Preview

Leigh Sosebee V. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
736 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Leigh Sosebee V. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission
Major Case Study – Sexual Harassment
April 9, 2014 I. Case: Leigh Sosebee, Plaintiff, v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission, Defendant

II. Facts of the Case
The plaintiff, Leigh Sosebee, filed a suite with the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission that she was discriminated against because of her sex and retaliation. Sosebee filed the lawsuit in September of 2011 after being an employee since 2007. Sosebee complained of the sexual harassment in 2009 claiming her direct sergeant and other agents made her work environment at times hostile resulting in the termination of four agents. Sosebee requested to be relocated to Cleburne to the Fort Worth district and assigned to work with Jack Miller, a Field Training Officer. In February
…show more content…
In her charge with EEOC she claimed "I have been discriminated against because of my sex, female and retaliated against for complaining of discrimination in violation of Title VII section 704(a) of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended." (EEOC)
III. Laws that apply
Sosebee filed her suit to be considered sexual harassment under Title VII. According to the EEOC, sexual harassment is a form of harassment to a person because of that person’s sex, unwelcome sexual advances or offensive remarks about a person’s sex. Sosebee filed under Title VII because she felt as though the reasons for punishments were because of her sex. iv. Final Decision of the Court
In order for this suit to be under Title VII, Sosebee needed to exhaust the administrative remedies by filing a charge with the EEOC. TABC was able to produce nonretaliatory, nondiscriminatory reasons for Sosebee’s punishments which resulted in the case against being
…show more content…
Texas Alcoholic Beverage Commission the employer responded correctly to the events that occurred with the Plaintiff, Leigh Sosebee. In 2009 when Sosebee claimed to be working in a hostile work environment caused by sexual harassment behavior by her supervising sergeant and other agents, TABC took the claims seriously and terminated the agents. Sosebee then requested to be transferred to another district because of her work environment which was again granted. TABC is an Equal Opportunity Employer which is why they took the situation seriously. According to the EEOC, an employer can avoid being liable for the employees’ actions if the employer can prove that: it is reasonably tried to prevent and promptly correct the harassing behavior; and the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    The issue: Plaintiff Anucha Brown Sanders is suing defendants MSG, Isiah Lord Thomas, and James Dolan, alleging that she was discriminated on the basis of her sex and terminated in retaliation for her sexual harassment complaint against MSG and Thomas. MSG counterclaimed against plaintiff for breach of fiduciary duty.…

    • 403 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The legal case of Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc. is a sex discrimination case under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. “Title VII specifically forbids any employer to … discriminate with respect to compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment in any way that would deprive any individual of employment opportunity due to race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.” (Twomey, 2013, p. 397). In this case, Oncale claimed that he was being discriminated against in his workplace because of his sex. In reading the case online, Oncale was “was forcibly subjected to sex-related, humiliating actions against him … in the presence of the rest…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The difficult part of this case to determine is whether Thompson’s suit is covered within Title VII. Initially, the District Court ruled that Title VII “does not permit third party retaliation claims”. But if the termination of Thompson’s employment was a retaliatory act for the charge filed by his fiancée, Shouldn’t Thompson be protected? Another question to ask is, “Would Regalado have filed the charge if she knew it would have gotten her fiancé fired?” The issue in this…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Mgmt 520 Week 5 Assignment

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Based on the given facts, she was the subject of jokes in her work place as she was being picked on based on her gender. Since she was the only woman in her department, the male employees subject her to cruel and mean jokes on several occasion when other workers placed a sign on a truck that stated "Hardhat Required/Bra Optional”. This is clearly an illustration that she is working in a hostile environment since the repeated jokes made on her gender has created an intimidating place of work. The case of Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson is applicable to Pollard where the Supreme Court ruled that hostile work environment sex discrimination is an actionable wrong under Title VII. The fact that the Vice President of the bank made sexual advances against complainant created a hostile work environment and is a form of a sexual harassment covered by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The severe and pervasive conduct of the vice president who repeated sexually abused on the victim in exchange for sexual favors at the office qualify the acts as punishable under Title VII. Here, the acts of the Teddy’s workers against Pollard constitute Hostile Work Environment (HWE) sexual harassment through the vulgar sexual jokes and…

    • 1552 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Civil Rights Act of 1964, Title VII, forbids “an employer to … discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s … sex.” Civil Rights Act, 1964. In Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, the court held that “a plaintiff may establish a violation of Title VII by proving that discrimination based on sex has created a hostile or abusive work environment.” Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson (US 1986). A hostile work environment is created when the environment at work creates anxiety so severe as to result in an alteration of the terms and conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. The burden to prove such an environment was created rests on the plaintiff. The plaintiff must prove that they belong to a protected class; were subject to unwelcomed harassment; the harassment is based on sex, meaning it is not happening to members of the opposite sex; and the harassment alters the conditions of employment. Hailey Course Pack, p. 140. In this case, the court will evaluate whether Black has sufficient evidence to prove her claim of a hostile work environment.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    2. In March of 1998, Ledbetter submitted a questionnaire to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleging sex discrimination against her employer. In July of 1998, she filed a formal EEOC charge against the company.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Manner Case Summary

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff is an African-American woman who is employed by the state as a correctional officer. The Plaintiff’s supervisor (who is a female) made negative comments about the African-American workers on her staff and the Plaintiff complained. The supervisor called the Plaintiff at home and made comments about how the Plaintiff should focus on her family, and asked whether her husband had ever hit her. There were also incidents of insensitive racial comments. The Plaintiff filed a claim alleging a hostile workplace under both race and…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Malika Curry, Aggrieved Party, (AP) alleged that she was discriminated against based on reprisal for a union grievance, Color and Disability as evidenced by the following:…

    • 225 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Second Case

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages

    This was a case brought to action by Joanne Zippittelli against her employer, J.C. Penney Company. Her defense for creating case was that she was overlooked for the position in question due to her age. Zippittelli was one of four women who applied for the position with the company. All four women had the same job title and when they were interviewed by the Personnel Manager, he determined that there were three candidates including the plaintiff qualified for the position. Johnson then ranked the applicants, making the plaintiff his third choice (Twomey, pg. 537). After a consultation with Johnson’s supervisor, he hired his first choice, Patti Cruikshank. Zippittelli had a conversation with her supervisor, Anita Benko about how she was overlooked. Benko asked Zippittelli how old she was at which time Zippittelli responded she was 63. Benko made the statement that she would “probably not” get the position. After having this conversation with her supervisor Zippittelli was convinced her age was to blame for her lack of success within the company. Zippittelli filed a complaint with the EEOC and received a right-to-sue letter. The Age discrimination in Employment Act prohibits discrimination against any individual over the age of 40 with respect to “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s age (Twomey, pg. 538).…

    • 898 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Rawlinson’s perused her arguments that weight wasn’t an issue to perform the necessary job duties of a corrections officer because of her weight. Rawlinson’s filed a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleging sex discrimination. Rawlinson’s continue with a civil complaint filed by Southern Poverty Law Center and district complaint that’s known as a Supreme Court Case Dothard V. Rawlinson, 433 U.S. 321 (1977). Rawlinson had to prove Alabama violated Title VII Civil Rights Act of 1964. According to the Title VII, it’s a women choice to work in all dangerous environment.…

    • 559 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Title Vii Case

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Title VII states that it is an unlawful practice for an employer to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of such individual’s race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Mary has now vowed to not hire ANY while males in her department after Paul made a backhand comment about why they downsized 25% of their white male workforce in order to be more HR compliant. Paul now feels that that was a wrong decision and that they should hire more white males. Also, Mary is guilty…

    • 432 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The complaint procedure for a disparate impact and a disparate treatment claim as it pertains to the EEOC;…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Darius D’Amore

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages

    On November 21, 1991, Congress enacted the Civil Rights Act of 1991. The 1991 Act amended several of the statutes enforced by EEOC, both substantively and procedurally. Previously, jury trials were possible only in cases brought under the EPA or the ADEA. Under the provisions of the 1991 Act, parties could now obtain jury trials, and recover compensatory and punitive damages in Title VII and ADA lawsuits involving intentional discrimination. The Act placed statutory caps on the amount of damages that could be awarded for future pecuniary losses, pain and suffering, and punitive damages, based on employer size. The 1991 Act added a new subsection to Title VII, codifying the disparate impact theory of discrimination, essentially putting the law back as it had been prior to Wards Cove. and in response to Price-Waterhouse, the Act provided that where the plaintiff shows that discrimination was a motivating factor for an employment decision, the employer is liable for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs (but not individual monetary or affirmative relief) even though it proves it would have made the same decision in the absence of a discriminatory motive. The Act also provided employment discrimination protection to employees of Congress and some high-level political appointees. Lastly, Title VII and ADA coverage was extended to include American and American-controlled employers operating abroad.…

    • 2109 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    You Are the Judge

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Plaintiff's Arguments: Elaine, the plaintiff, believes she has been wrongfully discharged based on the following facts. To start with, the moral minimum law encourages a business to not only obey the law but also avoid doing harm to others. It’s unethical to dismiss Elaine without a legitimate reason and early notice after she has served the company for only two months. Since one of the functions of law is to shape moral standards, Jerry’s behavior should be discouraged. In addition, as mentioned in the case, Elaine was given no reason for the termination. It’s likely that gender is a factor when Jerry fired Elaine and hired Kramer since Kramer was no better than Elaine in terms of skill and knowledge. Title VII specifically prohibits employers from engaging in sex discrimination. It’s legitimate that Elaine sues Jerry for sex discrimination in violation of the statutory exception. Lastly, Elaine can sue Jerry for breach of contract using the contract exception. The job offer letter could be considered an implied-in-fact contract…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Gives EEOC authority to sue in federal courts when it finds reasonable cause to believe that there has been employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This is a federal and state law.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays