Emil Fackenheim had been troubled by an event, contemporary to him, which not only resulted in the extermination of thousands of Jews but also on the alteration in the way of thinking of many; the Holocaust. Fackenheim designated Auschwitz, a renowned concentration camp, to be an absolute representation of evil. This particular event had taken the life of Fackenheim’s older brother away (Encyclopedia.com). During the time of the Holocaust, Judaism was on the verge of disappearing as its followers were being hunted down by the Nazis. The survivors of the holocaust, being uncertain about what was the motive behind it, began to acquire a more skeptical view in regards to Judaism and God. This uncertainty, in most of the cases, resulted in the denial of this terrible event by the Jews themselves, but as Emile Fackenheim explains, this uncertainty would grant Hitler and the Nazis “a posthumous victory” (160) This victory can be interpreted as the fragmentation of Judaism as an organized doctrine, therefore ultimately achieving its termination (). Fackenheim states that as Jews they are “forbidden to affirm present and future life, at the price of forgetting Auschwitz” (159). As Emil Fackenheim states, the denial and doubt by the Jews would have boosted the effect that evil, in this case Auschwitz, had on the Jewish community. This Jewish explanation of evil is …show more content…
Julian of Norwich’s ideas were fully influenced by the terminal disease that had been affecting her health condition. Being ill, Julian of Norwich had several visions in which the truth of evil and sin had been revealed to her by God (Justus.anglican.org). Julian of Norwich explains that evil is common to human existence. Every individual is capable of sinning and capable of acting rightfully. A statement that she considered to be one of the main causes for evil to exist (Norwich 57). Unfortunately, humanity has inherited this flaw which prevents it from achieving goodness and perfection. As one might recall, the concept of prevention is explored in Mohammad Saeedimehr’s interpretation of evil as “privation.” Humanity inherited sin from the first human being to have ever existed, Adam. The sin committed by Adam is known as the original, because it was actually the first one and the worse of them all as Julian of Norwich explained when God revealed to her that “Adam’s sin was the most harm that ever was done” (Norwich 60). As a result of the original sin, humans, as successors of Adan, must take on this burden, sin, which is the source of all pains and disgraces. Because of the existence of evil, many humans doubt about the authenticity of the divine figure, God, which in turn is also a sin. The concepts of doubt and uncertainty were also explored by