my own experience I had always heard people make the Islamic God sound like a bad guy, but the way these people described and worshipped him, he seemed like a very good…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Dr. Qamar Ul Islam’s dropout from the cabinet kicked up a major row, as he called it an insult to the Muslim community.…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays