Preview

Second Case

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
898 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Second Case
HRMG - 5700
Instructor: Sandy McDonough
Student: Karen Head

This was a case brought to action by Joanne Zippittelli against her employer, J.C. Penney Company. Her defense for creating case was that she was overlooked for the position in question due to her age. Zippittelli was one of four women who applied for the position with the company. All four women had the same job title and when they were interviewed by the Personnel Manager, he determined that there were three candidates including the plaintiff qualified for the position. Johnson then ranked the applicants, making the plaintiff his third choice (Twomey, pg. 537). After a consultation with Johnson’s supervisor, he hired his first choice, Patti Cruikshank. Zippittelli had a conversation with her supervisor, Anita Benko about how she was overlooked. Benko asked Zippittelli how old she was at which time Zippittelli responded she was 63. Benko made the statement that she would “probably not” get the position. After having this conversation with her supervisor Zippittelli was convinced her age was to blame for her lack of success within the company. Zippittelli filed a complaint with the EEOC and received a right-to-sue letter. The Age discrimination in Employment Act prohibits discrimination against any individual over the age of 40 with respect to “compensation, terms, conditions, or privileges of employment, because of an individual’s age (Twomey, pg. 538).
The plaintiff then had to prove her case by showing (1) she is within the protected age class, (2) that she was qualified for the position, (3) she was dismissed despite being qualified, (4) she was replace by a person sufficiently younger. Once this is determined, it now falls upon the defendant to produce the burden of proof that it had a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for the discharge (Twomey, pg. 538). In the end the court felt Zippittelli did not have sufficient evidence to support her claim of discrimination due to her age.
Case

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    LIT1 Task 310

    • 695 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Facts of Situation B as it pertains to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967…

    • 695 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the case of Wittenburg v. American Express Financial Advisors, Inc. (AEFA), Bonnie Wittenburg was an employee for AEFA in their Minneapolis office. The plaintiff was hired by the company in November of 1998 at the age of forty-six to serve as an Equity Research Analyst in AEFA's Equity Investment Department. During a reduction in force by the defendant in 2003, the plaintiff was terminated. In January of 2004, the plaintiff filed a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and received her Notice of Right to Sue on January 30, 2004. The plaintiff filed suit on February 13, 2004 alleging that she was discriminated and retaliated against by the defendant as a result of her age and gender. AEFA moved for a summary judgment.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Elaine was fired without good reason or notice. The employer then replaced Elaine with a male employee with less job experience and less education. Elaine has a good chance of getting her job back by suing her employer for sex descrimination. Her successor was inferior to Elaine in a few key areas and that may prove the employer fired her due to descrimination.…

    • 454 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The “Zimpfer vs. Palm Beach County” case is about a lawsuit filed by Mr. Bryce Zimpfer against Palm Beach County alleging a violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act. Mr. Zimpher, age 52, has worked for the county’s employee relations area and this employment had lasted for 16 years. There was a vacancy which was advertised by the county for the position of employee relations manager, a position which Mr. Zimpfer decided to apply for. After considering all the applications, the county chose a candidate, Mr. Brad Merriman, age 33, to fill this position.…

    • 1111 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Citation to the case is 203 F.3d 135. The Key facts of the case are Danuta Ryduchowski worked for Port Authority as an engineer from 1988 to 1995. In September of 1995 Ms. Ryduchowski was fired from her job. On November 14th 1996 Ms. Ryduchowski filed a claim that Port Authority discriminated against her on the basis of her gender and national origin she claimed that, while working at the Port Authority, she was subjected to insults, jokes, and harassment related to her gender and national origin. She asserted that as a result of this discrimination, Port Authority failed to promote. They also did not pay her equally as they would a male colleague. Ms. Ryduchowskis was at time of hire the only female engineer on the staff. She had a good…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Lit1

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Due to a 2009 ruling by the Supreme Court, discrimination based on age can sometimes be difficult to prove. However, in employee B’s case, they were informed that the hiring decision was based on their age. Employee B is 68 years old and is protected from this type of discrimination. This is definitely a violation of the ADEA…

    • 600 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zippittelli V Jc Penny

    • 6840 Words
    • 28 Pages

    The plaintiff, who is 66 years old, brought this employment discrimination suit against her employer, J.C. Penney, after the company failed to promote her to the position of shift operations manager at the company's Moosic, Pennsylvania Customer Service Center. (See Complaint (Doc. 1)). She alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e) et seq., retaliation claims under both acts, and the same claims under the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (PHRA), 43 P.S. § 951 et seq. She brought these claims against both the company and the PHRA claims against her supervisor at the Moosic center, James Johnson.…

    • 6840 Words
    • 28 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    To comply with the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, Mr. Stonefield’s limousine company cannot deny employment or terminate an employee over age if the employee is of the age of 40 and over. However, if an individual lacks necessary skill functions or has poor performance, who happens to be the age of 40 or over, the company is within its limits to terminate the employee. Because age is not a determining factor, the company is justified in terminating the…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Suppose there is a case where both Plaintiffs are women; Leath was forty-seven years of age when she was terminated, and Ackermann was fifty-seven.…

    • 527 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Marge's Lawsuit Case

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page

    This case has quite a few legal issues, however we will need furthermore information to determine if Marge can sue Bert. The legal issues of this case has indications of age discrimination, which Bert denies Marge the position because they believe she will retire because of her age being 58 and the position requires 5 years of training. However, another legal issue that can be found in this case is disparate treatment age discrimination and primia facie, and in order for it to be proven it must fall under these four conditions. The first condition is the individual must be 40 years old or older, in this case Marge fits this category. The second condition must show that the outcome of the employers decision affect them, in this case she was…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects certain applicants and employees 40 years of age and older from discrimination on the basis of age in hiring, promotion, discharge, compensation, or terms,…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA), as amended in 1986, protects employees who are 40 year old and over from discrimination in pay, benefits, or continued employment. Failure to comply with this law could result in lawsuits, back pay, and additional compensation for the employee filing the…

    • 621 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Eth 125 Week 8

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The age and Discrimination in Emplotyment Act (ADEA) is a law that protects workers 40 years and older from being fired due to their age, and then replaced by a younger worker that would presumably receive a lower rate of pay for the same job. The ADEA has gone so far as taking companies to court to prove they fired employees for reasons of being to old. The act also works the other way around. If an older person is hired in place of a younger, the discrimintation is stil the same and is upheld by this law. Even with the law in place the elderly are still fighting for their rights.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) of 1967, as amended, seeks to address the long standing problem of age discrimination in the workplace. The ADEA, which prohibits employment discrimination against persons over the age of 40, was enacted “to promote employment of older persons based on their ability rather than age; to prohibit arbitrary age discrimination in employment; [and] to help employers and workers find ways of meeting problems arising from the impact of age on employment.” The ADEA makes it unlawful for an employer “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual or otherwise discriminate against any…

    • 1910 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case 1

    • 274 Words
    • 1 Page

    1. Is Parker's speech development appropriate for his age? Explain? His speech is not developmentally appropriate because children that are nearing 2 years of age should be able to speak up to 50 words and be somewhat understandable on all words.…

    • 274 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays