Preview

Emmanuel Kant, Anthropology from the Pragmatic Point of View (1798)

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1501 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Emmanuel Kant, Anthropology from the Pragmatic Point of View (1798)
Emmanuel Kant, Anthropology from the pragmatic point of view (1798) This text is an extract from the Antropologie from the pragmatic point of view of Kant is about the importance of the power of saying « I » for the human subject. Indeed, for Kant, this force “raises Man on top of all other living beings”. This power is the founding of the superiority and of the dignity of Man, it is thanks to consciousness that Man becomes a moral being, in other words a being able to think himself and thus to wonder about the nature and the value of his acts. In the first part, from “Que l’Homme” [that Man] (line 1) to “sur la terre” [on earth] (line 2), Kant formulates his thesis while in the second part, from “il est par la” [it is by that] (line 2) to “l’entendement” [the understanding] (line 10), he explains it. Finally, the last part of the text is used for showing the origin of his thesis and for justifying it at the same time.

What does the author want to show by writing this text? Why? In the first part, two essential questions can be asked. We could initially wonder to what would correspond the “Je” [ I ] in “Que l’homme puisse se disposer du Je dans sa representation” [That man could be able to dispose of « Je » in his representation]. A way of interpreting this would be the capacity that Man has, to think himself, to be at the same time a subject and an object of his thoughts. Kant while implying this “Je” with a “J” capital letter implies self-consciousness, self-awareness. Indeed, the “Je” represents the « me ». What is the “me”? Pascal asked that question. The “Ich” (the “I” in Kant’s language), is the consciousnessthat I am but not of what I am. Kant differentiates oneself that can be aware of his consciousness and self-knowledge.

Kant qualifies Man of way higher than animals. In other words, for Kant, Man deserves to be regarded as a person and the animal is classified with the « things » which man can use. However animal shares with

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Life Of Pi Theme Analysis

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Humans and animals are two different things; however, they can be the same. We consider ourselves different from animals because we don’t walk on all fours, don’t eat off the ground, we have manners, we know the difference between right and wrong, and we have free will. Although, animals have the ability to do what they want when they want,…

    • 353 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    There is an old saying that it is better to be lucky than good. This may be true if a person is always lucky, but luck sometimes has a tendency to run out. Making decisions that affect other people’s lives based on luck can be sometimes dangerous, and usually ethically questionable. Leaders who routinely depend on luck for success may find themselves relying on other questionable actions, such as lying, cheating, or stealing, to ensure luck stays on their side. Additionally, this type of behavior may force subordinates to make ethically questionable decisions when luck begins to run out.…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    About Animals". In this article he sheds light on the human like qualities of animals,…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    First of all, one of the reasons that humans should be in a separate category from non-human animals is that human beings are conscious and can choose courses of action (Alger and Alger). Human beings are capable of taking wise decisions by using their judgement. On the other hand, the other animals are not conscious and operate only on instinct (Alger and Alger).…

    • 734 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin says that animals have the same human qualities that humans have. And with that they deserve more if not the same amount of respect as human beings. He gives many examples on how some animals are human like emotion and skilled wise. I disagree with Rifkin. I think that most animals should not get more respect than human beings reason being that most of the animals he listed are going to be killed and be used for reasonable human use.…

    • 396 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s essays Critique of Pure Reason and Critique of Practical Reason led to his critique Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone.…

    • 953 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Kant would accept the request to use dogs to research a cure for heroin. To Kant, humans have indirect duties to animals. He believes that it’s in a human’s interest to animals…

    • 351 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    From the way that Kant has been interpreted as a constructivist under the standard model, as Wood’s revealed, one can remark three points about this approach: Overemphasizing on the Formula of Universal Law (FUL), Conception of Value, Conception of Autonomy.…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He has theories and one of his quotes for categorical imperative is “Act only on that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law” (Kant 105). What he argues about his quote is that if you want someone or others to do good, then you first will have to do well to them. You think first before doing your actions, and you begin to do your actions later. One example would be my first year in college. I was still undecided of what major I wanted. I then started thinking if I should just quit school and get a job, or should I stay in school and continue my education. As I asked myself that question, I began to think about the consequences of quitting in school and not quitting. By quitting school, I would have lack of education, and also won’t have a high paying job. If I stay in school and not quit, we then see that by staying in school will result in a better education. I will also get a good job with better payment. I also thought about the influences I would give to my brothers of quitting or not quitting school. There is good and bad for quitting and not quitting school. The point of view that came up to my head was that how each of us create our own universal law. Universal law is your own law and how it can affect everyone around you. So he thinks that by thinking first about anything we want,…

    • 1329 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    But our humanity is our burden, our life; we need not battle for; we need only to do what is infinitely more difficult—that is, accept it. The faith of the present novel lies in its rejection of life, the human being, the denial of his beauty,…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Unequal Value Thesis

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page

    In the article of the moral standing, the value of lives and specieism Frey presents his "unequal-value thesis". From his point of view he explains why and how proving the equivalence of animals and humans is impossible through his statements of autonomy, rank and "human morality".…

    • 308 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Emmanuel Kant Analysis

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Kant argues that the human understanding of our world is perceived by our experiences and only through them can we gain knowledge. Kant’s philosophic question is rooted in the theory of understanding; in short, what can we know and how can we know it? Most of our knowledge of the world can be derived from our observation of it. As children, we see things, touch things, smell things and so on. Gradually, we understand the world in which we live in; this is the knowledge of sense-perception. For example, wind has no physical form but we can see its effects and can classify it as being part of nature. Kant, however, perceives knowledge only through our experiences. So going back to the example of wind, Kant would say we have knowledge of wind not because we…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    1. Kant does not believe that animals can have rights. Why doesn't he think so? And despite his denial of animals' rights, he doesn't think we can just treat animals however we want. Again, why doesn't he think so? Explain his view of our moral or immoral treatment of animals.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Animal Rights - 13

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages

    superior in status. Animals have been around on the earth for as long as humans,…

    • 1331 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The first premise of his argument was that all human and non-human animals possess equal inherent value because they are all individuals experiencing life. His second premise is that possessing inherent value demands that these individuals have rights that should not be violated by others. The final premise of his argument is that any individual with rights must be treated equally and with respect. In this paper, I objected to his third premise by arguing that we humans should not interact with animals at all because we are not able to distinguish their perception of equality and…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays