Preview

Essay 7- Third Party Rights- Transfer of Auto Payment Collection Rights

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
332 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
Essay 7- Third Party Rights- Transfer of Auto Payment Collection Rights
Pam borrows $25,000 from Quality Auto Sales to buy a car. When Pam does not pay the loan or return the car, Quality wants to transfers the right to the payment to Rapid Collection Agency. Rapid agrees to pay Quality for this right, but for a price that is less than the amount owed. Can Quality transfer this right to Rapid without Pam’s consent? If so, and Quality committed fraud in the deal with Pam, could Pam legitimately refuse to pay Rapid? Explain.
The transfer of contractual rights to a third party is known as an assignment. The transfer of contractual duties to a third party is known as a delegation. An assignment or a delegation occurs after the original contract is made. The book gives the example of Tia obtaining a loan from a bank and later she receives notice that the bank has assigned its rights to receive payments to another firm. When it is time to pay the loan, Tia is obligated to make payments to the other firm.
In this situation, Quality can transfer the rights to Rapid without Pam’s consent. The only times that rights can’t be assigned are; when there is a statute prohibiting assignment, the contract is personal in nature, the assignment will significantly change the risk of the duties of the obligor, or when the contract prohibits assignment. In this case, none of these situations apply. Companies often transfer their right to payments to collection agencies after a certain period of time or after determined to be uncollectable.
In conclusion, Quality can transfer the right to Rapid without Pam’s consent. If Quality has committed fraud in the deal with Pam, then Pam could legitimately refuse to pay Rapid. Pam could sue Quality for fraudulent practices, which would prevent Rapid from making any efforts to collect payment. If fraud was proven, it would mean that Rapid no longer has a right of payment from Pam since Quality acted fraudulently in the deal.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Assuming that the Montana law prohibits oral modifications of written contracts without actual performance/execution, then unless some profit-sharing was actually paid, or some memorandum exists from Loren proving the profit-sharing agreement was made, then Dennis cannot enforce the modified agreement, because he cannot satisfy the burden of production necessary to prove the contract 's existence.…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Law 421 Week 4

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The facts that weight in favor of Chou are the verbal agreement was accepted by both parties. Also it was agreed that the distribution contract would not exist unless it was in writing. A fact that can favor against Chou is that he was paid for a promise or performance. Another fact that weighs against Chou was that he did not reject the agreement that was e-mailed to him, therefore any and all terms in that contract were binding whether or not he agreed to them after the fact.…

    • 636 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It seems as though neither ReadyPro or Bengali Gas Pipeline Company held up their end of the bargain by issuing timely paychecks to Janice. Neither company took the necessary measures to keep Janice happy, even though her requests were completely justified. Bengali Gas Pipeline company also reduced the amount of reimbursements Janice was contracted to receive, even though they said they were unwilling to make any changes to the existing contract. Bengali Gas Pipeline Company violated their own contract by reducing the amount of reimbursements Janice was supposed to receive.…

    • 748 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    BTT and Chou must exhibit mutual assent to determine when a contract was reached. The contract is determined to be valid if shown that an offer was made (by BTT), and there was acceptance by Chou. Initially, BTT and Chou entered a 90-day agreement for exclusive negotiation rights to Strat in exchange for $25,000. Once payment is accepted, Chou’s right to solicit distribution from an outside party is restricted. This shows mutual assent as the promisee, Chou, gave up a legal right and the promisor, BTT, made its promised based on a mutual exchange.…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hsc300 Unit 4

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages

    3. Assignment: States that the rights and obligations under the Client Agreement may not be assigned to another party…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    4. Dan has no rights against Ben to receive the $100.00. Although Ben created an offer by telling Dan he would pay him $100.00 and Dan accepted the offer, the consideration, Dan assisting with the landscaping project, happened in the past. This case is similar to the one in which Leah was not given the apartment she was promised. Because Dan’s end of the bargain, was already complete he faced no detriment and therefore he has no rights against Ben.…

    • 224 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In the simulation there are two parties Span Systems that makes and distrubites the most prestigious banking software and C-S (Citizen-Schwartz) a large German bank. Eight months in to the project some issues occured with both partys not satsfyied more on C-S behalf because they weren 't satsfied Spans deliverables in the last couple months were behind schedule, the quality of the deliverables weren 't up to the standards with C-S, and with major bugs detected within the user testing stage. C-S is demanding immediate transfer of all unfinished code; asserted rescission of contract.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    terms on which the agency will operate, and they have signed a contract. According to the…

    • 988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sales accounting

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page

    b. A requirement to obtain the transferor's permission to sell or pledge that is not to be unreasonably withheld…

    • 275 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Upbeat Inc.

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Both transfer provisions have the possibility to preclude sales accounting. Transfer provision 1 may allow for UpBeat to retain the benefit by requiring permission to sell the financial assets. It may be inferred by some that because UpBeat cannot unreasonably withhold the sale the benefit transfers to the bank, however, more information is required to properly known exactly what unreasonably withhold means. Transfer provision 2 has the possibility to allow a sale if the fixed price received for the repurchased receivable is a fair value for the price of the receivables at the time of the sale.…

    • 518 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    CCP Management

    • 306 Words
    • 1 Page

    However, it can be seen that CCP also performed such tasks which did not require any of the licenses. In this case it has demanded to be compensated for those services where there was no requirement of a license for their performance. Yet, there needs to be knowledge of additional facts to resolve this issue. Whether Andrew Hoganmuller was ignorant of the fact that CCP does not have the licenses or not at the time of entering the agreement is also essential to be known. In case a severability clause was there in the contract, it would be considered partially voidable making Andrew liable to pay for the services with no requirement of license. In case, the severability clause was not there in the agreement and the terms of the agreement cannot be considered independent of each other, the whole agreement may be void on the basis that CCp did not have the capacity to enter the agreement. A severability clause divides a contract into many parts where default on one does not make the whole contract void.…

    • 306 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Scott felt that in no way did it violate the terms of the contract. Scott had not been paid for the first year of the contract. However, it became clear early in the mediation that Rapid was not in a good financial state. So, winning a legal battle could ultimately end up being a loss for Scott if Rapid filed for bankruptcy. Both sides agreed that there was a miscommunication regarding the deliverables on the software between the lower level managers.…

    • 1841 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Contract and Dina

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Based on the above facts, BNI and Carol do not have a contract. At first, BNI made an offer to Carol on May 1 and gave her 10 days to accept this offer. However, Carol did not accept this offer by making a counter offer on May 5. Because of the counter offer on May 5, the former offer had been terminated and no longer exist. Hence the later agreement to do the work for $ 10,000 made by Carol is meaningless because the original offer had been deleted by her offer counter.…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Here the agreement between Pat and Dan falls outside of Common Law and within the boundaries of the Statue of Frauds. The most relevant of the types of contracts which fall within the Statue of Frauds, is an agreement for the sale of land and for an interest in land, or an agreement by a purchaser of real property to pay an indebtedness…

    • 1017 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The elements required to form an enforceable contract have been satisfied. There is an intention to create legal relations, an offer, acceptance, sufficient consideration, and certainty of the terms of the contract. Susan is in breach of the option contract, so she cannot revoke her original offer to Terry. Terry can therefore sue her for breaching the option contract, but he cannot sue her for breaching the main contract. Terry received Susan’s letter of revocation after his letter of acceptance was already posted. Thus, applying the postal acceptance rule, she cannot sell the gold to Renzo…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays