Preview

Eisner V Macomber Case Brief

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
418 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Eisner V Macomber Case Brief
Citation Eisner v. Macomber,3 AFTR 3020, 252 US 189,1 USTC ¶32 (US, 1920)
Issue (1) Under the 16th Amendment, does Congress have the power to tax stock dividends received by the Macomber?
(2) Are stock dividends considered income?
Facts Mrs. Macomber owned 2,200 shares of Standard Oil Company. In January 1916, Standard Oil Company declared a 50% stock dividend. Mrs. Macomber received an additional 1,100 shares of stock with a $19,877 par value. The shares represented a surplus for Standard Oil Company. The Revenue Act of 1916, allowed the IRS to treat stock dividends as income to the sum of its cash value. Mrs. Macomber argued that the Revenue Act of 1916 was unconstitutional under the 16th Amendment. The Court clarified that the stock dividend was not income to the taxpayer.
Holding The Supreme Court ruled that Macomber was not required to pay taxes upon the stock dividends received. She was relived of her taxes upon the $19,877 from the additional shares.
Analysis (1) The 16th Amendment gave Congress the power to tax “income”, and in the common meaning of the word, “income” did not include unrealized gains that were still the property of the company. The Court stated that the taxpayer had not yet sold the shares, and that her investment was still exposed to business risks that could eliminate the surplus. The taxpayer does not realize increased value in property unless he/she receives “something of exchangeable value proceeding from the property”. Mrs. Macomber had not asked for the additional shares. If the IRS had required her to pay a tax on the stock dividend, she might have had to sell her shares, because there is no wherewithal to pay in the receiving of a stock dividend. A stock dividend is not considered income, and thus it is not subject to tax under the 16th Amendment.
(2)A stock dividend occurs when a corporation experiences a surplus and transfers that surplus to a capital stock. The company is performing simple bookkeeping

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Rudolph, Frances Hardman and Hardman, Inc. sought review of the lower court’s decision upholding tax deficiencies assessed by the Internal Revenue Service. Hardmans characterized a payment by a corporation as a part consideration for the purchase of property from Frances Hardman, treated the payment as a capital gain and the corporation added the payment to its basis in the property. IRS characterized the payment as a dividend, taxable as ordinary income and improperly added it to the corporation basis on resale. The appellate court identified eleven factors, which to varying degree influenced…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    You Decide (Acct 553 Wk 4)

    • 2829 Words
    • 12 Pages

    e. What tax benefits would John realize if he invested $15,000 in Jane’s jewelry making?…

    • 2829 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cesarini v

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page

    In 1964, Ermenegildo and Mary Cesarini discovered money in the sum of $4,467 in a used piano they purchased seven years earlier. In that year they included this money as ordinary income on their tax return, which they paid income tax for. The following year they filed an amended tax return excluding the found money from the gross income, thus creating a refund to the amount they had paid in the initial return. They believe that because they discovered the money seven years after the purchase it is not taxable due to the statute of limitations foreclosing the assessment of tax.…

    • 294 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Best Plan

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages

    6. Sparks Corporation receives a dividend of $100,000 from Jill Corporation, a C Corporation. Sparks owns 70% of Jill Corporation stock. Sparks' dividends-received deduction is $80,000.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 1 Homework Tax

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The 16th Amendment allowed Congress to impose taxes on whatever source derived. The sourced could be direct or indirect and without regard to census. The purpose of the taxes was to help financially support the government.…

    • 345 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study: Elmer Davis

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page

    This discovery dispute concerns three issues. The first issue is whether plaintiff Elmer Davis is entitled to see defendant National Inc.’s financial records. This effects document request numbers 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 11 and 12 (attached as Ex. 1). These requests all targets Nationals financial and tax records. While there are also some potential individual issues related to time and scope of the individual discovery requests, each of these requests raises the same threshold question: whether Davis is entitled to see Nationals’ financial records. See in re Garth, 214 S.W. 3d 190, 194 (Tex.App. – Beaumont 2007, Pet. Dism’d) (reversing trial court's order compelling production of financial records beyond what would evidence net worth).…

    • 246 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    week one assignment

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The purpose of the Sixteenth Amendment of the Constitution is to give the U.S. government the authority to raise revenue through a federal income tax “from whatever source derived.”…

    • 538 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Legal&Ethical

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Regarding the amount of the money that Stewart’s sale, her action had already violated the rule 10(b)(5), which had already hurt other investors. Even not in the monetary part, it broke the laws, already, after all.…

    • 951 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Ap Us History

    • 3205 Words
    • 13 Pages

    16th Amendment: The Sixteenth Amendment (Amendment XVI) to the United States Constitution allows the Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states or basing it on Census results. This amendment exempted income taxes from the constitutional requirements regarding direct taxes, after income taxes on rents, dividends, and interest were ruled to be direct taxes in Pollock v. Farmers ' Loan & Trust Co. (1895). It was ratified on February 3, 1913.…

    • 3205 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    16th Amendment

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    More Information-Finally, with the ratification of the 16th Amendment, any doubt was removed. The text of the Amendment makes it clear that though the categories of direct and indirect taxation still exist, any determination that income tax is a direct tax will be irrelevant, because taxes on incomes, from salary or from real estate, are explicitly to be treated as indirect. The Congress passed the Amendment on July 12, 1909, and it was ratified on February 3, 1913…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In the case, “FC of T v The Myer Emporium Ltd 87 ATC 4363”, the taxpayer “The Myer Emporium”, worked out a financial arrangement during 6-9 March 1981. Under the arrangement, it lent $80 million to its subsidiary, Myer Finance Ltd, at an interest rate of 12.5% pa. It also assigned its right to the interest (not to the principal) to Citicorp Canberra Pty Ltd for a lump sum in the order of $45 million. The commissioner treated the lump sum of $45 million received as an income receipt, assessable under s 25(1) of ITAA 1936 (Cth). The commissioner also contended that the amount received constituted a profit assessable under the second limb of s 26(a) as a profit arising from a profit-making scheme.1 Both the Victorian Supreme Court and the Full Federal Court decided in favor to Myer despite the fact the taxpayer had argued contrary to the Tax Office!s argument that the lump sum was merely realizing a capital asset because it was a gain from an isolated transaction outside the ordinary course of its retail and property development business. However, the High Court conferred its decision that the $45 million received by the Myer was assessable under s 25(1) as an income receipt and also under the second limb of s 26(a) as a profit from a profit-making under-taking or scheme2. On the facts in Myer, the High Court held that: “It is the fact that Myer!s business at all times was that of retailing and property developer. The income made by…

    • 1611 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The Sixteenth Amendment gave Congress the right to tax all income from whatever source derived.…

    • 1850 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Jewell v state case brief

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Reasoning: The court decided on the conviction by saying that Fisher bought the house in her own…

    • 427 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Equity: Trust Law

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages

    * HELD: Substantive rule of law was not altered by the Judicature Acts, which were intended only to achieve procedural improvements in the administration of law and equity.…

    • 4373 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    SEZ Ppt

    • 567 Words
    • 9 Pages

    SEZs An International Trade Outlook What are SEZs?    A region that has economic and other laws that are more free-market-oriented than a country's typical laws Rest of India called “Domestic tariff area” SEZ Act 2005 came into effect in Feb 2006 & is an improvement over the SEZ Act 1995 Facts & Figures No. of formal approvals 584 No. of notified SEZs 381…

    • 567 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays