Preview

Electoral College Pros And Cons

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1093 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Electoral College Pros And Cons
"The majority does not rule and every vote is not equal - those are reasons enough for scrapping the system. But there are other consequences as well. This election has been making clear how the Electoral College distorts presidential campaigns. A few swing states take on oversized importance, leading the candidates to focus their attention, money and promises on a small slice of the electorate." The 2000 election caused a lot of controversies. It took five weeks to determine the Presidency and the focus was placed too much on just one state. Many Presidential candidates spend their time and presidential money on the swing states which includes Nevada, Colorado, Iowa, Ohio, Virginia, New Hampshire, and Florida. We all have our own opinions …show more content…
One of the Pros is that the National Popular Vote wins the Electoral College majority, which proves the peoples voice and cote is heard and is being represented by the Electoral College. Another pro is that the Electoral College has been there are a small number of votes that needs to be counted. This minimizes fraud and paper trail. The Electoral College created a foundation for America to elect its president, but there are still flaws to the Electoral College. One of the cons is people have the idea of why vote if the President can still lose the National Popular Vote and still end up winning the Electoral Majority. This ends up invalidating the Democratic election and lowering voter turnout. Another Con is with only 270 Electors from the Electoral College they can veto the national popular vote majority. It violates the principle of popularly elected presidents. For the Third Parties, they have no chance in winning win-take-all elections. There is no point for voting for Third Parties with the Electoral College. Since America is basically a Third Party system country (Democrats and Republicans). There are some historical examples of pros of the Electoral College. For example, a 20th Century Presidents won both the Electoral College majority and National Popular Vote. One of the drawbacks from the Electoral College is if a candidate wins the popular vote it does not guarantee the Presidency, which has happened several times in history with Hayes in 1876, Harrison in 1888 and Bush in 2000. The 2000 election proved to be a con for the Electoral College. George W. Bush lost the National Popular Vote and Electoral College Majority and still became President. It went against the Democratic Values especially due to the Supreme Court deciding the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    I feel that the electoral college system needs to be removed from our presidential elections. It causes more harm than good and, makes many voters not vote. There are pros and cons to the system but, there are too many cons for it to continue. Presidential candidates only care about big states “for the win”. Which makes voters think they're small electoral college state is worthless. So in this essay, I will convince you and, tell you the truth behind the Electoral College system.…

    • 974 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every four years, the Electoral College enjoys a fleeting moment of fame. But the impact of the college on presidential elections is far greater and more controversial than its brief life indicates.…

    • 687 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Electoral college is a process that is set up by our founding fathers in the constitution; it is a “compromise between election of the President by a vote in Congress and election of the President by a popular vote of qualified citizens” (U.S Electoral College). Electoral college is an example of indirect democracy; therefore, we do not choose our president directly. Thus, electoral college is not democratic.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some people disagree with the Electoral College because they believe the system gives an unfair advantage to states with a large electoral vote. For example, there can be a candidate that does not get one single vote in, but they can still be elected by winning the popular vote in the bigger states, that have more number of electoral voters. Even if a candidate wins the majority of the smaller states, they will not win presidency because it does not have enough electoral votes. A candidate may have a high overall popular vote; however the one who wins is the one with the highest electoral…

    • 657 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pros- The electoral College allows each states vote to count, instead of focusing only on states with larger populations.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College, established by the founding fathers in the United States Constitution, is a process whereby a body of electors chosen by voters in each state cast a formal vote to elect the president and vice president. Among many other things established within the Constitution, the Electoral College requires extensive reform. The Constitution itself was merely a framework for the United States government and did not take into account the extent to which society would change between 1787 and 2015. Amidst the several problems constituted by the Electoral College, the four most threatening complications consist of the possibility for the loser of the popular vote to win the electoral vote, the inequality among the distribution of votes according to population, the exclusion of third party victors, and the consequences that arise in case of a tie.…

    • 651 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Electoral College is an institution that may have served a purpose 200 years ago when the founding fathers needed a system that would be met with approval by both large and small states. The Electoral College is a flawed method of electing our President that has created problems in previous elections and is likely to be the source of problems in the future. The Electoral College provides an undemocratic method of choosing our president that potentially undermines the will of the voters. Not only can a candidate be elected without actually winning the most votes, it puts our elections at the mercy of electors who don't always cast their vote as pledged. I intend to demonstrate that the problems inherent in this voting method far outweigh any benefits it may provide. Replacing the winner-take-all method of awarding electoral votes with a system such as proportional representation or eliminating the college altogether in favor of direct election is the best way to ensure a trouble-free and fair election…

    • 2120 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Instead, the system should just be modified. The whole winner-take-all system is what should be abolished in order to more accurately reflect the popular will across the nation. It should be replaced by the Congressional District Plan already put in use in Maine and Nebraska. In this new system, Electoral votes are distributed based on congressional district winners plus another two for whoever receives a majority of the state’s votes. This way, just like in Congress, the will of the people and the state are accurately represented in each…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The reason is because it allows for the possibility that one candidate would win the majority of the popular vote across the nation, and still be able to lose the election if another candidate wins the electoral vote. This has happened on more than one occasion, most recently in 2000 when George W. Bush won the electoral vote and became President despite the fact that his opponent, Al Gore, won the popular vote. The world was shocked when Bush was named winner of the U.S. presidential election, even after more U.S. voters had cast ballots for Gore. How could the U.S. call itself a democracy, yet not select its officials based on majority rule? The U.S. was not established as a pure democracy, but as a republic where voters elect representatives and electors. Whether there has ever been anything close to a pure and total democracy is debatable. There has never been universal suffrage. The result in 2000 election led many people to call for Electoral College reform or a change to a direct popular vote system. No major changes have yet been made to the system; the electoral college remains the “democratic” way we elect the President of the United…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The founding fathers were not gods. Consequently, they were not perfect, and neither were the systems they set up to run the country. Nevertheless, they knew that things would change, and they set up ways to fix the government when needed. In the Declaration of Independence, Thomas Jefferson wrote that the American people have the right to alter or abolish the government if it does not fit their needs. The Electoral College is flawed, and the American people need to replace it because this system does not fairly represent the people, it forces people to vote a certain way, and it does not always guarantee that the winner of the popular vote will win the election. These imperfections in the Electoral College make voters feel like their votes…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The pros for the electoral college is that is has been used for years. The basis of the electoral college is written down in the constitution. As long as the United States uses the electoral college as the way to vote in a president there will be no need for a constitutional amendment. It could be years before congress could effectively write and pass an amendment that could…

    • 618 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Critics argue that this system listens to the minority. In fact, it does not, this system discourages minority by using the winner take all rule. The winner take all rule promotes the idea that 49.9% of voters might get no representation. The Electoral should be changed to a proportional representation system, a method of voting by which political parties are given legislative representation in proportion to their popular vote. For example, in a state with 21 electors and 47% votes for Republicans and 53% for Democrats should get electors proportional to the popular vote, which would be 11 electors for Democrats and 9 for Republicans. This system would be much fair and would help represent both the minority and the majority of a certain state. Proportional elector system will not only encourage voter turnout, but also help accurately reflect the views of the public. Another reason why the Electoral College should be changed is because there is a theoretical possibility that a president loses the popular vote but still wins the electoral votes. As history shows, in the election of 1888 between Benjamin Harrison and Grover Cleveland, Benjamin Harrison won the election with plurality of the Electoral Vote (Harrison - 233 Electoral votes, Cleveland – 168 Electoral Votes),…

    • 1448 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the years the Electoral College has been proven to be outdated. People wonder constantly if their vote counts anymore or, if this method is affective any longer. There are three main reasons why the Electoral College is outdated and should be abolished. The presidential candidates only pay attention to the states with the most Electoral votes, we also have a larger and more educated population then when this was originally set up, lastly it does not seem as if your vote really counts since there have been at least four occurrences where the president with the popular vote has lost the election.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are other ways to satisfy the majority rather than abolishing the Electoral College. Lawyer Jeanne Kempthorne states some of the issues seen with the EC. One being that, “[the election] can easily result in an outcome that conflicts with the will of the people, whereby a candidate who loses the popular election nonetheless becomes president, as occurred in 2000 and almost occurred in 2004. This is a serious, recurring problem that afflicts both parties” (Jones 1). Robert Hall, a professor at Stanford University in Economics integrates that, “the Electoral College does not embody the egalitarian principle of popular sovereignty, the concept of "let the people rule" (Hall 1).…

    • 506 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Who 's voting for the president? Not you. We live in a society where your vote…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays