Preview

Enola Gay Controversy

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1534 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Enola Gay Controversy
Was the atomic bomb necessary to secure a surrender from Japan? The academic historians vary in their answers to this questions, which in turn sparked the idea for the Enola Gay exhibit at the Smithsonian’s Air and Space Museum. In 1995, the curators and staff attempted to raise the academic standards of the museum by incorporating controversy into the museum experience. It juxtaposed the creation and restoration process of the Boeing B-29 Superfortress air-carrier that transported the atomic bomb against an unforgiving narrative of the aircrafts role in securing the victory over the Japanese. After years of outside parties protesting the exhibit, it was closed by the museum in 1998 following the ruined careers of almost all staff associated …show more content…
In 1946, President Truman established the museum to memorialize the development of aviation. Additionally, the lack of Air Force memorials caused the military members to bind themselves to the museum as their memorial. It grew into a key way of forming interest in the newly formed air and space programs of the US government after the war. It held a leading role in the development of Rocketry and worked with the government to present the aircraft and rocketry marvels of the United …show more content…
Other than the historical associations and peace advocates, few historical professions published on the work. Good public history relies on the ability of the curator to objectively present the question and findings. Sometimes, it differs from the overall opinion. In these situations, forming a defense that fosters discussion and recognition of both arguments enables the radical historian to relate to the public. For example, historians act as expert witnesses on a period by presenting the facts and social commentaries. This allows them to remain objective in spite of pressures pulling them towards a particular

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Although events in history occurred over a long span of time and development, history first became an academic subject a little more than 100 years ago (McNeill 12). Since then, a plethora of controversies appeared regarding how historians, scholars, and intellectuals should examine and analyze history. Among the initial methods of studying history was the scientific research method, or scientific source criticism, which fundamentally extracts valid, legitimate facts from a diverse range of historical sources. Throughout time, however, the facts derived from this method of historical study gradually altered, leading to a new method of historical study: using facts and combining them with opinions and goals to constitute personal interpretations. As Oscar Handlin zealously asserts, historians and scholars should provide a strict examination of history based on a chronological study of known and verifiable facts as opposed to using verifiable facts as the basis for their own interpretation, influenced by their own group, experiences, beliefs, and personal motives. Through implementing a strict examination of history, historians can successfully detect and eradicate bias in their writings, allow the government as well as individuals to gain an insight into the past in order to secure and progress the future, and grasp the magnitude of truth.…

    • 645 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    On January 30th, 1995 Martian Harwit, the National Air and Space Museum, or NASM, director, announced the cancelation of the exhibit “The Last Act: The Atomic Bob and the End of World War II.” This exhibit was at the center of a yearlong controversy about the Enola Gay, the United States Air Force B-29 bomber that dropped the atomic bomb known under the code name “Little Boy” on the Japanese city Hiroshima on August 6, 1945. This act was known as the act that ended World War II and saved the lives of many American soldiers that otherwise were to invade Japan. Paul Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay sated that the atomic bombing of Hiroshima was a “peace keeper…the harbinger of a cold war kept form getting hot.”2 While others believe that it was the beginning of a new holocaust due to it killing over 200,000 people, most of them civilians, not to mention the long term illnesses…

    • 2317 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    This decree outlined and detailed the terms of surrender for the Japanese Empire as agreed upon at the Potsdam Conference. Japan was offered the ultimatum of surrender or face “prompt and utter destruction.” On August 6, 1945 Colonel Paul Tibbet piloted the “Enola Gay” along with co-pilot Robert Lewis, over the city of Hiroshima, Japan and dropped a weapon of mass destruction. We know this ingenious evil as “Little Boy”.…

    • 1035 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In response to how the same information formulates disagreeing opinions between experts in a particular discipline, I have recognized a few main ways in which differing viewpoints are produced. Firstly, pre-established beliefs and notions can affect the way in which people perceive purely factual information. Secondly, the factual information may be presented in such a way that it is emotionally charged while still maintaining a purely factual nature. These trends are particularly evident within the disciplines of judicial ethics and history.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In what ways is controversy good for an exhibit or bad for exhibit? It all Depends on representation and interpretations of the historical item or event in question. Additionally, any attempts to write, exhibit, or interpret historical events can spark a controversy; further, provoke various arguments and struggles over historical truth. Consequently, controversy can be a double-edged sword.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Twenty years after Harry Truman ordered the dropping of the atomic bomb, scholars and citizens subscribed to the original version of the story: the President acted to avoid the invasion of Japan and lose anywhere from 200,000 to 500,000 American lives. Then in 1965, Gar Alperovitz published a the book “Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam”. He argues that the dropping of the atomic bomb “was not needed to end the war or to save lives” but was a message to the Soviet Union. Fifty years after the atomic bomb was dropped, Alperovitz said that the final answer to why the atomic bomb was dropped is “neither essential nor possible”. He also said,”What is important is whether, when the bomb was used, the President and his top advisers understood that it wa not required to avoid a long and costly invasion, as they later claimed and as most Americans still believe.” Alperovitz believes that if the bomb was not used, Japan might still have been made to surrender before the first American landing on the island of Kyushu.…

    • 745 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, two events that will always lie in infamy, because World War II was ended right after those two dates and the bombings introduced nuclear weapons to modern warfare. The bombings killed over two hundred thousand people and destroyed two Japanese cities, but in exchange for all that the Japanese were sparred a homeland invasion which could have easily surpassed the death toll that was seen in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As horrendous as they were, the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were necessary to end WWII and were justified in the sense that the United States had to do something proactive to break the will of Japan 's rulers and end the war.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb was something that helped America win the war. However, it wasn't something that our country absolutely needed. The United States did an awful thing when it dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. If it was aimed at a military target, it is not remembered for that. It is remembered because of the civilian people whose lives were ruined by this horrible action and the terror that the photos…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The atomic bomb dropped on Japan was the correlated decision of the president at the time, Harry Truman, and his chief advisors. While the pros and cons were weighed heavily, it was decided that the least blood shed would be wrought if we shed the most blood on the first strike. On August 6, 1945, the enola gay, a class B-29 heavy bomber, departed from Tinian, an island to the southeast of Japan, carrying a heavy payload which would effectively be the beginning of the end of Japan’s war against the United States. The payload at hand would be called “Little boy”, a Uranium comprised atomic bomb created for the simple purpose of mass destruction. The target of this weapon would be a bridge formed at a junction between two rivers in the downtown…

    • 1452 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Atomic Bomb Dbq

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages

    As World War II was coming to an end during 1945, the creation of one of the most destructive weapons known to humanity occurred within the United States. This weapon, known as “the atomic bomb,” was used on the two Japanese cities: Hiroshima and Nagasaki, resulting in a death toll unprecedented by any military weapon used before and an immediate, unconditional surrender. Some historians believe President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb in order to intimidate the Soviet Union whereas others believe it was a strictly military measure designed to force Japan’s unconditional surrender. In the Report of a Scientific Panel of nuclear physicists, some scientific colleagues believed the atomic bomb was a “purely technical demonstration” to induce surrender. Other scientists believed that the use of the atomic bomb will improve international prospects in that they are more concerned with the prevention of war than with the elimination of this special weapon (Doc G). Thus, the United States dropped the atomic bomb to both force Japan’s unconditional surrender and to intimidate the Soviet Union.…

    • 949 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    When a person thinks of a historian they would probably say they are a museum curator or someone who just studies the past. However, they truly do not understand what it means to be a historian. In the book The Landscape of History: How Historians Map the Past, John Gaddis goes into explicit detail on what it takes for a historian to properly and accurately present the past to the public. There are three main elements that I found interesting in this explanation. They are the fact that the historian must use time, space, and scale. As such, we shall delve into this for further examination.…

    • 504 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The propaganda taught in grade schools was that the United States dropped the atomic bomb to save American lives and end the war. President Truman and some advisors stated after the war, that somewhere between five hundred thousand to one million American lives would be loss with an invasion of the Japanese homeland (37). So, in an attempt to bring the War in the Pacific to an end they used the atomic bomb. They also justified the use of the atomic bomb by claiming using the bomb would save an untold number of Japanese lives. The information which came from President Truman and his administrative sounded sensible and salved the conscious of America, but was it the truth? In his book, historian J. Samuel Walker provides a step by step analysis of events leading to Truman’s use of the atomic bomb to bring World War II to closure and extensive coverage of the relationship of the United States and the U.S.S.R.…

    • 525 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Four Eras of Writing

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Late- nineteenth-century historians, usually called “historicists” or “positivists” believed that history was like science and with practice it could be solved. According to Couvares, Croce believed that Positivists were faulty in their assumptions because history was perceived differently every time it was written down since no one thinks exactly alike. With so many different views, historians are usually adding more and more information to each other’s perceptions.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays