Preview

English Listening

Best Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1168 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
English Listening
THE HONG KONG INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION

Department of Social Sciences

GED 1015
Animal Rights: Science, Sentience and Speciesism
Semester two, 2012/13

Time of lecture: Monday (9:30am to 11:20am)
Venue: B4-LP-07

Instructor: Dr. Francis MOK (莫家棟) Email: fktmok@ied.edu.hk Office: D4-1/F-01

I. Course descriptions:
In this course, we aim at providing students the conceptual tools and resources by which they can investigate and reflect on the relationship between human beings and other non-human animals. In particular, students are invited to evaluate the ways by which animals are treated in today’s world and to assess if there are any personal and cultural biases in so doing. Equipped with the facts, concepts, and theories learnt in the course, students will be able to make ethically informed choices regarding the food they eat, the clothing they wear, and the attitude they adopt in dealing with non-human entities in general.

In the process of reflection and evaluation, students will need to address the following set of questions: i. Do animals have any interests? ii. Do they matter morally and on what ground? How should we describe their moral status? iii. Are they intellectually inferior and thereby morally inferior? iv. Are there any rights of animal? Even if animals are not right-holders, do we have any moral obligations to them? v. What are the policy implications of recognizing the moral status of animals? How should they be treated? What is forbidden? What is permissible?

II. Course Intended Learning Outcomes:
Upon completion of this course, students should be able to: • CILO 1: Demonstrate an understanding of key facts, ideas, concepts, and distinctions in the discussions over the moral status of animals; • CILO 2: Demonstrate an understanding of the major ethical theories or moral considerations essential for the critical examination of our
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    Animal Rights: Comparing the Views of Hasselstrom and Regan
    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Animal Rights: Comparing the Views of Hasselstrom and Regan

    Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…

    • 1234 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Killings by Andre Dubus
    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Killings by Andre Dubus

    TABLE OF CONTENTS RS 300 Foundation of Ethics: Morality and Justice FALL SEMESTER Introductory information Mission Statement Letter to Juniors Resources Revision of two Creation of 2 Directions: What is an Ethical Question / Levels of Questions/IPN 5 Think-Pair-Share/Active Listening Directives 6 Classroom Activities: The Jigsaw/Fishbowl Directives 7 Accessing on-line resources 8-9…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Peter Singer: Sentience vs Self-Conciousness
    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages

    Peter Singer: Sentience vs Self-Conciousness

    More than three decades ago Peter Singer heralded the need for a new kind of liberation movement, one calling for a radical expansion of the human moral canvas and more importantly, a rejection of the horrors human beings have inflicted for millennia upon other sentient beings, treatment historically considered as being both natural and unalterable. Often regarded as being the father of the modern animal liberation movement, Singer contends that the campaign for animal liberation today is analogous to the struggles for racial and gender justice of the past. (1976, p. 34-36) This essay will attempt to highlight the distinctions made by Singer between sentience and self-conciousness and what implications such a distinction suggests for the moral status of animals. Furthermore, this essay will attempt to identify and contrast the moral status of animals with that of human animals and identify the bases of such standing in ethical deliberation.…

    • 1819 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Daniel Engster's Care Ethics And Animal Welfare
    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Daniel Engster's Care Ethics And Animal Welfare

    “Care Ethics and Animal Welfare” is an article written by Daniel Engster from the Journal of Social Philosophy, published by Wiley Periodicals in 2016. Daniel Engster received his PhD from the University of Chicago and is a professor in the Political Science department at the University of Texas in San Antonio.…

    • 441 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Phil. outline
    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Phil. outline

    B. Singer then turns to the substantive issue of “what are the implications of utilitarianism for our treatment of animals?”…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Different Ways in Which We Utilize Non-Human Animals
    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Different Ways in Which We Utilize Non-Human Animals

    There are many different ways in which we utilize non-human animals. From clothing, to food, bi-products, even friendship, non-human animals are a very integral part of our lives, and as such raise questions of morality in terms to their treatment. I personally did not give much thought to my personal use of non-human animals prior to this, but it turns out that it is in fact very extensive. My main use of non-human animals is for nutritional purposes. My diet consists of a variety of products, but my protein intake is heavy on non-human animal meats. Aside from the uses I give non-human animals as part of my daily diet, non-human animals are also present in my wardrobe. Whether it is wool pants, a cashmere sweater, or leather shoes, many of the different items I chose to wear have some sort of non-human animal by-product in them, increasing the use I give those non-human animals. Finally, I, like many of us, use products that have been developed through the use of medical research on non-human animals.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Do We Worry Too Much About the Welfare of Animals?
    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Do We Worry Too Much About the Welfare of Animals?

    The welfare of animals is a much spoken about topic, especially as the animals cannot talk about it themselves. It can be seen that our society worries too much about the welfare of animals but does not take enough action to protect these animals.…

    • 569 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    The Kantian View of Animal Ethics
    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Kantian View of Animal Ethics

    Although animal moral considerability has peaked the interest of many contemporary philosophers, such as James Rachels and Peter Singer, the question is really an age-old question that can be traced back to Plato and Aristotle. Immanuel Kant has probed the question of whether an animal has moral considerability. Kant continuously makes the distinction between humans and animals throughout his best-known contributions to moral philosophy. Therefore, I will address and present the counter-argument to the charge of speciesism, one of critical arguments of the animal rights movement, through a Kantian lens.…

    • 1830 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Annotated Bibliography On Eating Animals
    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Annotated Bibliography On Eating Animals

    The essay indicates humans’ behavior towards nonhuman animals. I will explain how factory farmers treat their livestock compared to non-factory farmers. I plan on bringing forth humans moral responsibilities to nonhuman animals.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Argumentative Essay: The Issue Of Granting Animal Rights
    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Argumentative Essay: The Issue Of Granting Animal Rights

    Animals from creation have been an essential integral part of human beings. They have frequently been, either directly or indirectly, used by humans to achieve their needs. Hence they are important part and great asset to humans. These animals do have lives different from that of humans and equally have some similar characteristics with humans like emotional feelings. This very fact puts humans in a difficult position of determining the amount of respect and regard that should be accorded to the animals. Some people agitate that animals should be granted same equal rights as human beings. Inasmuch as I quite agree that animals should be granted some rights in order to be free from cruel treatments by humans, the issue of granting them equal full rights as enjoyed by humans should not come up. An objective review of such factors as tradition, cultural believes, religious, socio-economic, and medical as well as salient natural features that distinguish animals from humans like morality, and ability to…

    • 1570 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Taking a Stand Against Peta
    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Taking a Stand Against Peta

    Animal rights debater Stephen R. L. Clark points out, “As humans, we are like the other animals and unlike them, tied to them and separate, in many ways,” (Golding). For example, humans are animals, our nature is an animal nature, our desires are, for the most part, animal desires, and our habit of hunting is like that of other animals. However, what sets us apart from other animals is the fact that we have legal rights (the right to vote) and moral rights (life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness). The distinction must be made that animals obviously can't have the same rights as humans, because their interests are not always the same as ours, and some rights would be irrelevant to animals. For instance, an animal such as a cat doesn't have an interest in voting and, therefore, doesn't have the right to vote because that right would be as meaningless…

    • 2615 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Lisa Kemmerer's Arguement Of Animal Rights
    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Lisa Kemmerer's Arguement Of Animal Rights

    If humans have been given rights of their own, animals should have rights, too. Animals don’t deserve to be experimented on. They feel pain just as humans. We shouldn’t take animals for granted. They have a huge part in our world’s natural cycle. In Lisa Kemmerer’s article titled “Animal Rights” she asserts the issue of what defines animal rights. She addresses the fact that animals need rights just as humans. Ms. Kemmerer subtopics consist of the challenges that follow animal rights, the importance of animal rights, and the reasons why we need to consider standing up for animal rights. As Lisa Kemmerer states, “Animal rights is a simple idea because, at the most basic level, it means only that animal share a right to be treated with respect. It is a profound idea because its implications are far-reaching” (275). It is very important to acknowledge that animals need to be treated with respect. Animals are unable to voice their own rights. It is our duty to use our own rights to advocate the rights of animals. Without advocates for the rights of animals, our economic system may drop from unlawful standards. As a second writer suggests that as human we have moral obligations to not judge one by their outward appearance, skin colour, and ethical background yet we seem to judge animals without considering their feelings (274). We have such an impact on animals that we must stand up for animals and protect them. If we don’t take a…

    • 1733 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Place Do Animals Have In Our Society?
    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages

    What Place Do Animals Have In Our Society?

    A few weeks ago I decided to do my research paper in regards to animal abuse. Knowing from the very beginning that I was completely against animal abuse I thought that this paper would be a piece a cake. All I would have to do was to give examples of actual cases of animal abuse and just throw in my personal feelings on that particular case. But the deeper I dug the more enlightened I became on the subject, which led me to ask myself the question that when it comes to animal abuse and/or animal cruelty what rights do animals actually have, if any, and what place do they have in our society? Historically, animals did not have any rights or a place in our society, since they were considered solely as “property”. Today, the courts still solve issues under the same concept as if they are “property”. Animals should not be considered as property they should be considered as part of the family, as for production animals they should be treated with the utmost respect, and testing on animals should be done away with.…

    • 2477 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary
    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Tom Regan Animal Rights Summary

    Determining the rights of non-human animals and deciding how to treat them may not be a choice available to our human society. As an advocate for the rights of animals, Tom Reganʻs three main goals are to abandon the use of animals in any scientific research, discontinue all commercial animal agriculture, and to completely terminate both commercial and sport animal hunting. To support these intentions, Regan argues that every human and non-human animal possesses inherent value, which makes them all more than a physical object or vessel. He then states that possessing inherent value allows every human and non-human to have rights of their own. To further his argument, Regan claims that the any human and non-human retaining rights requires equal treatment and respect from others. To conclude his argument, Regan states that due to these reasons, non-human animals cannot be treated as resources and must be treated by humans as equals. In this paper, I object to Reganʻs third premise, which states that non-human and human animals must be treated as equals and with respect, because our communication barrier with non-human animals restricts us from determining their notion of equal treatment or respect, and that attempting to do so could…

    • 990 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Summary of “The Case for Animal Rights”
    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Summary of “The Case for Animal Rights”

    In his essay The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan has set out a broad outline as an introduction for his book, The Case for Animal Rights, with same title. In the beginning, the author makes a special emphasis on that, the goals of the advocation of animal rights not only make people treat animals ‘more humane’, but also deny the view, which is fundamental wrong, that animals are humans’ resources. As a defender of animal rights as well as a philosopher, Regan attempts, through his professional knowledge, which area he has been exploring over ten years, to justify that animals have the rights as equal as human beings. In his own words, “people must change their beliefs before they change their habits”.…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics